Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T20:36:21.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adolescents’ Beliefs About Why Young People Commit Crime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2013

Grace Skrzypiec
Grace Skrzypiec*
Affiliation:
School of Education, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Grace Skrzypiec, School of Education, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001 SA, Australia. Email: grace.skrzypiec@flinders.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

The aim of the study was to obtain adolescents’ perspectives about why young people offend. Twenty-four Australian male and female offenders and non-offenders offered insights about what, according to them, motivates young people to become involved in crime. Without the use of sophisticated language, participants offered explanations that were well-aligned with the ‘big three’ theories suggested by Cullen and Agnew (2003) as major criminological theories — namely, control, differential association, and strain theories. Participants also provided explanations that corroborated Carroll, Houghton, Durkin, and Hattie's (2009) reputation enhancing goals theory. Participants’ explanations were consistent with empirically supported criminological theories, suggesting that young people involved in crime, or associated with known offenders, have insights about the causes of crime. An extrapolation of this notion would suggest that they might also have some insight into what measures could be taken to reduce or prevent offending. Notwithstanding further research, it is proposed that young people should be given more voice in criminal justice matters.

Keywords

adolescent offenderscrime theorieschild perspectivechild voicecauses of crime
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools , Volume 23 , Special Issue 2: Wellbeing and the prevention of violence in young people , December 2013 , pp. 185 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Australian Academic Press Pty Ltd 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, L.S. (2006). Listening to juvenile offenders: Can residential treatment prevent recidivism? Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 23 (1), 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, R. (1995). Testing the leading crime theories: An alternative strategy focusing on motivational processes. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32 (4), 363–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, R. (2003). The interactive effects of social control variables on delinquency. In Britt, C.L. & Gottfredson, M.R. (Eds.), Control theories of crime and delinquency. Advances in criminological theory, Vol. 12 (pp. 53–76). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Agnew, R. (2005). Why do criminals offend? A general theory of crime and delinquency. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Akers, R.L. (1985). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Akers, R.L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Akers, R.L. (2003). A social learning theory of crime. In Cullen, F.T. & Agnew, R. (Eds.), Criminological theory. Past to present: Essential readings (2nd ed., pp. 92–102). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Akers, R.L., & Sellers, C.S. (2004). Criminological theories: Introduction, evaluation, and application (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Aubrey, C., & Dahl, S. (2006). Children's voices: The views of vulnerable children on their service providers and the relevance of services they receive. British Journal of Social Work, 36, 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Arieh, A. (2000). Beyond welfare: measuring and monitoring the state of children — New trends and domains. Social Indicators Research, 52 (3), 235–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Arieh, A. (2005). Where are the children? Children's role in measuring and monitoring their well-being. Social Indicators Research, 74, 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, T.J., & Snipes, J.B. (1996). Theoretical integration in criminology. Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, 20, 301–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, R.M. (1992). Radical criminology. Criminology, 19, 565–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, A., Houghton, S., Durkin, K., & Hattie, J.A. (2009). Adolescent reputations and risk: Developmental trajectories to delinquency. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casas, F. (2000). Quality of life and the life experience of children. In Verhellen, E. (Ed.), Fifth international interdisciplinary course on children's rights. Belgium: University of Ghent.Google Scholar
Chesney-Lind, M. (1989). Girl's crime and woman's place: Toward a feminist model of female delinquency. Crime and Delinquency, 35, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloward, R.A., & Ohlin, L.E. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, A.K. (1955). Delinquent boys: The culture of the gang. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Cullen, F.T., & Agnew, R. (2003). Criminological theory: Past to present, essential readings (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.Google Scholar
Cullen, F.T., Wright, J.P., & Blevins, K.R. (2009). Taking stock: The status of criminological theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Edleson, J.L., Nguyen, H.T., & Kimball, E. (2011). Honor our voices: A guide for practice when responding to children exposed to domestic violence. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Center Against Violence and Abuse (MINCAVA).Google Scholar
Elliott, E.S., & Dweck, C.S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (1), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, L., & Walsh, A. (1999). Criminology: A global perspective. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Emler, N., & Reicher, S.Adolescence and delinquency. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Farrington, D.P. (2003). Developmental and life-course criminology: Key theoretical and empirical issues — The 2002 Sutherland Award Address. Criminology, 41 (2), 221–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, D.P., & Welsh, B.C. (2007). Saving children from a life of crime. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, G. (2013). Australian crime: Facts and figures 2012. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
Gaylord, M.S., & Galliher, J.F. (1988). The criminology of Edward Sutherland. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, M.R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfredson, M.R., & Hirschi, T. (2003). Self control and opportunity. In Britt, C.L. & Gottfredson, M.R. (Eds.), Control theories of crime and delinquency (pp. 5–19). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Hay, C. (2001). An exploratory test of Braithwaite's reintegrative shaming theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 132–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimer, K., & De Coster, S. (1999). The gendering of violent delinquency. Criminology, 37, 277–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M.R. (1994). The generality of deviance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Jensen, G.F. (1995). Salvaging structure through strain: A theoretical and empirical critique. In Adler, F. & Laufer, W.S. (Eds.), Advances in criminological theory, volume 6: The legacy of anomie (pp. 139–158). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, R. (1978). Social sources of delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leavitt, G. (1999). Criminological theory as an art form: Implications for criminal justice policy. Crime and Delinquency, 45 (3), 389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayall, B. (2002). Towards a sociology of childhood: Thinking from children's lives. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Mazerolle, P., & Maahs, J. (2000). General strain and delinquency: An alternative examination of conditioning influences. Justice Quarterly, 17, 753–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melton, G., & Limber, S. (1992). What children's rights mean to children: Children's own views. In Freeman, M. & Veerman, P. (Eds.), The ideologies of children's rights (pp. 167–187). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R.K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messing, J.T. (2005). From the child's perspective: A qualitative analysis of kinship care placements. Berkeley, CA: National Abandoned Infants Assistance Resource Center, University of California.Google Scholar
Milovanovic, D. (1992). Review essay: Contemporary directions in critical criminology. Humanity and Society, 6, 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paternoster, R., & Mazerolle, P. (1994). General Strain Theory and delinquency: A replication and extension. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 235–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, T.C., & Cullen, F.T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, D., Neiderhiser, N., Hetheringtom, E. M., & Plomin, R. (2000). The relationship code: Deciphering genetic and social influences on adolescent development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ridge, T. (2002). Childhood poverty and social exclusion: From a child's perspective. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, R.J., & Laub, J.H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos Pais, M. (1999). A Human Rights Conceptual Framework for UNICEF. Florence, Italy: UNICEF, International Child Development Centre.Google Scholar
Shaw, C.R., & McKay, H.D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas: A study of rates of delinquents in relation to differential characteristics of local communities in American cities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Skrzypiec, G.K., & Wundersitz, J. (2005). Young people born 1984. Extent of involvement with the juvenile justice system. Adelaide, Australia: Attorney-General's Department, South Australia.Google Scholar
Sommer, D., Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Hundeide, K. (2010). Child perspectives and children's perspectives in theory and practice: International perspectives on early childhood education and development, Vol. 2. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tibbetts, S.G., & Hemmens, C.T. (2010). Criminological theory: A text/reader. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Title, C.R. (1995). Control balance: Toward a general theory of deviance. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Vold, G.B., Bernard, T.J., & Snipes, J.B. (2002). Theoretical criminology (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weatherburn, D. (2001). What causes crime? Crime and Justice Bulletin, Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice Series, no. 54. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar