Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T08:13:41.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Black Minority Participation in the USA and Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Brian Jacobs
Affiliation:
Department of International Relations and PoliticsNorth Staffordshire Polytechnic

Abstract

Little attention has been paid to the comparative study of the politics and administration of race in the USA and Britain. There exist certain important similarities between the two countries particularly with regard to the way in which even militant leaders are willing to co-operate with centrally funded community agencies and to moderate their demands to gain political and economic returns for their organisations from government. There are, however, structural differences between American and British community bodies which affect the success of those institutions in obtaining the allegiance of community militants and in more fully integrating moderate leaderships into local level participatory processes. In the USA the system encourages an apparently high degree of ‘voluntarism’ and ‘independence’ from direct central control through relative institutional autonomy. This is more conducive to group co-operation than Britain's more centralised community relations framework with its closer direct association with government and the so-called ‘white power structure’. Because, therefore, of the American version of ‘independence’ groups there are actually more effectively integrated than the British into governmentally funded institutions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Action for Boston Community Development Inc. (1980) Annual Report 1980. Boston, Mass,Google Scholar
Bojean, C. M. and Olson, D. M. (1970) Community leadership: directions for research. In Aiken, M. and Mott, P. E. (eds.), The Structure of Community Power, New York: Random House, 203–15.Google Scholar
Boutelle, P. et al. (1969) The Black Uprisings: Newark, Detroit. New York: Merit.Google Scholar
Campaign Against Racism and Fascism and Southall Rights (1981) Southall: The Birth of a Community. London: Institute of Race Relations and Southall Rights.Google Scholar
Community Development Finance Corporation (1979) Annual Report 1979. Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
Community Relations Commission (CRC) (1976) Urban Deprivation, Racial Equality and Social Policy: A Report, London: Community Relations Commission.Google Scholar
Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) (1980) Annual Report 1980. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Community Services Administration (1980), Geographic Distribution of Federal Funds, Fiscal Tear 1980, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Dentier, R. A. and Scott, M. B. (1981) Schools on Trial: An Inside Account of the Boston Desegregation Case. Cambridge, Mass.: Abt Books.Google Scholar
Dettmar, R. P. (1981) Grants management by state and local governments: a systematic approach, GAO Review, Spring 1981. Washington: General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
Diamond, R. A. (ed), (1978) Urban America: Policies and Problems. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. and Batley, R. (1978) The Politics of Positive Discrimination. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Fischer, S. (1970) Power and the Black Community: A Reader on Racial Subordinaiton in the United States. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
The Ford Foundation (1980) The Local Initiatives Support Corporation, May 1980 Background Paper.Google Scholar
Foot, P. (1969) The Rise of Enoch Powell. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
Piven, Fox F. and Cloward, R. A. (1972) Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Greenstone, J. D. and Peterson, P. E. (1973) Race and Authority in Urban Politics. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Hadden, J. K., Masotti, L. H. and Thiessen, V. (1970) The making of the Negro mayors 1967. In Fisher (1970).Google Scholar
Heclo, H. (1978) Issue networks and the executive establishment. In King (1978).Google Scholar
Hill, M. J. and Issacharoff, R. M. (1971) Community Action and Race Relations. London: Oxford University Press and Institute of Race Relations.Google Scholar
Hillson, J. (1977) The Battle of Boston. New York: Pathfinder Press.Google Scholar
HMSO (1981) The Brixton Disorders 10–12 April 1981: Report of An Inquiry by the Rt Hon. The Lord Scarman, OBE. Cmnd 8427. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Home Affairs Committee of the House of Commons (1981) Racial Disadvantage, 4 vols. Session 1980–1. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Humphry, D. and Ward, M. (1974) Passports and Politics. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
Independent Sector (1981) Annual Report 1981. Washington DC.Google Scholar
Jacobs, B. (1978) Public Policy and Local Interest Groups in Britain: Three Case Studies. PhD. University of Keele.Google Scholar
Jacobs, B. (1980) Wolverhampton Council for Community Relations: the pattern of participation, Policy and Politics, 8, 401–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janowitz, M. (1968) Social Control of Escalated Riots. Chicago: The University of Chicago Centre for Policy Study.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. G. (1981) Iron triangles, woolly corporatism and elastic nets: images of the policy process, Journal of Public Policy, 1, 95123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katznelson, I. (1973) Black Men, White Cities, Race, Politics and Migration in the United States, 1900–30, and Britain, 1948–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press and Institute for Race Relations.Google Scholar
Keesings Research Report (1970) Race Relations in the USA, 1954–1968. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
King, A. (ed.) (1978) The New American Political System. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Kushnick, L. (1981) Parameters of British and North American racism, Race and Class, 23, Autumn/Winter (special issue ‘Britain '81, Rebellion and Repression’), 187206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, D. (1974) Black Migrants: White Natives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People (1976), Citizen Participation: The Community Development Block Grant Programme, (Housing Department Technical Bulletin).Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. J. (1975) Neighborhood Organisation and Interest Group Processes. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Olsen, J. P. (1976) Organisational Participation in Government. University of Bergen Paper.Google Scholar
Perkins, E. (1975) Home is a Dirty Street: The Social Oppression of Black Children. Chicago: Third World Press.Google Scholar
Rex, J. (1973) Race Colonialism and the City. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rex, J. and Tomlinson, S. (1979) Colonial Immigrants in a British City: A Class Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
The Runnymede Trust and the Radical Statistics Race Group (1980) Britains Black Population. London: Heinnemann.Google Scholar
Sears, D. C. and McConahay, J. B. (1973) The Politics of Violence: The New Urban Blacks and the Watts Riot. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Shapek, B. A. (1981) Managing Federalism, Evolution and Development of the Grant-in-Aid System. Charlottesville, Virginia: Community Collaborators.Google Scholar
United Community Planning Corporation (1980) Annual Report 1980. Boston, Mass.: United Community Planning Corporation.Google Scholar
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census (1980) Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1980.Google Scholar
Unofficial Committee of Enquiry (1980) Southall 23 April 1979. London: National Council of Civil Liberties (for Committee).Google Scholar
Van den Berghe, P. (1967) Race and Racism. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Vocations for Social Change (19801981) Boston People's Yellow Pages. Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
Wolverhampton Council for Community Relations (1981) 1980–81 Annual Report.Google Scholar