Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T15:31:04.088Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Did the COVID-19 pandemic fuel public support for social protection?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2024

Taesim Kim Open the ORCID record for Taesim Kim [Opens in a new window]
Taesim Kim*
Affiliation:
Sogang Institute of Political Studies, Sogang University, Mapo-gu, Seoul, South Korea
*
Email: tkim@sogang.ac.kr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, both viral infection and the corresponding economic turmoil have wreaked havoc across the globe, highlighting the imperative function of the state as a social protection provider. The pandemic has seemingly created favourable political circumstances for rapidly expanding social protection, but its influences on public welfare attitudes remain unclear. In this study, I argue that the impact of pandemic-driven economic risk is too limited to spur strong public support for social protection. The employed empirical analyses using panel data collected in South Korea show that unemployment induced by the pandemic is conducive to higher degrees of individual support for social protection measures, but the impact is only short-lived. Further analyses show that, once individuals are re-employed and as the time spent in economic difficulties becomes more distant, personal unemployment experiences are no longer positively associated with support for social protection. Finally, pandemic-induced unemployment experiences have a lasting impact primarily on young adults. The evidence therefore suggests that significant institutional changes in the welfare state are hard to achieve by solely relying on the impact of economic risk.

Keywords

COVID-19economic riskwelfare statesocial policypublic attitudes
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , First View , pp. 1 - 23
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ares, M., Bürgisser, R., & Häusermann, S. (2021). Attitudinal polarization towards the redistributive role of the state in the wake of the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(sup1), 41–55.Google Scholar
Blekesaune, M. (2007). Economic conditions and public attitudes to welfare policies. European Sociological Review, 23(3), 393–403.Google Scholar
Blekesaune, M. (2013). Economic strain and public support for redistribution: A comparative analysis of 28 European countries. Journal of Social Policy, 42(1), 57–72.Google Scholar
Blumenau, J., Hicks, T., Jacobs, A., Matthews, S., & O’Grady, T. (2021). Testing negative: The non-Consequences of COVID-19 on mass ideology. APSA Preprints. https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2021-qpczc Google Scholar
Brooks, C., & Manza, J. (2006). Why do welfare states persist?. Journal of Politics, 68(4), 816–827.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, M. R. (2023). Financing the welfare state in times of extreme crisis: Public support for health care spending during the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(1), 21–40.Google Scholar
Castles, F. G. (2010). Black swans and elephants on the move: The impact of emergencies on the welfare state. Journal of European Social Policy, 20(2), 91–101.Google Scholar
Choi, Y. J., Kühner, S., & Shi, S.-J. (2022). From “new social risks” to “COVID social risks”: The challenges for inclusive society in South Korea, Hong Kong, and Taiwan amid the pandemic. Policy and Society, 41(2), 260–274.Google Scholar
Cutright, P. (1965). Political structure, economic development, and national social security programs. American Journal of Sociology, 70(5), 537–550.Google Scholar
Dauber, M. L. (2013). The sympathetic state: Disaster relief and the origins of the american welfare state, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, B., Lehner, L., & Naumann, E. (2022). Welfare state support during the COVID-19 pandemic: Change and continuity in public attitudes towards social policies in Germany. European Policy Analysis, 8(3), 297–311.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S., Rehm, P., & Schlesinger, M. (2013). The insecure American: Economic experiences, financial worries, and policy attitudes. Perspectives on Politics, 11(1), 23–49.Google Scholar
Hasenfeld, Y., & Rafferty, J. A. (1989). The determinants of public attitudes toward the welfare state. Social Forces, 67(4), 1027–1048.Google Scholar
Hornung, J., & Bandelow, N. C. (2022). Short-term health policy responses to crisis and uncertainty. Journal of Social Policy, 51(2), 365–384.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (2022). Policy Responses to COVID19. IMF. https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/imf-and-covid19/Policy-Responses-to-COVID-19 Google Scholar
Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001). An asset theory of social policy preferences. American Political Science Review, 95(4), 875–893.Google Scholar
Kaufman, M., & Srinivasan, K. (2022). Strong Policies Help Korea Navigate Uncertain Times. IMF. https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2022/05/12/CF-Korea-strong-policies Google Scholar
Kim, S. (2021). (3rd LD) Job loss largest in over 2 decades in January amid pandemic. Yonhap News Agency, 10 February.Google Scholar
Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs (2021). A Study of the Socio-Economic Impact of COVID-19 and the Effect Evaluation of Emergency Disaster Relief Funds. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. (2006). Power resources and employer-centered approaches in explanations of welfare states and varieties of capitalism: Protagonists, consenters, and antagonists. World Politics, 58(2), 167–206.Google Scholar
Krishnarajan, S., Doucette, J., & Andersen, D. (2023). Early-adulthood economic experiences and the formation of democratic support. British Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 387–406.Google Scholar
Kwon, H. (2005). Transforming the developmantal welfare state in East Asia. Development and Change, 36(3), 477–497.Google Scholar
Kwon, K. (2004). Regionalism in South Korea: Its origins and role in her democratization. Politics & Society, 32(4), 545–574.Google Scholar
Lee, S. (2018). Attitudes toward universal basic income and welfare state in Europe: A research note. Basic Income Studies, 13, 1.Google Scholar
Lee, S. (2020). Politics of universalism and unconditional social policy: Examining attitudes toward universal basic income (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3613239). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3613239 Google Scholar
Lee, S. J. (2014). Poverty amongst the elderly in South Korea: The perception, prevalence, and causes and solutions. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 4, 3.Google Scholar
Margalit, Y. (2013). Explaining social policy preferences: Evidence from the Great Recession, American Political Science Review, 107(1), 80–103.Google Scholar
Margalit, Y. (2019). Political responses to economic shocks. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 277–295.Google Scholar
Martén, L. (2019). Demand for redistribution: Individuals responses to economic setbacks. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 121(1), 225–242.Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 914–927.Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1983). Tests of a rational theory of the size of government. Public Choice, 41(3), 403–418.Google Scholar
Mendelberg, T., McCabe, K. T., & Thal, A. (2017). College socialization and the economic views of affluent Americans. American Journal of Political Science, 61(3), 606–623.Google Scholar
Nast, C. (2020). Can universal basic income fix the coronavirus crisis?. Wired UK. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/can-universal-basic-income-fix-the-coronavirus-crisis Google Scholar
Naumann, E., Buss, C., & Bähr, J. (2016). How unemployment experience affects support for the welfare state: A real panel approach. European Sociological Review, 32(1), 81–92.Google Scholar
Nettle, D., Johnson, E., Johnson, M., & Saxe, R. (2021). Why has the COVID-19 pandemic increased support for Universal Basic Income?. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), Article 1.Google Scholar
Neundorf, A., & Soroka, S. (2018). The origins of redistributive policy preferences: Political socialisation with and without a welfare state. West European Politics, 41(2), 400–427.Google Scholar
Ng, K. (2020). Spain to become first country in Europe to roll out a universal basic income. The Independent, 6 April.Google Scholar
O’Donoghue, C., Sologon, D. M., & Kyzyma, I. (2022). Novel welfare state responses in times of crises: The COVID-19 crisis versus the Great Recession. Socio-Economic Review, mwac033.Google Scholar
O’Grady, T. (2019). How do economic circumstances determine preferences? Evidence from long-run panel data. British Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 1381–1406.Google Scholar
Owens, L. A., & Pedulla, D. S. (2014). Material welfare and changing political preferences: The case of support for redistributive social policies. Social Forces, 92(3), 1087–1113.Google Scholar
Pahontu, R. L., Hooijer, G., & Rueda, D. (2021). Insuring against hunger? Long-Term political consequences of exposure to the Dutch Famine (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3895192). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3895192 Google Scholar
Pickard, J. (2020). More than 100 UK opposition politicians call for universal basic income after lockdown. Financial Times, 21 April.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1996). The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics, 48(2), 143–179.Google Scholar
Popic, T., & Burlacu, D. (2022). Welfare attitudes in crisis: The role of ideology in healthcare satisfaction in Portugal and Ireland, Journal of Social Policy, First View, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000332 Google Scholar
Rehm, P. (2009). Risks and redistribution: An individual-level analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 42(7), 855–881.Google Scholar
Rehm, P. (2016). Risk inequality and welfare states: Social policy preferences, development, and dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roosma, F., & van Oorschot, W. (2020). Public opinion on basic income: Mapping European support for a radical alternative for welfare provision. Journal of European Social Policy, 30(2), 190–205.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Song, H. K. (2003). The birth of a welfare state in Korea: The unfinished symphony of democratization and globalization. Journal of East Asian Studies, 3(3), 405–432.Google Scholar
The Economist (2021). Covid-19 has transformed the welfare state. Which changes will endure?. The Economist, 8 March. Google Scholar
Tyler, M., & Iyengar, S. (2023). Learning to dislike your opponents: Political socialization in the era of polarization. American Political Science Review, 117(1), 347–354.Google Scholar
van Apeldoorn, B., & de Graaff, N. (2022). The state in global capitalism before and after the Covid-19 crisis. Contemporary Politics, 28(3), 306–327.Google Scholar
Van Hootegem, A., & Laenen, T. (2023). A wave of support? A natural experiment on how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the popularity of a basic income. Acta Politica, 58(3), 695–713.Google Scholar
van Kersbergen, K., & Vis, B. (2013). Comparative welfare state politics: Development, opportunities, and reform. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weisstanner, D. (2022). COVID-19 and welfare state support: The case of universal basic income. Policy and Society, 41(1), 96–110.Google Scholar
Wilensky, H. L. (1974). The welfare state and equality: Structural and ideological roots of public expenditure. University of California Press.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2023). WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. https://covid19.who.int Google Scholar
You, J. and Choi, J. (2022). Will South Korea be the first country to introduce universal basic income?. KSPS-Gachon Korea Inequality Research Laboratory Working Paper Series. Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kim supplementary material

Kim supplementary material
Download Kim supplementary material(File)
File 466.1 KB