Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T08:11:51.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paths and Forks or Chutes and Ladders?: Negative Feedbacks and Policy Regime Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2010

KENT WEAVER
KENT WEAVER
Affiliation:
Georgetown Public Policy Institute, 3520 Prospect Street NW,Suite 400Washington DC 20007 e-mail: weaverrk@georgetown.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The literature on path dependence has emphasized positive feedback effects that make it difficult to shift from a policy regime once it is in place. This article argues that policy regimes may also have strong negative feedback effects that undermine the political, fiscal or social sustainability of an existing policy regime. The prospects for a shift in policy regime depend largely on the balance between positive and negative feedback effects; the availability of incremental reform options that can be used to patch the status quo; and the availability of politically and fiscally attractive regime transition options. The paper argues that differential survival rates of different public pension regimes in western industrial countries can be understood by the interaction of these three factors.

Keywords

path dependencynegative feedbackpensionspolicy regimes
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , August 2010 , pp. 137 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, K. M. and Immergut, E. M. (2007) “Sweden: After Social Democratic Hegemony,” pp. 349–395 in Immergut, E. M., Anderson, K. M. and Schulze, I.The Handbook of West European Pension Politics, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 349–395.Google Scholar
Andresen, M. (2006) “Pension Reform in Norway and Sweden,” Nordisk Försäkringstidskrift, 2006/4, pp. 303–311.Google Scholar
Banting, K. G. (1987) The Welfare State and Canadian Federalism. 2nd Edition (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, F. and Jones, B.Policy Dynamics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Béland, D. and Myles, J. (2005) “Stasis Amidst Change: Canadian Pension Reform in an Age of Retrenchment.” in Bonoli, G. and Shinkawa, T. (eds.) Ageing and Pension Reform Around the World, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 252–272.Google Scholar
Béland, D. and Shinkawa, T. (2007) “Public and Private Policy Change: Pension Reform in Four Countries.” Policy Studies Journal, 35, 3, 349–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Board of Trustees, Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance Trust Funds (2009) The 2009 Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Old Age and Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance Trust Funds, House Document 111–41, May 12.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2000) The Politics of Pension Reform: Institutions and Policy Change in Western Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G. and Palier, B. (2007) “When Past Reforms Open New Opportunities: Comparing Old-age Insurance Reforms in Bismarckian Welfare Systems,” Social Policy and Administration, 41, 6, 555–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G. and Shinkawa, T. (2005) “Population Ageing and the Logics of Pension Reform in Western Europe, East Asia and North America.” In Bonoli, G. and Shinkawa, T. (eds.) Ageing and Pension Reform Around the World, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, S. M. and Weaver, R. Kent (2006) “Lashed to the Mast?: The Politics of NDC Pension Reform,” pp. 345–385 In Holzmann, R. and Palmer, E. (eds.) Pension Reform: Issues and Prospects for Non-Defined Contribution Pension Schemes, Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Council of the European Union (2001) “Joint report of the Social Protection Committee and the Economic Policy Committee on objectives and working methods in the area of pensions: applying the open method of coordination,” 14098/01, November 23.Google Scholar
Edwards, G. C. III (2007) Governing by Campaigning: The Politics of the Bush Presidency [second edition], New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1990) Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1999) “Politics Without Class? Postindustrial Cleavages in Europe and America,” In Kitschelt, H. et al. (eds.) Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, M. and Jessoula, M. (2005) Reconfiguring Italian Pensions: from Policy Stalemate to Comprehensive Reforms. In Bonoli, G. and Shinkawa, T. (eds.) Ageing and Pension Reform Around the World, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 22–46.Google Scholar
Franco, D. (2003) “Italy: The Search for a Sustainable PAYG Pension System,” In Takayama, N. (ed.) Searching for Better Pension Provisions in Developed Countries, Tokyo: Maruzen.Google Scholar
Government of Australia (2004) A More Flexible and Adaptable Retirement Income System, Canberra, Department of Communications.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C. and Lindbom, A. (2006) “Politics Within Paths: Trajectories of Danish and Swedish Earnings-Related Pensions,” Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 3, 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hering, M. (2008) “Welfare State Restructuring without Grand Coalitions: The Role of Informal Cooperation in Blame Avoidance,” German Politics, 17, 2, pp. 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinrichs, K. (2000) “Elephants on the Move. Patterns of Public Pension Reform in OECD Countries” European Review, 8, 3, pp. 353–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinrichs, K. (2005) “New Century – New Paradigm: Pension Reforms in Germany.” In Bonoli, G. and Shinkawa, T. (eds.) Ageing and Pension Reform Around the World, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 47–63.Google Scholar
Holzmann, R. and Palmer, E. (2006) Pension Reform: Issues and Prospects for Non-Financial Defined Contribution (NDC) Schemes, Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immergut, E. M. and Anderson, K. M. (2007) “Editor's Introduction: The Dynamics of Pension Politics,” pp. 1–45 In Immergut, E. M., Anderson, K. M. and Schulze, I.The Handbook of West European Pension Politics, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M. (2008) The Politics of When: Redistribution, Investment and Policy Making for the Long Term. British Journal of Political Science, 38, pp 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, E., Smalhout, J. and Vittas, D. (2001) “Administrative Costs and the Organization of Individual Account Systems: A Comparative Perspective,” pp. 254–307 In Holzmann, R. and Stiglitz, J. (eds.) New Ideas About Old Age Security, Washington, D.C: World Bank.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (2001) “Partisan Competition and Welfare State Retrenchment: When Do Politicians Choose Unpopular Policies?,” pp. 265–302 In Pierson, (ed.) The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritzer, B. (2007) “Kiwisaver: New Zealand's New Subsidized Retirement Savings Plans. Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 67, No. 4, 113–119.Google ScholarPubMed
Light, P. (1995) Still Artful Work: The Continuing Politics of Social Security Reform [second edition], New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Little, B.Fixing the Future: How Canada's Usually Fractious Governments Worked Together to Rescue the Canada Pension Plan, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, U. (2003) Juvelen i kronan. Socialdemokraterna och den allmänna pensionen Stockholm: Hjalmarson and Högberg, 2003.Google Scholar
Myles, J. and Pierson, P. (2001) “The Comparative Political Economy of Pension Reform,” pp. 305–333 In Pierson, ed., The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overbye, E. (2007) “How Do Politicians Get Away With Path-Breaking Reforms: The Political Psychology of Pension Reform in Democracies. In Arza, C. and Kohli, M. (eds.) Politics, Policies and Outcomes, London: Routledge, pp. 70–86.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1993) “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics, 45, pp. 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (1994) Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (1996) “The New Politics of the Welfare State,” World Politics 48 (1): 143–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000) “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics,” The American Political Science Review, 94, 2 (June), pp. 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2001) “Post-Industrial Pressures on the Mature Welfare States,” pp. 80–104 In Pierson, (ed.) The New Politics of the Welfare State, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2004) Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Régie des Rentes du Québec (2008) Toward a Stronger and Fairer Québec Pension Plan, Quebec: Régie des Rentes du Québec.Google Scholar
Rose, R. (1993) Lesson-Drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space. Chatham NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Schulze, I. and Moran, M. (2006) “United Kingdom: Pension Politics in an Adversarial System,” pp. 49–96 In Immergut, E. M., Anderson, K. M. and Schulze, I.The Handbook of West European Pension Politics, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Settergren, O. (2003) “The Reform of the Swedish Pension System – Initial Results,” Revue Française des Affaires Sociales, 2003, 4 (Octobre–December), pp. 369–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2005) “UK Pension Reform: A Test Case for a Liberal Welfare State?” In Bonoli, G. and Shinkawa, T. (eds.) Ageing and Pension Reform Around the World, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 116–135.Google Scholar
United Kingdom, Pension Commission [Turner Commission] Pensions: Challenges and Choices, Norwich: HMSO, 2004.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent (1998) “The Politics of Pension Reform: Lessons from Abroad,” In Arnold, R. Douglas, Graetz, M., and Munnell, A. (eds.) Framing the Social Security Debate: Values, Politics and Economics, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 183–229.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent (2000) Ending Welfare As We Know It, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution PressGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent (2005a) “Public Pension Policy in the United States,” In Bonoli, G. and Shinkawa, T. pp. 230–251 In Ageing and Pension Reform Around the World: Evidence from Eleven Countries, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent (2006) “Government Institutions, Policy Cartels and Policy Change,” pp. 216–237 In Schapiro, I. and Skowronek, S. (eds.) Rethinking Political Institutions: the Art of the State, New York: New York University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. B. (2004) “Assessing the Pension Reform Potential of a Notional Defined Contribution Pillar.” International Social Security Review, 57, 1, 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar