Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T08:57:15.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The diffusion of climate policies among German municipalities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2019

Dennis Abel Open the ORCID record for Dennis Abel [Opens in a new window]
Dennis Abel*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, Cologne Center for Comparative Politics, University of Cologne, Germany
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: abel@wiso.uni-koeln.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The German government established a funding scheme for local climate policy in 2008. The translation of this programme into climate action varies between municipalities. This article studies the drivers and barriers for the diffusion of the programme among German municipalities. A major aim is to disentangle the diffusion effects across different steps within the policy cycle by employing Event History Analysis and spatial panel autoregressive models. Geographical proximity, party channels and transnational city networks are predictors of the diffusion process. Differences in diffusion effects between policy adoption and substantial policy output indicate that emulation as well as learning influence policy activity. Furthermore, increasing deployment of solar photovoltaic systems in neighbouring municipalities is associated with an intensification of climate policy in the focal municipality. The absence of similar effects for other renewable energy technologies hints at the “conditional nature” of policy learning with respect to the policy-makers’ vote- and policy-seeking behaviour.

Keywords

climate policydiffusionenergy policylearninglocal politics
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 111 - 136
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

AEE – Agentur für Erneuerbare Energien (2015) Akzeptanz für Erneuerbare Energien weiterhin hoch, Renews Kompakt, 27 (https://www.unendlich-viel-energie.de/media/file/416.AEE_RenewsKompakt_Akzeptanzumfrage2015.pdf).Google Scholar
AEE – Agentur für Erneuerbare Energien (2016) Die Akzeptanz für Erneuerbare Energien im Spiegel von Umfragen in Industriestaaten. Renews Kompakt, 29 (https://www.unendlich-viel-energie.de/media/file/426.AEE_RK29_Internationale_Akzeptanzumfragen_Mrz16.pdf).Google Scholar
Baybeck, B, Berry, WD and Siegel, DA (2011) A Strategic Theory of Policy Diffusion via Intergovernmental Competition. The Journal of Politics, 73(1): 232–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, M, Bethke, FS and Lambach, D (2015) The Democratic Dividend of Nonviolent Resistance. Journal of Peace Research, 53(6): 758–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, FS and Berry, WD (1990) State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis. American Political Science Review, 84(2): 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, FS and Berry, WD (2007) Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research. In Sabatier, P. A. (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 223–260.Google Scholar
Berry, MJ, Laird, FN and Stefes, CH (2015) Driving Energy: The Enactment and Ambitiousness of State Renewable Energy Policy. Journal of Public Policy, 35(2): 297–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, WD and Baybeck, B(2005) Using Geographic Information Systems to Study Interstate Competition. American Political Science Review, 99(4): 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betsill, MM and Bulkeley, H (2006) Cities and the Multilevel Governance of Global Climate Change. Global Governance, 12(2): 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boschma, RA (2005) Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1): 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouteligier, S (2013) Cities, Networks, and Global Environmental Governance. New York, NY/London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, JM and Jones, BS (2004) Event History Modeling. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulkeley, H (2010) Cities and the Governing of Climate Change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35: 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulkeley, H and Kern, K (2006) Local Government and the Governing of Climate Change in Germany and the UK. Urban Studies, 43(12): 2237–2259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulkeley, H, Davies, A, Evans, B, Gibbs, D, Kern, K and Theobald, K (2003) Environmental Governance and Transnational Municipal Networks in Europe. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 5(3): 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, PO and Jörgens, H (2012a) Europeanization through Diffusion? Renewable Energy Policies and Alternative Sources for European Convergence. In Morata, F. and Sandoval, I. S. (eds.), European Energy Policy. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 66–84.Google Scholar
Busch, PO and Jörgens, H (2012b) Governance by Diffusion: Exploring a New Mechanism of International Policy Coordination. In Meadowcroft, J., Langhelle, O. and Ruud, A. (eds.), Governance, Democracy and Sustainable Development. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 221–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, PO, Jörgens, H and Tews, K (2005) The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Instruments: The Making of a New International Environmental Regime. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598: 146–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, DM, Volden, C, Dynes, AM and Shor, B (2017) Ideology, Learning, and Policy Diffusion: Experimental Evidence. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1): 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carley, S, Nicholson-Crotty, S and Miller, CJ (2017) Adoption, Reinvention and Amendment of Renewable Portfolio Standards in the American States. Journal of Public Policy, 37(4), 431–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elhorst, JP (2014) Spatial Econometrics. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, Z, Guzman, AT and Simmons, BA (2006) Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960–2000. International Organization, 60, 811–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, CS (1978) Urban-to-Rural Diffusion of Opinions in Contemporary America. American Journal of Sociology, 84(1): 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florida, R (2005) Cities and the Creative Class. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzese, RJ and Hays, JC (2007) Spatial Econometric Models of Cross-Sectional Interdependence in Political Science Panel and Time-Series-Cross-Section Data. Political Analysis, 15(2): 140–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzese, RJ and Hays, JC (2008) Interdependence in Comparative Politics. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4/5): 742–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandrud, C (2015) simPH: An R Package for Illustrating Estimates from Cox Proportional Hazard Models Including for Interactive and Nonlinear Effects. Journal of Statistical Software, 65(3): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerlach, JD, Williams, LK and Forcina, CE (2013) The Science-Natural Resource Policy Relationship: How Aspects of Diffusion Theory Explain Data Selection for Making Biodiversity Management Decisions. Politics & Policy, 41(3): 326–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, F (2010) Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes? American Journal of Political Science, 54(3): 650–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, F (2016) Four Ways We Can Improve Policy Diffusion Research. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 16(1): 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, F and Füglister, K (2008) Empirical Modeling of Policy Diffusion in Federal States: The Dyadic Approach. Swiss Political Science Review, 14(3): 413–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, E (2011) Triumph of the City. London, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Glick, DM and Friedland, Z (2014) How Often Do States Study Each Other? Evidence of Policy Knowledge Diffusion. American Politics Research, 42(6): 956–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, HR and Hays, SP (1991) Innovation and Reinvention in State Policymaking: Theory and the Evolution of Living Will Laws. Journal of Politics, 53(3): 835–850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossback, LJ, Nicholson-Crotty, S and Peterson, DAM (2004) Ideology and Learning in Policy Diffusion. American Politics Research, 32(5): 521–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, J (2007) The Multi-Level Governance Challenge of Climate Change. Environmental Sciences, 4(3): 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakelberg, L (2014) Governance by Diffusion: Transnational Municipal Networks and the Spread of Local Climate Strategies in Europe. Global Environmental Politics, 14(1): 107–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzinger, K, Knill, C and Sommerer, T (2008) Environmental Policy Convergence: The Impact of International Harmonization, Transnational Communication, and Regulatory Competition. International Organization, 62(4): 553–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jänicke, M (2005) Trend-Setters in Environmental Policy: The Character and Role of Pioneer Countries. European Environment, 15(2): 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, NM and Lindstädt, R (2012) Leaning Right and Learning from the Left: Diffusion of Corporate Tax Policy across Borders. Comparative Political Studies, 45(3): 283–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karch, A, Nicholson-Crotty, SA, Woods, ND and Bowman, A (2016) Policy Diffusion and Pro-innovation Bias. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1): 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, K (2014) Climate Governance in the European Union Multilevel System: The Role of Cities. In Weibust, I. and Meadowcroft, J. (eds.), Multilevel Environmental Governance. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 111–130.Google Scholar
Kern, K and Alber, G (2008) Chapter 8: Governing Climate Change in Cities: Modes of Urban Climate Governance in Multi-Level Systems. In Competitive Cities and Climate Change. OECD Conference Proceedings. Milan: OECD, 171–196.Google Scholar
Kern, K and Bulkeley, H (2009) Cities, Europeanization and Multi-Level Governance: Governing Climate Change through Transnational Municipal Networks. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2): 309–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knill, C (2005) Introduction: Cross-National Policy Convergence: Concepts, Approaches and Explanatory Factors. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5): 764–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knill, C, Heichel, S and Arndt, D (2012) Really a Front-Runner, Really a Straggler? Or Environmental Leaders and Laggards in the European Union and Beyond – A Quantitative Policy Perspective. Energy Policy, 48: 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knill, C, Schulze, K and Tosun, J (2010) Politikwandel und Seine Messung in der Vergleichenden Staatstätigkeitsforschung: Konzeptionelle Probleme und Mögliche Alternativen. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 51(3): 409–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, L and Yu, J (2010a) Estimation of Spatial Autoregressive Panel Data Models with Fixed Effects. Journal of Econometrics, 154: 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, L and Yu, J (2010b) Some Recent Developments in Spatial Panel Data Models. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40: 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenhart, J, Bouteligier, S, Mol, APJ and Kern, K (2014) Cities as Learning Organisations in Climate Policy: The Case of Malmö. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 6(1): 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenschow, A, Liefferink, D and Veenman, S (2005) When the Birds Sing. A Framework for Analysing Domestic Factors behind Policy Convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5): 797–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi-Faur, D (2005) The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598: 12–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Licht, A (2011) Change Comes with Time: Substantive Interpretation of Nonproportional Hazards in Event History Analysis. Political Analysis, 19(2): 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liefferink, D and Andersen, MS (1998) Strategies of the “Green” Member States in EU Environmental Policy-Making. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(2): 254–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liefferink, D, Arts, B, Kamstra, J and Ooijevaar, J (2009) Leaders and Laggards in Environmental Policy: A Quantitative Analysis of Domestic Policy Outputs. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(5): 677–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maggetti, M and Gilardi, F (2016) Problems (and Solutions) in the Measurement of Policy Diffusion Mechanisms. Journal of Public Policy, 36(1): 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makse, T and Volden, C (2011) The Role of Policy Attributes in the Diffusion of Innovations. The Journal of Politics, 73(1): 108–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meseguer, C (2004) What Role for Learning? The Diffusion of Privatisation in OECD and Latin American Countries. Journal of Public Policy, 24(3): 299–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mössner, S (2016) Sustainable Urban Development as Consensual Practice: Post-Politics in Freiburg, Germany. Regional Studies, 50(6): 971–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlhorst, D, Tews, K and Schreurs, M (2013) Energiewende als Herausforderung der Koordination im Mehrebenensystem. Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis, 22(2): 48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plümper, T and Neumayer, E (2010) Model Specification in the Analysis of Spatial Dependence. European Journal of Political Research, 49: 418–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiche, D and Beschberger, M (2006) Diffusion von Einspeisevergütungsmodellen in der EU-25 als instrumenteller Beitrag zur Verbreitung erneuerbarer Energien. In Reiche, D. and Beschberger, M. (eds.), Ökologische Transformation der Energiewirtschaft. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag, 199–218.Google Scholar
Rogers, EM (2003) Diffusion of Innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Schaffrin, A, Sewerin, S and Seubert, S (2014) The Innovativeness of National Policy Portfolios – Climate Policy Change in Austria, Germany, and the UK. Environmental Politics, 23(5): 860–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, M (1996) When Parties Matter: A Review of the Possibilities and Limits of Partisan Influence on Public Policy. European Journal of Political Research, 30(3): 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreurs, M (2008) From the Bottom Up: Local and Subnational Climate Change Politics. The Journal of Environment & Development, 17(4): 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, CR and Volden, C (2008) The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion. American Political Science Review, 52(4): 840–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, CR and Volden, C (2012) Policy Diffusion. Seven Lessons for Scholars and Practitioners. Public Administration Review, 72(6): 788–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
StataCorp (2017a) STATA Survival Analysis Reference Manual. Release 15. Statistical Software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.Google Scholar
StataCorp (2017b) STATA Spatial Autoregressive Models Reference Manual. Release 15. Statistical Software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.Google Scholar
Todd, D (1979) On Urban Spill-Overs and Rural Transformation: A Canadian Example. Regional Studies, 13(3): 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, J and Mintrom, M (2001) Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming. International Studies Quarterly, 45(1): 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A and Kahneman, A (1974) Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157): 1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, JL (1969) The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States. The American Political Science Review, 63(3): 880–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, H and John, P (2013) Competitive Learning in Yardstick Competition: Testing Models of Policy Diffusion with Performance Data. Political Science Research and Methods, 1(1): 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, K (2005) Theories of Policy Diffusion. Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform. World Politics, 57(2): 262–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, K (2006) Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion. Social Sector Reform in Latin America. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Abel supplementary material

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FW5LNF
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Abel supplementary material

Appendix

Download Abel supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 956.2 KB