No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Ultrahypofractionated breast radiotherapy during SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic, beyond fast-forward trial: a local experience
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2022
Abstract
Background:
During the SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust Oncology Department incorporated the ultrahypofractionated regime of 26Gy/5 fractions alongside the moderate hypofractionated regime of 40Gy/15 fractions as part of local adjuvant breast radiotherapy treatment (RT) for eligible patients. We conducted a local study to assess the real-life experience of patients undergoing ultrahypofractionated schedule to compare feasibility and toxicity to the fast-forward trial during the COVID − 19 pandemic.
Methods:
A single institution, retrospective, qualitative study. Patients included had early-stage breast cancer and received adjuvant radiotherapy between 23 March 2020 and 31 May 2020, a total of 211 patients. Inclusion was irrespective of any other neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatments. Data were collected retrospectively for treatment dose, boost dose and toxicity.
Results:
Of the total 211 patients, 85 were treated with 26Gy in 5# and 19 patients received a boost as per the fast-forward protocol. Of these 85 patients, 15·9% did not report any skin toxicity post-treatment. 63·5% of patients reported RTOG Grade 1, 15·9% had RTOG Grade 2, and 1·6% reported RTOG Grade 3 skin toxicity. 3·2% of the patients could not be contacted for follow-up. Of the 19 patients who received a breast boost, 10·53% reported no skin changes. 78·9% reported Grade 1 skin toxicity. Both Grades 2a and 2b skin toxicity were reported by 5·26% each. The patient demographics and tumour characteristics in our study cohort were comparable to those within the fast-forward trial. In terms of post-RT skin toxicity, fewer patients reported any toxicity in the UHB patient cohort versus those in the trial, and the number of Grade 2/3 toxicities reported was also low. A delay in toxicity reporting from 2 weeks for 40Gy/15 to 3 weeks for 26Gy/5 was observed.
Conclusion:
Our study concluded that offering ultrahypofractionation was convenient for patients; reducing the number of hospital visits during the SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic appeared safe in terms of acute post-RT-related skin toxicity. The reduced hospital visits limited exposure of patients and staff to the SARS-CoV-2 virus while also ensuring efficient use of Radiotherapy Department resources. Local follow-up protocols have been amended to ensure review at 3 weeks for the 26Gy/5 schedule to acknowledge the delay in acute toxicity development. To date, there is only 5-year toxicity and relapse data available from the fast-forward trial; therefore, hypofractionation schedules should be offered to patients as long as they fulfil the criteria and understand the limitations of the study as well as accelerated peer review processes in the face of the pandemic.
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Coles, CE, Aristei, C, Bliss, J et al. International guidelines on radiation therapy for breast cancer during the SARS-COV 2 VIRUS pandemic. Clin Oncol 2020; 32 (5): 279–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manoj Gowda, S, Kabeer, KK, Jafferbhoy, S et al. Breast cancer management guidelines during SARS-COV 2 VIRUS pandemic. Indian J Surg 2020; 82, 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismaili, N, El Majjaoui, S. Management of breast cancer during SARS-COV 2 VIRUS pandemic in Morocco. Breast J 2020; 26 (8): 1618–1619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, JJ, Sim, Y, Ow, SGW et al. The impact of SARS-COV 2 VIRUS on and recommendations for breast cancer care: the Singapore experience. Endocr Relat Cancer 2020; 27 (9): R307–R327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brunt, AM, Haviland, JS, Wheatley, DA et al. Hypofractionated breast radiotherapy for 1 week versus 3 weeks (FAST-Forward): 5-year efficacy and late normal tissue effects results from a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2020; 395 (10237): 1613–1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Royal College of Radiologists. Radiation fractionation schedules published during the SARS-COV 2 VIRUS pandemic: a systematic review of the quality of evidence and recommendations for future development – ScienceDirect. https://www.rcr.ac.uk/system/files/publication/field_publication_files/brfo193_radiotherapy_dose_fractionation_third-edition.pdf. Accessed on 3rd May 2021.Google Scholar
Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), Darby, S, McGale, P et al. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet 2011; 378 (9804): 1707–1716.Google ScholarPubMed
EBCTCG (Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group), McGale, P, Taylor, C et al. Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomised trials. Lancet 2014; 383 (9935): 2127–2135.Google ScholarPubMed
Fisher, B, Anderson, S, Bryant, J et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347 (16): 1233–1241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
START Trialists’ Group, Bentzen, SM, Agrawal, RK et al. The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial B of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2008; 371 (9618): 1098–1107.Google ScholarPubMed
FAST Trialists Group, Agrawal, RK, Alhasso, A et al. First results of the randomised UK FAST Trial of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer (CRUKE/04/015). Radiother Oncol 2011; 100 (1): 93–100.Google Scholar
Gasparri, ML, Gentilini, OD, Lueftner, D et al. Changes in breast cancer management during the Corona Virus Disease 19 pandemic: an international survey of the European Breast Cancer Research Association of Surgical Trialists (EUBREAST). Breast 2020; 52: 110–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, DJ, Yom, SS, Saeed, H et al. Radiation fractionation schedules published during the SARS-COV 2 VIRUS pandemic: a systematic review of the quality of evidence and recommendations for future development. IJROBP 2020; 108 (2): 379–389.Google Scholar