Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T22:52:42.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ambiguities and Contradictions in the Provision of Sheltered Housing for Older People*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

David Clapham  and
Moira Munro
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the current model of sheltered housing and explores a central contradiction in that model: namely that if only those people who most need and appreciate the unique features of sheltered housing were allocated places in schemes, the existing model ultimately could not provide sufficient support. This central contradiction leads to a fundamental lack of clarity in the role of sheltered housing. This is reflected in the ambiguities apparent in allocation practices, where judgements are typically made not only in relation to the tenants' needs and demands but also in relation to the impact on schemes. Evidence is presented from a recent study of sheltered and amenity housing in Scotland, which exposes these issues and suggestions are made as to how the traditional model of sheltered housing can be made more flexible and more suited to those who need and value it most.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 1990 , pp. 27 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boldy, D. (1976), ‘A study of the wardens of grouped dwellings for the elderly’, Social and Economic Administration 10, 59–67.Google Scholar
Bond, J. and Carstairs, V. (1982), Services for the Elderly. Scottish Home and Health Department, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Butler, A., Oldman, C. and Greve, J. (1983), Sheltered Housing for the Elderly, George Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (1985), ‘Mobile emergency care service’, in McGarry, M. (ed.). Community Alarm Systems for Older People, Age Concern. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Clapham, D. and Munro, M. (1988). A Comparison of Sheltered and Amenity Housing for Older People, Central Research Unit. Scottish Office. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Clapham, D. and Munro, M. (1989). The Role of the Sheltered Housing Warden: Conflict and Change, Centre for Housing Research Discussion Paper No. 21, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Griffiths, R. (1988), Community Care: Agenda for Action, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Hunt, A. (1978). The Elderly at Home, a survey carried out on behalf of the Department of Health and Social Security by the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Middleton, L. (1981), So Much for So Few, Institute of Human Ageing Research Paper, University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Oldman, C. (1986), ‘Housing policies for older people’, in Malpass, P. (ed.), The Housing Crisis, Croom Helm, Beckenham.Google Scholar
Scottish Development Department (1980), Housing for the Elderly—Scottish Housing Handbook, 5, HMSO, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Townsend, P. (1962), The Last Refuge, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Victor, C. (1987), Old Age in Modern Society: A Textbook of Social Gerontology, Croom Helm, Beckenham.Google Scholar
Wagner, G. (1988). Residential Care A Positive Choice, National Institute for Social Work, HMSO. London.Google Scholar
Wirz, H. (1981). Sheltered Housing in Scotland—A Report, Department of Social Administration, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar