Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T00:32:10.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Constitutio Antoniniana and the Egyptian Poll-Tax1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2012

Extract

The poll-tax (λαογραφία as it was called in Greek), was one of the most important of the many taxes levied by the Romans on their Egyptian subjects. In his work on Taxation in Egypt, Mr. S. L. Wallace states: ‘There are more receipts for payment of λαογραφία extant than for any other tax paid in money.’ The view prevailing among papyrologists during the earlier years of the present century was that it was an impost which marked the inferior status of the Egyptians. They were dediticii, subdued by force of arms, and moreover excluded from the possibility of obtaining the Roman citizenship except in so far as they could succeed in first procuring admission to the citizen body of Alexandria. Thus, in his Grundzüge, published in 1912, Wilcken writes: ‘[Die Ägypter] wurden wieder zurückgeworfen in die niedrige Stellung, die sie unter den ersten Ptolemäern eingenommen hatten. Zwar hatten sie auch damals schon eine kopfsteuerartige Auflage zahlen müssen, aber abgesehen davon, dass die von Augustus eingeführte Kopfsteuer (λαογραφία) neu und wahrscheinlich strenger organisiert wurde, waren die Ägypter jetzt als peregrini dediticii als die Pariaklasse gebrandmarkt.’ When, therefore, P Giss. 40 restored to us, though in an unfortunately fragmentary form, the actual text of the Constitutio Antoniniana, and one clause of this famous edict was construed by the editor as excluding the dediticii from Caracalla's gift of the Roman citizenship, it was naturally concluded, alike by the editor and by all other scholars, that the Egyptians as a mass did not receive the citizenship but continued as (to use Wilcken's expression) a pariah class.

Type
Papers Presented to N. H. Baynes
Copyright
Copyright © H. I. Bell 1947. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This article is founded on a paper read at an international conference on the study of ancient law which was held at Brussels in December, 1945. I have recast and in part rewritten it in the light of criticisms made on it then and by my friend, Mr. C. H. Roberts, and as the result of further consideration and research. It is now offered as a token of friendship and sincere admiration to the acknowledged master of Byzantine studies in this country: Ἐρρῶσθαί σε εὔχομαι, φίλτατε, π̣ολλοῖς χρόνοις.

References

2 P. 116.

3 P. 58.

4 P. 116.

5 See, e.g., PSI VIII, 902, 7; P Mich. V. index VIII.

6 Pp. 107–9.

7 Das Edikt des Kaisers Caracalla in P. Giss. 40.

8 Theban Ostraca, 86 (‘probably 213 A.D.’ ed.).

9 καθαρὸν ἀπὸ παντὸς ὀφιλήματ ος, ἀπὸ μὲν λαογραφιῶν τῶν ἐν αὐτῇ…

10 P Oxy. VIII, 1157:καὶ μάθε ὅτι τὸ ἐπικεφάλαιον ἀπαιτοῦσιν.

11 PSI III, 164.

12 See my article, The Economic Crisis in Egypt under Nero’, JRS XXVIII, 1938, 18Google Scholar.

13 Segrè states (Byzantion XVI, 1941, 416Google Scholar, n. 33) that at the beginning of the third century prices were ‘at a level twice as high as in the first and second’.

14 There is in the British Muséum a series of unpublished receipts and taxing-lists which shows how heavy a burden on the wealthier landowners he aurum coronarium had become before the end of the second century.

15 P Fay. 20.

16 e.g. P Oxy. III, 478, 22 f., δι΄ ὁμολόγου λαογραφίας (epicrisis return, A.D. 132); W. Chrest. 102, ἀπολυσίμων τῆς λαογ̣ρ̣αφίας (A.D. 193); BGU 1, 350, 9, βεβαιώσι…, ἀπὸ μὲν λαογραφιῶν πασῶν (post A.D. 102; cf. BGU 667 of c. A.D. 221–2, cited above, n. 9).

17 Wilcken is surely right in taking ώς ἔτνΧεν with γίγνεσθαι: ‘wie es traf, aufs Geratewohl.’