Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T06:29:59.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

History and Political Science: Together Again?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Julian E. Zelizer
Julian E. Zelizer
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Albany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There was a period in America when the political science and history disciplines were not that far apart. Both approaches to analyzing civil society had evolved out of an old Anglo-American tradition where these two subjects, along with philosophy and literature, were all considered in relationship to one another. During the formative years of the American research university, which took place at the turn of the twentieth century, both disciplines shared common founding fathers. A classic example was Charles Beard, whose influence spanned both areas of scholarship. Indeed, it was a breakaway faction of the American Historical Association that formed the American Political Science Association.

Type
Roundtable: State-of-the-Field: American Political History
Information
Journal of Policy History , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 126 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Beard, Charles, An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States (New York, 1913)Google Scholar.

2. Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr., The Coming of the New Deal (Boston, 1959)Google Scholar; Hawley, Ellis, The New Deal and the Problem of Monopoly: A Study in Economic Ambivalence (Princeton, 1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bentley, Arthur F., The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures (Chicago, 1908)Google Scholar; Hartz, Louis, The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought Since the Revolution (New York, 1955)Google Scholar.

3. Hofstadter, Richard, The Age of Reform: From Bryan to F.D.R. (New York, 1955)Google Scholar.

4. Kolko, Gabriel, The Triumph of Conservatism: A Reinterpretation of American History, 1900–1916 (New York, 1963)Google Scholar; Weinstein, James, The Corporate Ideal in the Liberal State, 1900–1918 (Boston, 1968)Google Scholar.

5. Ross, Dorothy, The Origins of American Social Science (Cambridge, 1991)Google Scholar.

6. Derthick, Martha, Policymaking for Social Security (Washington, D.C., 1979)Google Scholar; Heclo, Hugh, Government of Strangers: Executive Politics in Washington (Washington, D.C., 1977)Google Scholar; Sundquist, James L., Politics and Policy: The Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson Years (Washington, D.C., 1968)Google Scholar; Rogin, Michael P., The Intellectuals and McCarthy: The Radical Specter (Cambridge, Mass., 1967)Google Scholar.

7. Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (New York, 1973)Google Scholar.

8. Silbey, Joel H., Bogue, Allan G., and Flanigan, William H., eds., The History of American Electoral Behavior (Princeton, 1978)Google Scholar.

9. Galambos, Louis, “The Emerging Organizational Synthesis in Modern American History,” Business History Review 44 (1970): 279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, “Technology, Political Economy, and Professionalization,” Business History Review 57 (1983): 471–93.

10. Zelizer, Julian E., “Clio's Lost Tribe: Public Policy History Since 1978,” Journal of Policy History 12 (2000): 369–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11. Zelizer, Julian E., “Beyond the Presidential Synthesis: Reordering Political Time,” in A Companion to Post-1945 America, ed. Agnew, Jean-Christophe and Rosenzweig, Roy (Oxford, 2002), 345–370Google Scholar.

12. Zelizer, Julian E., “Stephen Skowronek's Building a New American State and the Origins of American Political Development,” Social Science History 27 (Fall 2003): 425–441Google Scholar.

13. Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, eds., Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge, 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Weir, Margaret, Orloff, Ann Shola, and Skocpol, Theda, eds., The Politics of Social Policy in the United States (Princeton, 1988)Google Scholar; Bensel, Richard, Sectionalism and American Political Development, 1880–1980 (Madison, 1984)Google Scholar; Skowronek, Stephen, Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920 (Cambridge, 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sanders, Elizabeth M., The Regulation of Natural Gas: Policy and Politics, 1938–1978 (Philadelphia, 1981)Google Scholar; Katznelson, Ira, City Trenches: Urban Politics and the Patterning of Class in the United States (New York, 1981)Google Scholar.

14. Skowronek, Stephen, The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to George Bush (Cambridge, Mass., 1993)Google Scholar.

15. Balogh, Brian, Chain Reaction: Expert Debate and Public Participation in American Commercial Nuclear Power, 1945–1975 (Cambridge, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16. Berkowitz, Edward D., Disabled Policy: America's Program for the Handicapped (Cambridge, 1987)Google Scholar; idem, America's Welfare State: From Roosevelt to Reagan (Baltimore, 1991); idem, Mr. Social Security: The Life of Wilbur J. Cohen (Lawrence, Kan., 1995).

17. John, Richard R., Spreading the News: The American Postal System from Franklin to Morse (Cambridge, Mass., 1995)Google Scholar.

18. Zelizer, Julian E., Taxing America: Wilbur D. Mills, Congress, and the State, 1945–1975 (Cambridge, 1998)Google Scholar.

19. Heclo, Hugh, “Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment,” in The New American Political System, ed. King, Anthony (Washington, D.C., 1978), 90–121Google Scholar; Kingdon, John W., Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (Boston, 1984)Google Scholar; Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D., Agendas and Instabilities in American Politics (Chicago, 1993)Google Scholar.

20. Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen V., eds., Political Science: State of the Discipline (New York, 2002)Google Scholar.

21. See, for example, Putnam, Robert D., Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Skocpol, Theda and Fiorina, Morris P., eds., Civic Engagement in American Democracy (Washington, D.C., and New York, 1999)Google Scholar.

22. Kat Lehman Schozman, “Citizen Participation in America: What Do We Know? Why Do We Care?” in Political Science, 433–61.

23. Dawson, Michael C., Black Visions: The Roots of Contemporary African American Political Ideologies (Chicago, 2001)Google Scholar; idem, Behind the Mule: Race, Class, and African American Politics (Princeton, 2000); and Cohen, Cathy J., The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS and the Breakdown of Black Politics (Chicago, 1999)Google Scholar.

24. See, for example, Oliver, Eric, Democracy in Suburbia (Princeton, 2001)Google Scholar.

25. Hochschild, Jennifer L., Facing Up to the American Dream (Princeton, 1995)Google Scholar; Lieberman, Robert C., Shifting the Color Line: Race and the American Welfare State (Cambridge, Mass., 1998)Google Scholar; Smith, Rogers M., Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U.S. History (New Haven, 1997)Google Scholar; Gilens, Martin, Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy (Chicago, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26. Michael C. Dawson and Cathy Cohen, “Problems in the Study of the Politics of Race,” in Political Science, 488–510.

27. Jeffry Frieden and Lisa L. Martin, “International Political Economy: Global and Domestic Interactions,” in Political Science, 118–46.

28. Rodgers, Daniel T., Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Era (Cambridge, 1998)Google Scholar.

29. Pierson, Paul, Politics in Time (Princeton, forthcoming, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30. Some notable exceptions by historians that look into their craft include Novick, Peter, That Noble Dream: The ‘Objectivity Question’ and the American Historical Profession (Cambridge, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Appleby, Joyce, Hunt, Lynn, and Jacobs, Margaret, Telling the Truth About History (New York, 1994)Google Scholar; Higham, John, History: Professional Scholarship in America, rev. ed. (Baltimore, 1983)Google Scholar; Pocock, J. G. A., Politics, Language, and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History (Chicago, 1989)Google Scholar; Bloch, Marc, Historian's Craft (New York, 1953)Google Scholar.

31. See, for examples, Pierson, Politics in Time; Bensel, Richard, “Of Rules and Speakers: Toward a Theory of Institutional Change for the U.S. House of Representatives,” Social Science History 24 (Summer 2000): 349–366Google Scholar; Clemens, Elizabeth S. and Cook, James M., “Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change,” Annual Review of Sociology 25 (1999): 441–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Orren, Karen and Skowronek, Stephen, “Regimes and Regime Building in American Government: A Review of Literature on the 1940s,” Political Science Quarterly 113 (1998–1999): 689–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32. See, for example, Zelizer, Julian E., On Capitol Hill: The Struggle to Reform Congress and Its Consequences, 1948–2000 (Cambridge, 2004)Google Scholar.

33. Mayhew, David R., “Supermajority Rule in the U.S. Senate,” PS: Political Science & Politics 26 (01 2003): 31–36Google Scholar.

34. Pierson, Politics in Time.

35. Novick, That Noble Dream.