Last updated 09/07/24: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 April 2009
“Coal is, perhaps, the most indispensable article used by man. Without it, in time, we should return to a state of barbarism.” So proclaimed the president of Pennsylvania's Pequa Railroad and Improvement Company in 1849. The importance of coal, the official explained, lay in its utility as an energy source, for which he hailed it as unsurpassed: coal was “‘hoarded labor’”—a “treasure reserved by nature to promote and perfect our civilization.” The railroad official's florid tribute to the mineral fuel was hardly disinterested: the Pequa Railroad had ambitious plans to ship a great deal of coal. Yet it effectively underscored the enormous role of coal in nineteenth-century America. It was an age in which, as countless industry boosters proclaimed, coal was king.
1. Report to the Directors of the Pequa Railroad and Improvement Company (Philadelphia, 1849), 4Google Scholar.
2. Schurr, Sam H. and Netschert, Bruce C., Energy in the American Economy, 1850–1975: An Economic Study of Its History and Prospects (Baltimore, 1960), 36–37Google Scholar.
3. Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., “Anthracite Coal and the Beginnings of the Industrial Revolution in the United States,” Business History Review 46 (Summer 1972): 180CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rosenberg, Nathan, Technology and American Economic Growth (White Plains, N.Y., 1972), 75–86Google Scholar; Nye, David E., Consuming Power: A Social History of American Energies (Cambridge, Mass., 1998), 78Google Scholar. “Directly or indirectly,” Nye concluded, “coal and steam seemed to improve every area of life except air quality” (89). See also Eliasburg, Vera F., “Some Aspects of Development in the Coal Mining Industry, 1839–1918,” in National Bureau of Economic Research, Output, Employment, and Productivity in the United States After 1800: Studies in Income and Wealth (New York, 1966), 30, 405–39Google Scholar; Wright, Gavin, “The Origins of American Economic Success, 1879–1940,” American Economic Review 80 (09 1990): 651–668Google Scholar. Dolores Greenberg denied that steam power was a leading force in nineteenth-century industrialization, contending, on the contrary, that people and animals remained the “major converters of fuel into work” and the “most important sources of power in the United States in 1850, and even as late as 1880.” Greenberg, Dolores, “Reassessing the Power Patterns of the Industrial Revolution: An Anglo-American Comparison,” American Historical Review 87 (12 1982): 1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Greenberg's stimulating essay provides a valuable corrective to coal industry boosterism; still, coal did furnish urbanites with an affordable source of heat and was also a critically important motive power in strategic industries such as iron and steel.
4. Hamilton, Alexander, Official Report on Publick Credit (Washington, D.C., 1790), 249–250Google Scholar; Coxe, Tench, A View of the United States (Philadelphia, 1794), 180–181Google Scholar; Gallatin, Albert, “Report on Roads and Canals,” in American State Papers, Miscellaneous (Washington, D.C., 1834), 1:760Google Scholar.
5. “Duty on Coal,” 1798, in American State Papers, Documents, Legislative and Executive (Washington, D.C., 1832), 5:553Google Scholar. Price calculations for the early republic are based on Arthur Cole's estimations of wholesale price of coal in New York City in 1812, which fluctuated between $27 and $28 a chaldron. See Cole, Arthur, Wholesale Commodity Prices in the United States, 1700–1861 (Cambridge, Mass., 1938), 164, 178CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Taussig, F. W., The Tariff History of the United States, 8th ed. (New York, 1931), 17Google Scholar; Eavenson, Howard, The First Century and a Quarter of American Coal Industry (Pittsburgh, 1942), 433–434, 436Google Scholar. See also Nettels, Curtis P., The Emergence of a National Economy, 1775–1815 (New York, 1962), 324–335Google Scholar.
6. Grammar, John, “Account of the Coal Mines in the Vicinity of Richmond, Virginia,” American Journal of Science 1 (1818): 128Google Scholar; Ruffin, Edmund, “Notes of a Three-Days Excursion into Goochland, Chesterfield, and Powhatan,” Farmer's Register 1 (09 1837)Google Scholar. For more on the Richmond coalfield, see Lewis, Ronald, Coal, Iron, and Slaves: Industrial Slavery in Maryland and Virginia, 1715–1865 (Westport, Conn., 1979), 55–66Google Scholar, and Adams, Sean Patrick, Old Dominion, Industrial Commonwealth: Coal, Politics, and Economy in Antebellum America (Baltimore, 2004), 25–47Google Scholar.
7. Hazard, Erskine, “History of the Introduction of Anthracite Coal into Philadelphia,” Memoirs of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania 2 (1827): 157–164Google Scholar; Binder, Frederick, “Anthracite Enters the American Home,” Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 82 (01 1958): 82–99Google Scholar; Powell, H. Benjamin, Philadelphia's First Fuel Crisis: Jacob Cist and the Developing Market for Pennsylvania Anthracite (University Park, Pa., 1980), 40–43Google Scholar; Adams, Old Dominion, Industrial Commonwealth, 74–80.
8. Walter Johnson, A Report to the Navy Department of the United States on American Coals, Applicable to Steam Navigation and to Other Purposes, 28th Cong., 1st sess., 1844, H. Doc. 276, serial 444, 600. Johnson played a significant role in the promotion of anthracite for both government and industry. See, for example, Johnson, Walter R., Notes on the Use of Anthracite in the Manufacture of Iron, With Some Remarks on its Evaporating Power (Boston, 1841)Google Scholar.
9. Memorial of Citizens of Massachusetts, 31st Cong., 1st sess., 1850, Sen. Misc. Doc 117, serial 563; Report of the Committee on Naval Affairs, 32d Cong., 1st sess., 1852, Sen. Rep. 356, serial 631, 9; Niles's National Register 67 (18 January 1845): 309.
10. MacFarlane, James, The Coal-Regions of America: Their Topography, Geology, and Development (New York, 1873), 161Google Scholar.
11. On the transportation network that served Pennsylvania's anthracite coalfields, see Gibbons, Edward, “The Building of the Schuylkill Navigation System, 1815–1828,” Pennsylvania History 57 (01 1990): 13–43Google Scholar, and Hoffman, John, “Anthracite in the Lehigh Valley of Pennsylvania, 1820–1845,” United States National Museum Bulletin 252 (1968): 91–141Google Scholar. For more detailed and institutionally oriented accounts, see Jones, Chester Lloyd, The Economic History of the Anthracite-Tidewater Canals (Philadelphia, 1908)Google Scholar, and Bogen, Jules I., The Anthracite Railroads: A Study in American Railroad Enterprise (New York, 1927)Google Scholar.
12. For a detailed analysis of how ordinary miners met the challenge posed by the low barriers to entry, see the appendix to Wallace, Anthony F. C., St. Clair: A Nineteenth Century Coal Town's Experience with a Disaster-Prone Industry (New York, 1987), 446–456Google Scholar.
13. Taylor, George, Effect of Incorporated Coal Companies upon the Anthracite Coal Trade of Pennsylvania (Pottsville, Pa., 1833), 4Google Scholar.
14. 1Yearley, Clifton K., Enterprise and Anthracite: Economics and Democracy in Schuylkill County, 1820–1875 (Baltimore, 1961)Google Scholar; Adams, Sean Patrick, “Special Privilege vs. General Utility: Corporate Chartering in the Pennsylvania Coal Industry, 1849–1874,” Essays in Business and Economic History 15 (1997): 121–134Google Scholar.
15. Childs, C. G., Pennsylvania the Pioneer in Internal Improvements: The Coal and Iron Trade, Embracing Statistics of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, 1847), 9Google Scholar.
16. For an analysis of how federalism shaped the structure of the railroad industry in the early republic, see Dunlavy, Colleen A., Politics and Industrialization: Early Railroads in the United States and Prussia (Princeton, 1996)Google Scholar. On the influence of federalism on public works, see Larson, John Lauritz, Internal Improvement: National Public Works and the Promise of Popular Government in the Early United States (Chapel Hill, 2001)Google Scholar. On the influence of federalism in communications, see John, Richard R., Spreading the News: The American Postal System from Franklin to Morse (Cambridge, Mass., 1995)Google Scholar.
17. Hendrickson, Walter B., “Nineteenth-Century State Geological Surveys: Early Government Support of Science,” Isis 52 (09 1961): 357–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rabbit, Mary C., Mineral Lands and Geology for the Common Defense and General Welfare, vol. 1, Before 1879 (Washington, D.C., 1979), 30–57Google Scholar; Millbrook, Anne, “State Geological Surveys of the Nineteenth Century” (Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania, 1981), 143–155Google Scholar; Turner, Stephen P., “The Survey in Nineteenth-Century American Geology: The Evolution of a Form of Patronage,” Minerva 25 (Autumn 1987): 282–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar; MacFarlane, Coal Regions of America, iii.
18. Packer, S. J., Report of the Committee of the Senate of Pennsylvania, Upon the Subject of the Coal Trade (Harrisburg, 1834), 11Google Scholar; U.S. Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970 (Washington, D.C., 1975), 580Google Scholar.
19. Hunter, Louis and Bryant, Lynwood, A History of Industrial Power in the United States, 1780–1930, vol. 3, The Transmission of Power (Cambridge, Mass., 1991), 418–419Google Scholar; “Mining in Wall Street,” Mining Magazine 4 (04 1855): 3Google Scholar.
20. Morris, Israel Jr., Coal Price Current, Being Comparative Prices of Anthracite With American and Imported Bituminous Coal (Philadelphia, 1870)Google Scholar. See also DeCanio, Stephen J. and Mokyr, Joel, “Inflation and Wage Lag During the American Civil War,” Explorations in Economic History 14 (11 1977): 315CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bogen, Anthracite Railroads, 47–49; Martin, Albro, Railroads Triumphant: The Growth, Rejection, and Rebirth of a Vital American Force (New York, 1992), 143–144Google Scholar.
21. For a more detailed account of the adoption by a nineteenth-century firm of a corporate charter, see the case study of the Corliss Steam Engine Company in Lamoreaux, Naomi, “Partnerships, Corporations, and the Limits on Contractual Freedom in U.S. History: An Essay in Economics, Law, and Culture,” in Constructing Corporate America: History, Politics, Culture, ed. Lipartito, Kenneth and Sicilia, David B. (New York, 2004), 35–38Google Scholar.
22. Miners' Journal (Pottsville, Pa.), 23 January, 26 March 1864; 21 January 1865; 20 January 1866. The quotation is from 26 March 1864. The data on the chartering of West Virginia coal mines is drawn from the list of charters granted in 1865. Laws of West Virginia, 1866 (Wheeling, 1866), 141–266Google Scholar. The rise of incorporation in coal mining was part of a broader national trend. For a variety of perspectives on the wider phenomenon, see Hurst, James Willard, The Legitimacy of the Business Corporation in the Law of the United States, 1780–1970 (Charlottesville, 1970)Google Scholar; Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Cambridge, Mass., 1977)Google Scholar; Hovenkamp, Herbert, Enterprise and American Law, 1836–1937 (Cambridge, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bowman, Scott, The Modern Corporation and American Political Thought: Law, Power, and Ideology (University Park, Pa., 1996)Google Scholar; and Roy, William G., Socializing Capital: The Rise of the Large Industrial Corporation in America (Princeton, 1997)Google Scholar.
23. Laws of Pennsylvania, 1861 (Harrisburg, 1861), 410–411Google Scholar; Laws of Pennsylvania, 1869 (Harrisburg, 1869), 31–32Google Scholar; Bogen, Anthracite Railroads, 47–49.
24. Miners' Journal (Pottsville, Pa.), 19 03 1864Google Scholar; Laws of Pennsylvania, 1861 (Harrisburg, 1861), 410–411Google Scholar; Laws of Pennsylvania, 1869 (Harrisburg, 1869), 31–32Google Scholar; The Coal Monopoly. Correspondence Between B. B. Thomas, President of the Thomas Coal Company, and F. B. Gowen, President of the Philadelphia and Reading Company (Philadelphia, 1873), 8Google Scholar; Wallace, St. Clair, 403–17; Rottenberg, Dan, In the Kingdom of Coal: An American Family and the Rock That Changed the World (New York, 2003), 47–48Google Scholar.
25. Railroads played a major role in developing new coal regions, particularly in southern Appalachia. Yet even when railroads controlled vast swaths of coal-bearing land, they were mostly unable to manipulate the price of coal. In fact, many late nineteenth-century railroads acquired coal lands to guarantee themselves a steady supply of coal for them-selves—rather than, like Franklin Gowen, to try to corner the market. On the developmental role of railroads in Appalachia, see Lambie, Joseph, From Mine to Market: The History Coal Transportation on the Norfolk and Western Railway (New York, 1954)Google Scholar; Eller, Ron, Miners, Millhands, and Mountaineers: Industrialization of the Appalachian South, 1880–1930 (Knoxville, 1982)Google Scholar; and Noe, Kenneth, Southwest Virginia's Railroad: Modernization and the Sectional Crisis (Urbana, 1994)Google Scholar.
26. Harvey, Katherine A., The Best Dressed Miners: Life and Labor in the Maryland Coal Region, 1835–1910 (Ithaca, 1969), 12–13Google Scholar; Laws of West Virginia, 1863 (Wheeling, 1863), 165; Laws of West Virginia, 1869, 113; Davis to John King, 3 August 1868; Davis to William E. Stevenson, 7 May 1869; Davis to Nathan Goff, 7 May 1869; Davis to J. W. Garrett and John King, 27 May 1869; all in Henry Gassaway Davis Papers, West Virginia Collection, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
27. Long, Priscilla, Where the Sun Never Shines: A History of America's Bloody Coal Industry (New York, 1989), 188–190Google Scholar; Laws of West Virginia, 1867 (Wheeling, 1868), 102–105Google Scholar; Lambie, Mine to Market; Ron Eller, Miners, Millhands, and Mountaineers, 48–52; Warren, Kenneth, Triumphant Capitalism: Henry Clay Frick and the Industrial Transformation of America (Pittsburgh, 1996), 28–38Google Scholar.
28. The quotation is from Long, Where the Sun Never Shines, 55. The story of labor organization in the late nineteenth-century coalfields is too extensive a topic to treat here in detail. For an introduction, see Roy, Andrew, A History of the Coal Miners of the United States (Columbus, Ohio, 1907)Google Scholar; Wieck, Edward, The American Miners' Association: A Record the Origin of Coal Miner's Unions in the United States (New York, 1940)Google Scholar; Selztzer, Curtis, Fire the Hole: Miners and Managers in the American Coal Industry (Lexington, Ky., 1985), 1–33Google Scholar; Blatz, Perry, Democratic Miners: Work and Labor Relations in the Anthracite Coal Industry, 1875–1925 (Albany, 1994)Google Scholar; and Letwin, Daniel, The Challenge of Interracial Unionism: Alabama Coal Miners, 1878–1921 (Chapel Hill, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
29. Coleman, J. Walter, Labor Disturbances in Pennsylvania, 1850–1880 (Washington, D.C., 1936), 40–49Google Scholar; Shankman, Arnold, “Draft Resistance in Civil War Pennsylvania,” Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 101 (04 1977): 190–204Google Scholar; Palladino, Grace, Another Civil War: Labor, Capital, and the State in the Anthracite Region of Pennsylvania, 1840–1868 (Urbana, 1990), 140–162Google Scholar; Shalloo, J. P., Private Police: With Special Reference to Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, 1933), 58–65Google Scholar.
30. Arnold, Andrew B., “Between the Laws: Informal Definitions of Job and Property Rights in Central Pennsylvania, 1870–1884,” Pennsylvania History 70 (Winter 2003): 47Google Scholar; Long, Where the Sun Never Shines, 145.
31. Harvey, Best Dressed Miners, 177–80; Seltzer, Fire in the Hole, 24–28; Long, Where the Sun Never Shines, 140–51. For more on the social and cultural dimensions of the Workingman's Benevolent Association and the Molly Maguires, see Kenney, Kevin, Making Sense of the Molly Maguires (New York, 1998)Google Scholar.
32. Lewis, Ronald, Black Coal Miners in America: Race, Class, and Community Conflict, 1780–1980 (Lexington, Ky., 1987), 39–57Google Scholar; Letwin, Challenge of Interracial Unionism, 1–7, 55–87.
33. Fishback, Price, Soft Coal, Hard Choices: The Economic Welfare of Bituminous Coal Miners, 1890–1930 (New York, 1992), 11–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Although Fishback focused on the period after 1890, his analysis of miners' strategic choices held true for the pre-1890 period as well.
34. Historical Statistics, 580; Arnold, “Between the Laws,” 47.
35. Wallace, St. Clair, 296–302; Trachtenberg, Alexander, The History of Legislation for the Protection of Coal Miners in Pennsylvania, 1824–1915 (New York, 1942), 19, 38–39, 48–72Google Scholar.
36. Long, Where the Sun Never Shines, 47–48, 66; Historical Statistics, 607. The federal government did not create a national organization to deal with mine safety until 1910, when it established the United States Bureau of Mines.
37. Rabbitt, Minerals, Lands, and Geology, 263–88, quotation on 280; Turner, “The Survey in Nineteenth-Century American Geology,” 309–30.
38. U.S. Statutes at Large 13 (1865): 343–344Google Scholar; Rabbitt, Minerals, Lands, and Geology, 146; Leshy, John, The Mining Law: A Study in Perpetual Motion (Washington, D.C., 1987)Google Scholar.
