Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T16:10:04.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nationalization and Privatization: A Rational-Choice Perspective on Efficiency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Ellen M. Pint
Ellen M. Pint
Affiliation:
Economics, Nuffield College, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper analyzes the use of nationalization and privatization policies to redistribute costs and benefits among interest groups, using a rational-choice framework. The major cases considered are the post-war nationalizations and the current wave of privatizations in the United Kingdom, plus France and the United States. The analysis indicates that governments tend to redistribute benefits to more concentrated interest groups, such as organized labor or shareholders, and to impose costs on more diffuse groups, such as consumers and taxpayers. This type of redistribution is often economically inefficient, but politically efficient for the party in power. Policy design is also influenced by the ease with which policies can be changed by future governments within the prevailing political institutions.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , July 1990 , pp. 267 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Becker, Gary S. (1983) ‘A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 3, 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beesley, Michael and Littlechild, Stephen (1966) ‘Privatisation: Principles, Problems and Priorities,’ in John Kay, Colin Mayer and David Thompson, Privatisation and Regulation: The United Kingdom Experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bendor, Jonathan and Mookherjee, Dilip (1987) ‘Institutional Structure and the Logic of Ongoing Collective Action,’ American Political Science Review, 81, 1, 129–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chester, Sir Norman (1975). The Nationalisation of British Industry 1945–51. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Almanac (1970-1986) Vol. 26–42. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.Google Scholar
Curwen, Peter (1986) Public Enterprise: A Modern Approach. London: Wheatsheaf Books.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Finer, S. E. (1957) Five Constitutions. Sussex: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Hannah, Leslie (1979) Electricity before Nationalisation. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Jacquillet, Bernard (1988) ‘Nationalization and Privatization in Contemporary France,’ Stanford, California: Hoover Institution Essays in Public Policy 10.Google Scholar
Kay, John, Mayer, Colin and Thompson, David (1986) Privatisation and Regulation: The United Kingdom Experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Keisling, Phil (1982) ‘The Great Train Robbery: How to Make a Billion from a Bankrupt Railroad,’ Washington Monthly, 14, 5–6, 24–35.Google Scholar
Keif-Cohen, Reuben (1973) British Nationalisation 1945–1973. New York: St Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Colin and Meadowcroft, Shirley (1986) ‘Selling Public Assets: Techniques and Financial Implications,,’ in John Kay, Colin Mayer and David Thompson Privatisation and Regulation: The United Kingdom Experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Musolf, Lloyd (1983) ‘Conrail: Poverty Revisited and Rebuffed,’ in Uncle Sam's Private, Profitseeking Corporations. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur (1971) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, George (1975) The Citizen and the State. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, George (1974) ‘Free Riders and Collective Action: An Appendix to Theories of Regulation,’ Belt Journal of Economics, 5, 2, 359–365.Google Scholar
Thomas, David (1986) ‘The Union Response to Denationalisation,’ in Kay, John, Mayer, Colin and Thompson, David, Privatisation and Regulation: The United Kingdom Experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Vickers, John and Yarrow, George (1985) Privatization and the Natural Monopolies. London: Public Policy Centre.Google Scholar
Vickers, John and Yarrow, George (1988) Privatization: An Economic Analysis. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Vincent (1983) The Government and Policies of France. London: Hutchinson & Co.Google Scholar