Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T14:21:07.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deserving Hukou: An Exploration of How Chinese People Evaluate Migrants’ Welfare Deservingness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2022

ANDREAS MICHAEL ØSTERBY-JØRGENSEN Open the ORCID record for ANDREAS MICHAEL ØSTERBY-JØRGENSEN [Opens in a new window]
ANDREAS MICHAEL ØSTERBY-JØRGENSEN*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Social Work, Aalborg University, Kroghstræde 7, 9220 Aalborg Ø, Denmark Sino-Danish College (SDC), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Within the welfare deservingness literature, the question of how people conceive of deservingness criteria is still underexplored. Theoretical insights indicate that identity and reciprocity criteria are more fluidly conceived by people than much deservingness literature describes. Through a qualitative analysis, I explore how Chinese people evaluate the deservingness of a group of Chinese nationals (identity) who contribute (reciprocity) but are excluded from welfare: intranational Chinese migrants. I find that Chinese people have multiple conceptions of identity and reciprocity criteria. Some conceive of identity through larger communities, such as the nation, while others conceive of it through local communities, such as the family. Reciprocity can be conceived of in a less conditional way, which means that contributions generally make one deserving, and in a more conditional way, where one’s deservingness depends on one’s ability to make more specific kinds of contributions. Welfare recipients’ deservingness becomes very dependent on respondents’ conceptions of these deservingness criteria.

Keywords

DeservingnessidentitybelongingreciprocityhukouChina
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , January 2024 , pp. 129 - 147
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borjas, G. J. (1999), ‘Immigration and welfare magnets’, Journal of Labor Economics, 17, 4, 607–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmel, E. and Sojka, B. (2021), ‘Beyond welfare chauvinism and deservingness. Rationales of belonging as a conceptual framework for the politics and governance of migrants’ rights’, Journal of Social Policy, 50, 3, 645–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartier, C. (2006), ‘Symbolic city/regions and gendered identity formation in South China’, in Oakes, T. and Schein, L. (eds.), Translocal China: Linkages, Identities, and the Reimagining of Space, New York: Routledge, 138–54.Google Scholar
Chen, J., Pan, J. and Xu, Y. (2016), ‘Sources of authoritarian responsiveness: A field experiment in China’, American Journal of Political Science, 60, 2, 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Swaan, A. (1995), ‘Widening circles of identification: emotional concerns in sociogenetic perspective’, Theory, Culture & Society, 12, 2, 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fei, X. ([1947] 1992), From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, C. and Zhan, C. (2006), ‘Openness, change, and translocality: new migrants’ identification with Hainan’, in Oakes, T. and Schein, L. (eds.), Translocal China: Linkages, Identities, and the Reimagining of Space, New York: Routledge, 74–92.Google Scholar
Frederiksen, M. (2018), ‘Varieties of Scandinavian universalism: a comparative study of welfare justifications’, Acta Sociologica, 61, 1, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, M. (1966), Chinese Lineage and Society: Fukien and Kwangtung, London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, D. S. G. (2002), ‘Structuring local identity: nation, province and county in Shanxi during the 1990s’, The China Quarterly, 172, 837–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, D. S. G. (2006), ‘Shanxi as translocal imaginary: reforming the local’, in Oakes, T. and Schein, L. (eds.), Translocal China: Linkages, Identities, and the Reimagining of Space, New York: Routledge, 56–73.Google Scholar
Hayton, B. (2020), The Invention of China, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, L. (2006), ‘Urban transformation and professionalization: translocality and rationalities of enterprise in post-Mao China’, in Oakes, T. and Schein, L. (eds.), Translocal China: Linkages, Identities, and the Reimagining of Space, New York: Routledge, 109–37.Google Scholar
Im, D. (2014), ‘The legitimation of inequality: psychosocial dispositions, education, and attitudes toward income inequality in China’, Sociological Perspectives, 57, 4, 506–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jæger, M. (2007), ‘Are the “deserving needy” really deserving everywhere? Cross-cultural heterogeneity and popular support for the old and the sick in eight Western countries’, in Veghte, B. and Mau, S. (eds.), Social Justice, legitimacy and the Welfare State, Aldershot: Ashgate, 74–94.Google Scholar
Kootstra, A. (2016), ‘Deserving and undeserving welfare claimants in Britain and the Netherlands: examining the role of ethnicity and migration status using a vignette experiment’, European Sociological Review, 32, 3, 325–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremer, M. (2016), ‘Earned citizenship: labour migrants’ views on the welfare state’, Journal of Social Policy, 45, 3, 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laenen, T. (2020), Welfare Deservingness and Welfare Policy: Popular Deservingness Opinions and their Interaction with Welfare State Policies, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laenen, T., Rossetti, F. and van Oorschot, W. (2019), ‘Why deservingness theory needs qualitative research: comparing focus group discussions on social welfare in three welfare regimes’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 60, 3, 190–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, M. (2000), The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. K. (2007), Against the Law: Labor Protests in China’s Rustbelt and Sunbelt, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, J. C. and Xu, Y. (2015), China’s Social Welfare: The Third Turning Point, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Liu, T., and Shi, Q. (2020), ‘Acquiring a Beijing hukou: who is eligible and who is successful?’ The China Quarterly, 243, 855–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, T. H. ([1950] 1992), ’Citizenship and social class’, in Marshall, T. H. and Bottomore, T. (eds.), Citizenship and Social Class, London: Pluto Press, 1–52.Google Scholar
Mau, S. (2004a), The Moral Economy of Welfare States: Britain and Germany Compared, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mau, S. (2004b), ’Welfare regimes and the norms of social exchange’, Current Sociology, 52, 1, 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, M. H., Frederiksen, M. and Larsen, C. A. (2020), ‘Deservingness put into practice: constructing the (un)deservingness of migrants in four European countries’, The British Journal of Sociology, 71, 1, 112–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oakes, T. (2000), ‘China’s provincial identities: reviving regionalism and reinventing “Chineseness”’, The Journal of Asian Studies, 59, 3, 667–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakes, T. and Schein, L. (2006), ‘Translocal China: an introduction’, in Oakes, T. and Schein, L. (eds.), Translocal China: Linkages, Identities, and the Reimagining of Space, New York: Routledge, 15–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, A. (1999), Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality, Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Osipovič, D. (2015), ‘Conceptualisations of welfare deservingness by polish migrants in the UK’, Journal of Social Policy, 44, 4, 729–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeskens, T. and van der Meer, T. (2019), ‘The inevitable deservingness gap: a study into the insurmountable immigrant penalty in perceived welfare deservingness’, Journal of European Social Policy, 29, 2, 166–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeskens, T. and van Oorschot, W. (2012), ‘Disentangling the “new liberal dilemma”: on the relation between general welfare redistribution preferences and welfare chauvinism’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 53, 2, 120–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, L. (2006), ‘Negotiating scale: Miao women at a distance’, in Oakes, T. and Schein, L. (eds.), Translocal China: Linkages, Identities, and the Reimagining of Space, New York: Routledge, 213–37.Google Scholar
Song, Y. (2014), ‘What should economists know about the current Chinese hukou system?’ China Economic Review, 29, 200–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svallfors, S. (2004), ‘Class, attitudes and the welfare state: Sweden in comparative perspective’, Social Policy & Administration, 38, 2, 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theiss, M. (2021), ‘Local routes to preschool – access policies in Polish municipalities from a social citizenship perspective’, European Journal of Social Work, 24, 2, 290–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Waal, J., Achterberg, P., Houtman, D., de Koster, W. and Manevska, K. (2010), ‘“Some are more equal than others”: economic egalitarianism and welfare chauvinism in the Netherlands’, Journal of European Social Policy, 20, 4, 350–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Oorschot, W. (2000), ‘Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public’, Policy & Politics, 28, 1, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Oorschot, W. (2006), ‘Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 1, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Oorschot, W. and Roosma, F. (2015), The social legitimacy of differently targeted benefits, ImPRovE Working Paper No. 15/11, Antwerp: Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy – University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
van Oorschot, W. and Uunk, W. (2007), ‘Welfare spending and the public’s concern for immigrants: multilevel evidence for eighteen European countries’, Journal of Comparative Politics, 40, 1, 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, M. and Reeskens, T. (2013), ‘Of what cloth are the ties that bind? National identity and support for the welfare state across 29 European countries’, Journal of European Public Policy, 20, 10, 1443–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, Y. (2016), ‘Understanding inequality in China’, Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2, 3, 327–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuval-Davis, N. (2011), The Politics of Belonging: Intersectional Contestations, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Wang, R., and Lu, C. (2019), ‘A quantitative analysis of Hukou reform in Chinese cities: 2000–2016’, Growth and Change, 50, 1, 201–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar