Last updated 10th July 2024: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 September 2012
When in the spring of 1929 the Norfolk and Norwich Archaeological Society was about to begin excavations on the site of Venta Icenorum (Caistor-next-Norwich) Sir George Macdonald prophesied, in an article in The Observer, that among the results of the work would be a useful increase in our knowledge of the Roman pottery of the East Anglian area. It is not inappropriate, therefore, that an account of three pottery kilns found at Caistor in 1930 and of the pottery associated with them should be included in a publication dedicated to Sir George.
page 33 note 1 An interim report is published in Original Papers of the Norfolk and Norwich Arch. Soc., xxiv (1931), 93–139.
page 34 note 1 Y Cymmrodor, vol. xli, p. 53 f.
page 36 note 1 Camb. Ant. Soc. Comm., vol xviii, p. 60, fig. 53, cf. Grimes op. cit., p. 64, no. 7.
page 39 note 1 I am also indebted to Mr. Stafford for all the drawings which accompany this account. I take the opportunity here of recording the service which he has rendered to students of Romano-British pottery by his admirable accomplishment of a long and tedious undertaking.
page 40 note 1 The first dimension gives the height, the second the greatest width of the vessel.
page 40 note 2 May, op. cit. pl. lv, 238, 239.
page 42 note 1 Bushe-Fox, , Excavation of the Late-Celtic Urnfield at Swarling, Kent (1925), p. 30 f.Google Scholar; Hawkes, and Dunning, ‘The Belgae of Gaul and Britain’, Arch. Journ. vol. LXXXVII (1930), p. 151 f.Google Scholar
page 42 note 2 Bushe-Fox, op. cit. pl. ix.
page 42 note 3 May, Colchester, pl. lxxvi, 49.
page 42 note 4 cf. Fox, , Archaeology of the Cambridge Region, p. 102Google Scholar.
page 43 note 1 Bushe-Fox, op. cit., pl. vi, 1, and probably pl. ix, 32.
page 43 note 2 Camb. Ant. Soc. Comm., vol. xviii, p. 58, fig. 49.
