Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T18:22:28.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Demography as Policy Science in the British Empire, 1918–1969

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Karl Ittmann
Karl Ittmann
Affiliation:
University of Houston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1944, Robert Kuczynski, a demographer working with the Colonial Office, wrote a memo discussing plans for a postwar census of the British Empire. He called for the creation of a Colonial Demographic Service, arguing that Colonial Office programs “offer no guarantee of a decisive improvement unless there is an expert on the spot to make an effective use of these means.” Kuczynski's firm belief in the need for expert knowledge matched the growing willingness of the Colonial Office to call upon experts in a variety of fields to assist in the reshaping of colonial government. This article examines why demography came to be seen as useful for colonial governance in the interwar years and how officials attempted to make use of demographers and demographic information in the final years of the British Empire. At present, this topic falls between several existing literatures. Works by Richard Soloway, Daniel Kelves, and others document the domestic history of demography in Great Britain, particularly its involvement in debates over hereditarian views of population. At the international level, most recent studies deal with the United States and trace the origins of American support for programs of population control after 1945. Still another body of literature chronicles the unique nature of policy formation in Britain and its relationship with social science in the twentieth century. This article seeks to connect these literatures by focusing on the colonial and international role of British demography from the end of World War I to the postcolonial era of the 1960s.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Policy History , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , October 2003 , pp. 417 - 448
Copyright
Copyright © The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Memo from Robert Kuczynski, Personnel for Reorganization of Colonial Popula tion and Vital Statistics, 7 December 1944, Colonial Research Council 218, London School of Economics Archives. See also CO 927/10/3 Research–Social Services–Demography and Census, 1946.

2. Soloway, Richard, Demography and Degeneration (Chapel Hill, 1990)Google Scholar; Kelves, Daniel, In the Name of Eugenics (New York, 1985)Google Scholar; Szreter, Simon, Fertility, Class, and Gender in Britain, 1860–1940 (Cambridge, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3. Hodgson, Dennis, “Demography as Social Science and Policy Science,” Population and Development Review 9, no. 1 (1983): 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sharpless, John, “World Population Growth, Family Planning, and American Foreign Policy,” Journal of Policy History 7, no. 1 (1995): 72–102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Hodgson, Dennis, “Orthodoxy and Revisionism in American Demography,” Population and Development Review 14, no. 4 (1988): 541–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Greenhalgh, Susan, “The Social Construction of Population Science,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 38, no. 1 (1996): 26–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Szreter, Simon, “The Idea of the Demographic Transition and the Study of Fertility Change: A Critical Intellectual History,” Population and Development Review 19, no. 4 (1993): 659–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4. This article will not deal directly with India or the India Office, which constituted a separate establishment within the British government.

5. See Lewis, Jane, Empire and State-Building: War and Welfare in Kenya, 1925–52 (Athens, Ga., 2000)Google Scholar. For France, see Conklin, Alice, A Mission to Civilize: The Republican Idea of Empire in France and West Africa, 1895–1930 (Stanford, 1997)Google Scholar.

6. Historians have studied this in India in particular. See Bernard Cohen, “The Census, Social Structure, and Objectification in South Asia,” in Cohen, Bernard, An Anthropologist Among the Historians and Other Essays (Oxford, 1987), 224–254Google Scholar, and Ludden, David, “Orientalist Empiricism: Transformations of Colonial Knowledge,” in Carol Breckenridge and Peter van der Veer, Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia (Philadelphia, 1993), 250–278Google Scholar.

7. A considerable literature on the history of population programs, much of it critical, has emerged in recent years. See Warwick, Donald, Bitter Pills (Cambridge 1982)Google Scholar; Donaldson, Peter, Nature Against Us: The United States and the World Population Crisis, 1965–1980 (Chapel Hill, 1990)Google Scholar; de Arellano, Annette Ramierez and Seipp, Conrad, Colonialism, Catholicism, and Contraception: A History of Birth Control in Puerto Rico (Chapel Hill, 1983)Google Scholar; Dixon-Mueller, Ruth, Population Policy and Women's Rights (Westport, Conn., 1993)Google Scholar.

8. For a good summary of the Treasury role, see Clark, Peter, “The Treasury's Analytical Model of the British Economy Between the Wars,” in Furner, Mary and Supple, Barry, eds., The State and Economic Knowledge: The American and British Experiences (Cambridge, 1990), 171–207Google Scholar.

9. See Butterworth, Eric and Holma, Robert, eds., Social Welfare in Modern Britain (Glasgow, 1975)Google Scholar, and Mommsen, Wolfgang and Mock, W., The Emergence of the Welfare State in Britain and Germany (London, 1981)Google Scholar; Laybourn, Keith, The Evolution of British Social Policy and the Welfare State (Keele, 1995)Google Scholar; Jones, Kathleen, The Making of Social Policy in Britain, 1830–1990 (Atlantic Highlands, N.J., 1994)Google Scholar; Thane, Pat, The Foundations of the Welfare State (New York, 1982)Google Scholar. For the postwar period, see King, Desmond, “The Politics of Social Research: Institutionalizing Public Funding Regimes in the United States and Great Britain,” British Journal of Political Science 28 (1998): 415–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10. For a discussion of the pre-1914 state and experts, see MacLeod, Roy, ed., Government and Expertise: Specialists, Administrators, and Professionals, 1860–1919 (Cambridge, 1988)Google Scholar.

11. Smith, Cyril, “Networks of Influence: The Social Sciences in the United Kingdom Since the War,” in Wagners, Peter et al. , eds., Social Sciences and Modern States (Cambridge, 1991), 131–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12. Supple, Barry, “The State and Social Investigation in Britain Between the World Wars,” in Lacey, Michael and Furner, Mary, eds., The State and Social Investigation in Britain and the United States (Cambridge, 1993), 365–387Google Scholar.

13. Bulmer, Martin, “Mobilizing Social Knowledge for Social Welfare: Intermediary Institutions in the Political Systems of the United States and Great Britain Between the First and Second World Wars,” in Weindling, Paul, ed., International Health Organizations and Movements, 1918–1939 (Cambridge, 1995), 305–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14. Savage, Gail, The Social Construction of Expertise: The English Civil Service and Its Influence, 1919–1939 (Pittsburgh, 1996)Google Scholar.

15. Bulmer, Martin, “The Governmental Context: Interaction Between Structure and Influence,” in Bulmer, , ed., Social Science Research and Government (Cambridge, 1987), 27–39Google Scholar.

16. There is a considerable literature on foundations and the social sciences. In this context, see Fisher, Donald, “American Philanthropy and the Social Sciences in Britain, 1919–1939: The Reproduction of a Conservative Ideology,” Sociological Review 28, no. 2 (1980): 277–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Bulmer, Martin and Bulmer, Joan, “Philanthropy and Social Science in the 1920s: Beardsley Ruml and the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial 1922–1929,” Minerva 19 (Autumn 1981): 347–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also the Fisher-Bulmer Exchange in Sociology 18, no. 4 (11 1984): 572–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar. More generally, see Lagemann, Ellen, The Politics of Knowledge: The Carnegie Corporation, Philanthropy, and Public Policy (Middletown, Conn., 1989)Google Scholar.

17. Durbin, Elizabeth, New Jerusalems: The Labour Party and the Economics of Democratic Socialism (London, 1985)Google Scholar.

18. See Hawkins, Mike, Social Darwinism in European and American Thought, 1860–1945 (Cambridge, 1997), 184–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19. Carr-Saunders, Alexander, Population Problems: A Study in Human Evolution (London, 1922)Google Scholar.

20. Knibbs, George, The Shadow of the World's Future (London, 1928), 76Google Scholar.

21. Szreter, Fertility, 67–282.

22. The extensive literature on social imperialism deals with this connection. Semmel, Bernard, Imperialism and Social Reform (Cambridge, 1960)Google Scholar, and Davin, Anna, “Imperialism and Motherhood,” History Workshop Journal 5 (1978): 9–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, are just two of the best-known examples.

23. Higgs, Edward, “The Statistical Big Bang of 1911: Ideology, Technological Innovation, and the Production of Medical Statistics,” Social History of Medicine 9, no. 3 (1996): 409–426CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Ross, Dorothy, The Origins of American Social Science (Cambridge, 1991), 390–470Google Scholar.

24. Hodgson, “Orthodoxy and Revisionism,” 541–67.

25. Thompson, Warren, “Population,” American Journal of Sociology 34, no. 6 (1929): 959–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26. Hodgson, Dennis, “The Ideological Origins of the Population Association of America,” Population and Development Review 17, no. 1 (1991): 1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27. For example, see Kuczynski, Robert, The Balance of Births and Deaths, 2 vols. (Washington, D.C., 1928; 1931)Google Scholar, and The Measurement of Population Growth: Methods and Results (London, 1935). See also Glass, David, Population Policies and Movements in Europe (London, 1940)Google Scholar. Even Carr-Saunders responded to this trend, publishing World Population in 1936. This book relied heavily on the data and techniques of the new demographers and Carr-Saunders employed Glass as a research assistant for its preparation.

28. For more on Glass's career, see Borrie, W. D., “David Victor Glass, 1911–1978,” The Proceedings of the British Academy 68 (1982): 537–560Google Scholar.

29. Grebenik, E., “Demographic Research in Britain, 1936–1986,” Population Studies 45 (1991): supplement, 4–6Google ScholarPubMed.

30. Jay Winter, “Population, Economists, and the State: The Royal Commission on Population, 1944–49,” in Furner and Supple, The State and Economic Knowledge, 436–60.

31. Soloway, Richard, Demography and Degeneration (Chapel Hill, 1990), 259–311Google Scholar, and Thompson, Matthew, The Problem of Mental Deficiency: Eugenics, Democracy, and Social Policy in Britain, c. 1870–1959 (Oxford, 1998), 188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32. Eugenics Society Papers (hereafter ES), Contemporary Medical Archives Centre (hereafter CMAC), SA/EUG/GC/88/1,2. See also Soloway, Richard, “The ‘Perfect Contraceptive’: Eugenics and Birth Control Research in Britain and America in the Interwar Years,” Journal of Contemporary History 30, no. 4 (1995): 637–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33. Blacker, C. P., Eugenics in Prospect and Retrospect (London, 1945), 21–22Google Scholar, and Soloway, Demography, 271–74.

34. Dahrendorf, Ralf, LSE: A History of the London School of Economics and Political Science, 1895–1995 (Oxford, 1995), 249–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Harris, José, William Beveridge: A Biography (Oxford, 1997), 277–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Grebenik, “Demographic Research,” 7–10.

35. Langford, C. M., The Population Investigation Committee (London, 1988)Google Scholar. Borrie, “David Victor Glass,” 537–60.

36. Fisher, Donald, “Rockefeller Philanthropy and the British Empire: The Creation of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine,” History of Education 7, no. 2 (1978): 129–143CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

37. Fisher, Donald, “The Rockefeller Foundation and the Development of Scientific Medicine in Great Britain,” Minerva 16 (Spring 1978): 20–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

38. Higgs, Edward, “Medical Statistics, Patronage, and the State: The Development of the MRC Statistical Unit, 1911–1948,” Medical History 44 (2000): 323–340Google ScholarPubMed; Grebenik, “Demographic Research,” 4.

39. Edge, P. Granville, “The Demography of British Colonial Possessions,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society C, Part II (1937): 181–231Google Scholar.

40. Grebenik, “Demographic Research,” 22.

41. Teitelbaum, Michael and Winter, Jay, The Fear of Population Decline (San Diego, 1985)Google Scholar, and Soloway, Demography, 226–58.

42. MacNicol, John, “The Voluntary Sterilization Campaign in Britain, 1918–1939,” Journal of the History of Sexuality 2, no. 3 (1992): 422–438Google Scholar.

43. Gregory, J. W., The Menace of Colour (London, 1925)Google Scholar, and Thompson, Warren, Danger Spots in World Population (New York, 1929)Google Scholar.

44. For example, see Marchant, James, Empire and the Birth Rate (London, 1917)Google Scholar.

45. See, for example, McCleary, G. F., Population: Today's Question (London, 1938)Google Scholar.

46. Constantine, Stephen, ed., Emigrants and Empire (Manchester, 1990)Google Scholar, and Fedorowich, Kent, Unfit for Heroes: Reconstruction and Soldier Settlement in the Empire Between the Wars (Manchester, 1995)Google Scholar.

47. ES Papers, CMAC, SA/EUG/D.103.

48. Ipsen, Carl, Dictating Demography: The Problem of Population in Fascist Italy (Cambridge, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Weindling, Paul, Health, Race, and German Politics Between National Unification and Nazism, 1870–1945 (Cambridge, 1989)Google Scholar, Horn, David, Social Bodies: Science, Reproduction, and Italian Modernity (Princeton, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Adams, Mark, “Eugenics in Russia, 1900–1940,” in Adams, Mark, ed., The Wellborn Science (Oxford, 1990), 153–216Google Scholar.

49. Seltzer, William, “Population Statistics, the Holocaust, and the Nuremberg Trials,” Population and Development Review 24, no. 3 (1998): 511–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50. Broberg, G. and Rolle-Hansen, N., eds., Eugenics and the Welfare State: Sterilization Policy in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland (East Lansing, Mich. 1996)Google Scholar; Reilly, P. R., The Surgical Solution: A History of Involuntary Sterilization in the U.S. (Baltimore, 1991)Google Scholar.

51. For an examination of this issue in the French context, see Reggiani, Andres, “Alexis Carrel, the Unknown: Eugenics and Population Research Under Vichy,” French Historical Studies 25, no. 2 (2002): 331–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52. Stone, Dan, “Race in British Eugenics,” European History Quarterly 31, no. 3 (2001): 397–425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

53. Barkan, Elazar, The Retreat of Scientific Racism (Cambridge, 1992)Google Scholar.

54. For Huxley's rather complicated views, see ibid., 178–89, 235–48, 296–310.

55. CO/859/62/17, Birth Control–West Africa, 1943.

56. Langford, Chris, The IUSSP (London, 1984)Google Scholar.

57. Chesler, Ellen, Margaret Sanger, Woman of Valor (New York, 1992), 258–259, 355Google Scholar.

58. Ibid., 235–37, 355–70; ES Papers, CMAC, SA/EUG/GC/88/1,2. Sanger, Margaret and How-Martyn, Edith, Round the World for Birth Control (London, 1936)Google Scholar. CO 129/565/5 Hong Kong Eugenics League, 1937, CO/129/571/17; Hong Kong Eugenics League, 1938; CO 273/645/8 Birth Control–Straits Settlements, 1938. CO 37/282/9 Birth Control–Bermuda, 1934, and CO 37/208/8 Birth Control–Bermuda, 1935.

59. SirMegaw, John, “Pressure of Population in India,” Journal of the Royal Society of Arts 87 (1938–1939): 134–157Google Scholar.

60. One exception was the radio program “One Generation to Another,” which held a panel discussion, “The Population Problem: The Experts and the Public,” in 1937, which included Carr-Saunders and Kuczynski as panelists. It was published as a book in 1938 by George Allen & Unwin.

61. CO 323/1023/5 IUSIPP 1928.

62. CO 129/571/17/ Hong Kong Eugenics League, 1938.

63. CO 323/1523/2 Population Problems in the Colonies, 1937; CO 859/62/16 Birth Control–West Indies, 1941–42.

64. Ittmann, Karl, “The Colonial Office and the Population Question in the British Empire, 1918–62,” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 27, no. 3 (09 1999): 61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65. Johnson, Howard, “The West Indies and the Conversion of the British Official Classes to the Development Idea,” Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 15, no. 1 (1977): 55–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pearce, R. D., The Turning Point in Africa: British Colonial Policy, 1938–1948 (London, 1982)Google Scholar; Hetherington, Penelope, British Paternalism and Africa, 1920–1940 (London, 1978)Google Scholar; Constantine, Stephen, The Making of British Colonial Development Policy, 1914–1940 (London, 1984)Google Scholar; Lewis, J. E., “‘ Tropical East Ends’ and the Second World War: Some Contradictions in Colonial Office Welfare Initiatives,” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 28, no. 2 (2000): 42–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

66. Hodge, Joseph, “Science, Development, and Empire: The Colonial Advisory Council on Agriculture and Animal Health, 1929–43,” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 30, no. 1 (2002): 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

67. Jeffries, Charles, Whitehall and the Colonial Service: An Administrative Memoir, 1939–1956 (London, 1972), 9–17Google Scholar, and idem, The Colonial Office (London, 1956), 24–115. Kirk-Greene, Anthony, On Crown Service: A History of HM Colonial and Overseas Services, 1837–1997 (London, 1999)Google Scholar.

68. CO 323/1523/1,2 Population Problems in the Colonies, 1937, 1938.

69. CO 859/125/8, Social Service–Census, 1944.

70. Reichman, Shalom, Katz, Yossi, and Paz, Yair, “The Absorptive Capacity of Palestine, 1882–1948,” Middle Eastern Studies 33, no. 2 (1997): 338–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71. CO 733/387 Palestine–Settled Population–Proportion of Jews to Arabs, 1938; CO 733/415/1 Palestine–Fertility of Marriage, 1939; CO 733/409/6 Policy Settled Population: Proportion of Jews to Arabs 1939.

72. El-Eini, Roza I. M., “The Implementation of British Agricultural Policy in Palestine in the 1930s,” Middle Eastern Studies 32, no. 4 (1996): 211–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

73. CO 318/445/5, Royal Commission on the West Indies–Report and Recommendations–Population, 1940; CO 859/62/16 Birth Control in the West Indies, 1941–42.

74. Glass, Population Movements, 219–314; Kuczynski, Robert, “Living Space” and Population Problems (Oxford, 1939)Google Scholar.

75. Thompson, Danger Spots, 292–93; Carr-Saunders, World Population, 136.

76. Thompson, Danger Spots. See also Crocker, W. R., The Japanese Population Problem: The Coming Crisis (New York, 1932)Google Scholar, and Penrose, E. F., Population Problems and Their Application with Special Reference to Japan (Palo Alto, 1934)Google Scholar.

77. Lee, J. M. and Petter, Martin, The Colonial Office, War and Development Policy (London, 1982)Google Scholar. See also Ingram, Barbara, “Shaping Opinion on Development Policy: Economists at the Colonial Office During World War II,” History of Political Economy 24, no. 3 (1992): 689–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

78. Foreign Office (hereafter FO,) 922/172 Middle East Supply Centre, Populations 1942.

79. Foreign Office Papers, Public Record Office (hereafter FO) 371/34461, 34662, 34662, 1943 for Germany, FO 371/54087, 1946 for Japan, FO 371/73151, 69153, 1948, FO 371/79534, 1949 for Italy.

80. CO 859/62/17 Birth Control–West Africa, 1943; CO 859/62/16 Birth Control in the West Indies, 1941–42; Papers of the Colonial Social Science Research Council, CRC 194, CSRCC (31); CSSRC 44(8), London School of Economics Archives; CO 859/79/11 Social Service 1943 Colonial Research Social Studies CO 927/10/1 Demography–Social Service–Research, 1944; CO 927/10/1 Demography, 1945 Social Service Research.

81. Cabinet (CAB) 124/1033 Dispersal of Population and Industry throughout the Commonwealth 1947–48.

82. FO 921/347 Middle East Office Scientific Advisory Mission, Middle East Supply Centre, 1945; CO 927/73 The Affect of Raising the Standard of Living on the Birth Rate and Increase in Population in the Middle East and Tropical Africa, 1948.

83. CO 537/4472 World Food Supplies–Strategic Aspects of World Food Production, 1949.

84. FO 371/73151, 1948, Italian Labour in Africa, FO 381 79534/File 1823 1949 Italian Emigration, FO 371/69153 File J 5392 Association of Italy with African Development, 1948.

85. CO 927/72/1–4 Demography and Census–UNESCO–Population Commission, 1946–48.

86. FO 371/178333 UN Department Population Increase, 1964; FO 371/183681 Control of Population Increase 1965 File US 1822/2; Ministry of Overseas Development (hereafter OD) 12/28 UNESCO 14th Session Pop Commission Agenda and Briefs 1967–69.

87. King, “The Politics of Social Research,” 432–42.

88. Soloway, Demography, 330–50; Winter, “Population,” 458–60.

89. Cooper, Frederick, “Modernizing Bureaucrats, Backward Africans, and the Development Concept,” in Cooper, Frederick and Packard, Randall, eds., International Development and the Social Sciences (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1997), 64–92Google Scholar; Stockwell, A. J., “British Imperial Policy and Decolonization in Malaya, 1942–52,” Journal of Commonwealth and Imperial History 13, no. 1 (1984): 68–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cowen, Michael and Shenton, Robert, “The Origin and Course of Fabian Colonialism in Africa,” Journal of Historical Sociology 4, no. 2 (1991): 143–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

90. Davis, Kingsley, “The World Demographic Transition,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 237 (1945): 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Notestein, Frank, “Population: The Long View,” in Schultz, Theodore, ed., Food for the World (Chicago, 1945), 36–57Google Scholar.

91. Hodgson, “Demography,” 9–29; Sharpless, “World Population Growth,” 81–87; Szreter, “Demographic Transition,” 663–82.

92. This was the thrust of a postwar war analysis of population pressure in Africa. CO 859/154/6 Social Service–Medical–Population, 1948.

93. See Cooper, Frederick, Decolonization and African Society (Cambridge, 1996), 323–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Waters, Chris, “Dark Strangers in Our Midst: Discourses of Race and Nation in Britain, 1947–1963,” Journal of British Studies 36 (04 1997): 207–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

94. See Sharpless, John, “Population Science, Private Foundations, and Development Aid: The Transformation of Demographic Knowledge in the United States, 1945–1965,” in Cooper, and Packard, , eds., International Development, 176–200Google Scholar.

95. Grebenik, “Demographic Research,” 18–20.

96. CO 927/10/3 Research Social Services Demography and Census, 1946.

97. CRC 218 Letter from Sir George Gater, 12–10–45, LSE Archives.

98. By the mid-1950s, the Colonial Office held regular meetings of government statisticians and both West and East Africa had their own social science research groups.

99. Grebenik, “Demographic Research,” 22.

100. CO 859/154/6 Social Service, Medical, Population, 1948; CO 927/73/2 Demography and Census Effect of Increasing Population on Food Supplies, 1948.

101. CO 318/495/4 Population Problems West Indies, 1948; Population Problems–West Indies, 1949, CO 318/495/5; Population Problems–West Indies, 1951, CO 318/511/9. As early as 1945, European political representatives in East Africa raised the issue of African population increase. Memo on Colonial Medical Policy 1945–48, CO 859/155/1. It was also discussed in the report of the East African Commission in the 1950s. East Africa Commission Section A Population, CO 892/3/10. CO 1034/16 2nd Conference of Colonial Government Statisticians, 1953–54; CO 1023 212 Commission of Inquiry to Investigate Population Problems–Fiji, 1952–53.

102. CAB 124/2843 World Food Supplies and Population Trends Papers by Professor Zuckerman 1948–58; OD 25/225 Natural Resources, FAO and Voluntary Organizations Department, Population Control Committee on World Population Correspondence and Draft Papers 1967–69 CAB 168/240 Population Control 1969.

103. José Harris, “Economic Knowledge and British Social Policy,” in Furner and Supple, State and Economic Knowledge, 379–400.

104. Ittmann, “The Colonial Office,” 71–75.

105. OD 10/32 Department of Technical Co-operation Social Development Department, Population Control Policy 1961–63; OD 10/33 Department of Technical Cooperation Social Development Department, Population Control Policy 1961–63; OD 10/57 DTC's Current Review of Policy Questions: Social Development Department's View 1964.

106. OD 25/222 Population Control General Policy Part A 1967–69; OD 25/224 Population Control General Policy Part C 1967–69; OD 25/242 Population Control, Proposed Population Bureau, Parts A, B 1967–69.

107. Langford, PIC, 10–16, and Soloway, Demography, 337–39; Glass, David, ed., The University Teaching of Social Sciences: Demography (UNESCO, 1957)Google Scholar.

108. See note 3.

109. This continuity is one of the central themes in Lewis, Empire and State Building.