Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T08:34:43.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Caesar at the Lupercalia*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2010

J. A. North
Affiliation:
University College Londonucrajan@ucl.ac.uk

Extract

This article examines the context in which Caesar, enthroned in state, attended the Festival of the Lupercalia of 44 B.C. at which he was offered and rejected a diadem; it asks the question what the ritual had to offer to Caesar. An examination of the Festival's character and tradition suggests (a) that it took the form of a street carnival, (b) that it was concerned simultaneously with the purification, fertility and protection of the people of Rome, and (c) that it had no element of a coronation in its rituals. The suggestion is offered that Caesar's prime motivation was to associate himself with the founders of the city, since he and his family were receiving the honour of a new group of Luperci, set up to parallel those of Romulus and Remus. If Antony's offering of the diadem was pre-arranged, the light-hearted and provocative atmosphere of the occasion strongly suggests that the plan must always have been that Caesar should publicly reject the offer, as he did. But the whole incident illustrates the vigour and creativity of religious life at the time.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © J. A. North 2008. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Earlier versions of this paper were read in Tel Aviv, at the celebration of Zwi Yavetz' 80th birthday; in Tokyo University, to the Research Progamme on Death and Life Studies; and to a seminar in Durham University. I am most grateful for the discussions (very different ones) on all three occasions and also to Neil McLynn for much illuminating debate.