Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T09:21:07.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can ‘New Welfare’ Address Poverty through More and Better Jobs?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2014

PETER TAYLOR-GOOBY ,
JULIA M. GUMY  and
ADELINE OTTO
PETER TAYLOR-GOOBY
Affiliation:
SSPSSR, University of Kent, CT2 7NF email: p.f.taylor-gooby@kent.ac.uk
JULIA M. GUMY
Affiliation:
School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TZ email: J.Gumy@kent.ac.uk
ADELINE OTTO
Affiliation:
SSPSSR, University of Kent, CT2 7NF email: A.Otto@kent.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

New welfare has been prominent in recent European social policy debates. It involves mobilising more people into paid work, improving human capital and ensuring fairer access to opportunities. This programme is attractive to business (more workers, better human capital and reduced social conflict to enhance productivity and profitability) and to citizens (more widely accessible job-opportunities with better rewards): a relatively low-cost approach to the difficulties governments face in maintaining support and meeting social goals as inequalities widen.

The general move towards ‘new welfare’ gathered momentum during the past two decades, given extra impetus by the 2007–09 recession and subsequent stagnation. While employment rates rose during the prosperous years before the crisis, there was no commensurate reduction in poverty. Over the same period the share of economic growth returned to labour fell, labour markets were increasingly de-regulated and inequality increased. This raises the question of whether new welfare's economic goals (higher employment, improved human capital) and social goals (better job quality and incomes) may come into conflict.

This paper examines data for seventeen European countries over the period 2001 to 2007. It shows that new welfare is much more successful at achieving higher employment than at reducing poverty, even during prosperity, and that the approach pays insufficient attention to structural factors, such as the falling wage share, and to institutional issues, such as labour market deregulation.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 83 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, C. (2000), ‘Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables’, Annual Meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, UCLA.Google Scholar
Armingeon, K., Weisstanner, D., Engler, S., Potolidis, P. and Gerber, M. (2012), Comparative Political Data Set I 1960–2010, Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. (2007), ‘The distribution of earnings in OECD countries’, International Labour Review, 146: 1–2, 41–60.Google Scholar
Bailey, J., Coward, J. and Whittaker, M. (2011), Painful Separation, London: Resolution Foundation.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. and Hicks, T. (2013), ‘Left behind?’, APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper.Google Scholar
Beck, N. (2001), ‘Time-series cross-section data’, Annual Review of Political Science, 4: 271–93.Google Scholar
Beck, N. and Katz, J. (1995), ‘What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data’, American Political Science Review, 89: 634–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, N. and Katz, J. (2004), ‘Time-series–cross-section issues’, Annual meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, Stanford University.Google Scholar
BIS (2012), Skills for Sustainable Growth, London: Department for Business, Innovations and Skills.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. and Natali, D. (2009), ‘The politics of the new welfare state’, Background paper for the conference, The New Welfare State in Europe, Florence, 10–11 December.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. and Natali, D. (2012), The Politics of the New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cantillon, B. (2011), ‘The paradox of the social investment state’, Journal of European Social Policy, 21: 432–49.Google Scholar
Cantillon, B. and Van Lancker, W. (2013), ‘Three shortcomings of the social investment perspective’, Social Policy and Society, 12: 4, 553–64.Google Scholar
Cingranelli, D. L., Richards, D. L. and Chad Clay, K. (2013), The Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Dataset.Google Scholar
Daguerre, A. (2007), Active Labour Market Policies and Welfare Reform, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
De Deken, J. (2012), ‘Identifying the skeleton of the social investment state’, ESPAnet Annual Conference 2012, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
EC (2010), Europe 2020 in a Nutshell, Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
EC (2013a), Communication from the Commission: Towards Social Investment for Growth and Cohesion, COM(2013) 83 final, Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
EC (2013b), Education and Training 2020, Directorate General for Education and Training, Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
EC (2014), Policy Roadmap for the 2014 Implementation of the Social Investment Package, Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
Emmenegger, P. (2012), The Age of Dualization, International Policy Exchange Series, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999),Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G.et al. (eds.) (2002), Why we Need a New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, K. and Irving, Z. (eds.) (2011), The Welfare State in Challenging Times, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Fenger, M. and Ellison, M. (2013), ‘Social investment, protection and inequality with the new economy and politics of welfare in Europe’, Journal of Social Policy and Society, 12: 4, 611–24.Google Scholar
Flora, P. (ed.) (1986), Growth to Limits, Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (2001), The Global Third Way Debate, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. and Le Grand, J. (eds.) (1987), Not Only the Poor, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gough, I. (1976), The Political Economy of the Welfare State, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. (2011), The Institutional Foundations of Middle Class Democracy, London: Policy Network.Google Scholar
Hemerijck, A. (2012), ‘Stress-testing the new welfare state’, in Bonoli, G. and Natali, D., The Politics of the New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 68–92.Google Scholar
Hemerijck, A. (2013),Changing Welfare States, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ILO (2013), Why Have Wage Shares Fallen? Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. and Wren, A. (1998), ‘Equality, employment and budgetary restraint: the trilemma of the service economy’, World Politics, 50: 4, 507–546.Google Scholar
Jenson, J. (2009), ‘Redesigning citizenship regimes after neoliberalims: moving towards social investment’, Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (eds.), What Future for Social Investment?, Stockholm: Insititute for Future Studies, pp. 24–44.Google Scholar
Jenson, J. (2012), ‘A new politics for the social investment perspective: objectives, instruments, and areas of intervention in welfare regimes’, in Bonoli, G. and Natali, D. (eds.), The Politics of the New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (2002), The Future of the Capitalist State, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kok, W. (2004), Facing the Challenge: High-Level Commission, Luxembourg: European Communities.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (2003), ‘New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization’, American Political Science Review, 97: 425–46.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. (2010), Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Gray, M. and Webb, S. eds. International Social Work, Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (2012), Towards a Social Investment Welfare State?, Bristol: Policy.Google Scholar
Nelson, M. and Stephens, J. (2012), ‘Do social investment policies produce more and better jobs?’, in Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J., Towards a Social Investment Welfare State?, Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 205–234.Google Scholar
Nolan, B. (2013), ‘What use is “social investment”’?, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23: 5, 459–68.Google Scholar
Nygård, M. and Krüger, N. (2012), ‘Poverty, families and the investment state: the impact of social investment ideas on family policy discourses in Finland and Germany’, European Societies, 14: 5, 755–77.Google Scholar
Obinger, H.et al. (2011), ‘Responses to labour market divides in small states since the 1990s’, in Emmenegger, P., The Age of Dualization, International Policy Exchange Series, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 176–200.Google Scholar
O'Connor, J. (1984), The Fiscal Crisis of the State, New York: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
OECD (2011), Divided We Stand, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Offe, C. (1984), Contradictions of the Welfare State, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Okun, A. (1975), Equality and Efficiency: The Big Trade-Off, Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Palier, B. (2010), A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (ed.) (2001), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pintelon, O., Cantillon, B., Van den Bosch, K. and Whelan, C. (2013), ‘The social stratification of social risks’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23: 1, 52–67.Google Scholar
Plümper, T., Troger, V. and Manow, P. (2005) ‘Panel data analysis in comparative politics’, European Journal of Political Research, 44: 2, 327–54.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (1997), Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, DC: Institute of International Economics.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. and Schmidt, V. (eds.) (2000),Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Standing, G. (2011), The Precariat, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Standing, G. (2009), Work after Globalization, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Stolper, W. and Samuelson, P. (1941), ‘Protection and real wages’, Review of Economic Studies, 9: 58–73.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (ed.) (2004), New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. M. (1976), Essays on the Welfare State, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Vaalavuo, M. (2013), ‘The redistributive impact of “old” and “new” social spending’, Journal of Social Policy, 42: 3, 513–39.Google Scholar
Van Kersbergen, K. and Heemerijck, A. (2012), ‘Two decades of change in Europe’, Journal of Social Policy, 41: 3, 475–92.Google Scholar
Van Oorschot, W. (2006), ‘Making the difference in social Europe’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16: 1, 23–42.Google Scholar
Vandenbroucke, F., Hemerijck, A. and Palier, B. (2011), The EU Needs a Social Investment Pact, OP5, Brussels: OSE.Google Scholar
Vandenbroucke, F. and Vleminckx, K. (2011), ‘Disappointing poverty trends’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21: 450–71.Google Scholar
von Hayek, F. A. (1944),Law, Legislation and Liberty, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar