No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Cutting Class in High School: Counsellor-Student Interactions and Negotiations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2016
Abstract
This paper reports findings from a qualitative study conducted with public high school students and guidance counsellors in the north eastern United States of America to examine how class cutting is understood and addressed. Our findings indicate that interactions between students and guidance counsellors are similar to negotiations. These negotiations, however, are implicit rather than explicit. Explicit negotiations offer guidance counsellors a valuable tool for collaboratively exploring cutting with all relevant parties, including students, teachers, administrators, and parents. Explicit negotiations can examine underlying issues and conflicts precipitating cutting, the social meaning that cutting has for this student, desired outcomes, impediments to these outcomes, and the negotiation process itself. Not only can explicit negotiations aid guidance counsellors learning about and responding to cutting more effectively, but they also can model effective, collaborative problem solving for students and the larger school community.
- Type
- Interventions
- Information
- Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools , Volume 9 , Issue S1: Health, Well-being and Coping in Young People , August 1999 , pp. 185 - 197
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999
References
American School Counsellors Association, Role Statement, Adopted July, 1990. Alexandria, VA: Author.Google Scholar
Berkovich, J. (1984). Social conflicts and third parties: Strategies of conflict resolution. Boulder, Co.: Westview Press Inc.Google Scholar
Boston Bar Association. (1998, July 30). Boston Bar Association Task Force On Children in Need of Services: Report on Truancy. Boston, MA: Author.Google Scholar
Daley, B. (1998, September 2). City sets a hard-line policy on truancy. The Boston Globe, p. Al.Google Scholar
Duckworth, K., & deJung, J. (1989). Inhibiting class cutting among high school students. High School Journal, 72(4), 188–195.Google Scholar
Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban high school. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Frydenberg, E. (1997). Adolescent coping: Theoretical and research perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoyle, J.R. (1993). Our children: drop-outs, pushouts, and burnouts. People and Education, 1(1)26–41.Google Scholar
Lewicki, R.J. (1992) Negotiating strategically. In Cohen, A., (Ed.), The portable MBA in Management (pp. 147–189). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lewicki, R., Litterer, J., Minton, J. & Saunders, D. (1994). Negotiation. Burr Ridge, IL.: Irwin.Google Scholar
Lind, E.A., & Tyler, J.R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, P. (1995). The 1993 Leavers: The Scottish School Leavers' survey. Edinburgh: Scottish Office Education Department.Google Scholar
Minow, M. (1986). Rights for the next generation: A feminist approach to children's rights. Harvard Women's Law Journal, 9, 1–24.Google Scholar
Mulvany, J. (1989). Social control processes, activities and ideologies: The case of non-attendance in Melbourne. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 25(2), 222–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opotow, S. (1991). Adolescent peer conflicts: Implications for students and for schools. Education and Urban Society, 23(4), 416–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opotow, S. (1994). “Breaking Out”: Cutting in an Inner-City High School. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Opotow, S. (1995). The “cutting” epidemic: How high school teachers respond and adapt. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Opotow, S., Fortune, L., Baxter, M., & Sanon, F. (1998, June). Conflict, coping, and class cutting: Perspectives of urban high school students. Presented at the biannual meeting of the Society for the Psycho-logical Study of Social Issues, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Rouhana, N., & Korper, S. (1996). Dealing with the dilemmas posed by power asymmetry in intergroup conflict. Negotiation Journal, 12(4), 353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouhana, N., & Korper, S. (1996). Dealing with the dilemmas posed by power asymmetry in intergroup conflict. Negotiation Journal, 12(4), 353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, J.Z.,& Brown, B.R (1975). The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, J.Z., & Levinger, G. (1995). Levels of analysis: In search of generalizable knowledge. In Bunker, B. B. & Rubin, J.Z. (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation, and justice (pp. 13–38). San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
Sanon, F., Baxter, M., Fortune, L., & Opotow, S. (in press). Class cutting: Perspectives of urban high school students. In Shultz, J. & Cook-Sather, A. (Eds.), Student voices: Middle and high school students' perspectives on school and schooling. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Sefa Dei, G. J., Mazzuca, J., Mclsaac, E., Ogbu, J. U. (1997). Reconstructing ‘dropout’: A critical ethnography of the dynamics of black students' disengagement from school. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Susskind, L., & Field, P. (1996). Dealing with an angry public: Mutual gains approach to resolving disputes. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Wyatt, G. (1993). Skipping class: An analysis of absenteeism among first year college students. Teaching Sociology, 20(3), 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar