Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:46:46.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Widespread Lack Undermine the Socially Perceived Necessities Approach to Defining Poverty? Evidence from South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2012

GEMMA WRIGHT  and
MICHAEL NOBLE
GEMMA WRIGHT*
Affiliation:
Oxford Institute of Social Policy, University of Oxford, Barnett House, 32 Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2ER
MICHAEL NOBLE
Affiliation:
Oxford Institute of Social Policy, University of Oxford, Barnett House, 32 Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2ER email: michael.noble@spi.ox.ac.uk
*
email: gemma.wright@spi.ox.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The socially perceived necessities or ‘consensual’ approach to defining and measuring poverty is based on an assumption that it is possible to obtain a collective view from society on the necessities for an acceptable standard of living. The enforced lack of the necessities due – typically – to lack of resources can be regarded as poverty. The validity of the approach has been questioned on a number of grounds including the argument that people's socio-economic circumstances may influence what they define as a necessity. Widespread lack of material possessions and access to services could result in these items being regarded as ‘less necessary’, which in turn could artificially deflate the definition of poverty using this approach. Informed by the adaptive preferences literature and drawing on a nationally representative South African Socially Attitudes Survey this paper explores whether there is evidence in South Africa of an association between people's patterns of possession and their definition of items as essential. Notwithstanding the fact that possession of an item is strongly associated with people's preferences, the evidence on balance suggests that widespread lack does not undermine the validity of the approach.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 147 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abe, A. (2006), Empirical Analysis of Relative Deprivation and Poverty in Japan, IPSS Discussion Paper Series No. 2005–07, Tokyo: National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
African National Congress (ANC) (1943), Africans’ Claims in South Africa, Annual conference of the African National Congress, Bloemfontein, 16 December 1943, available at http://www.anc.org.za/ancdocs/history/claims.html.Google Scholar
African National Congress (ANC) (1955), The Freedom Charter, adopted at the Congress of the People, Kliptown, on 26 June 1955, available at www.anc.org.za/ancdocs/history/charter.html.Google Scholar
Ahmed, A. I. M. U. (2007), ‘Consensual poverty in Britain, Sweden and Bangladesh: a comparative study’, Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology, 4: 2, 1–22.Google Scholar
Barr, A. and Clark, D. (2007), A Multidimensional Analysis of Adaptation in a Developing Country Context, CSAE WPS/2007–9, Oxford: Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Barr, A. and Clark, D. (2010), ‘Do the poor adapt to low income, minimal education and ill-health?’, Journal of African Economies, 19: 3, 257–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, J. (1972), ‘The taxonomy of social need’, in McLachlan, G. (ed.), Problems and Progress in Medical Care, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, R. B. (1979), A Theory of the Good and the Right, Alderley: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Burchardt, T. (2003), ‘Identifying adaptive preferences using panel data: subjective and objective income trajectories’, Paper prepared for 3rd Conference on the Capability Approach, Pavia, Italy, 7–9 September 2003.Google Scholar
Burchardt, T. (2004), Are One Man's Rags Another Man's Riches? Identifying Adaptive Expectations Using Panel Data, CASE paper 86, London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Burchardt, T. (2005), ‘One man's rags another man's riches: identifying adaptive expectations using panel data’, Social Indicators Research, 74: 57–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchardt, T. (2006), ‘Happiness and social policy: barking up the right tree in the wrong neck of the woods’, in Bauld, L., Clarke, K. and Maltby, T. (eds.), Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, 2006, Social Policy Review, 18, Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 145–64.Google Scholar
Clark, D. A. and Qizilbash, M. (2007), Core Poverty, Vagueness and Adaptation: A New Methodology and Some Results for South Africa, Q-Squared Working Paper, No. 31, Center for International Studies, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Comim, F. (2005), ‘Capabilities and happiness: potential synergies’, Review of Social Economy, 63: 2, 161–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1951), ‘Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests’, Psychometrika, 16: 3, 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, M. and Shah, A. (1988), ‘An econometric approach to the measurement of poverty’, Oxford Economic Papers, 40: 505–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (1983), Sour Grapes, London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eurobarometer (2007), Special Eurobarometer 279/Wave 67.1: Poverty and Exclusion: Report, European Commission.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. (2001), ‘Collective preferences, obligations, and rational choice’, Economics and Philosophy, 17: 109–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giovanola, B. (2005), ‘Personhood and human richness: good and well-being in the capability approach and beyond’, Review of Social Economy, 63: 2, 249–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goedhart, T., Halberstadt, V., Kapteyn, A. and van Praag, B. (1977), ‘The poverty line: concept and measurement’, The Journal of Human Resources, 12: 4, 503–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, D., Adelman, A., Ashworth, K., Bradshaw, J., Levitas, R., Middleton, S., Pantazis, C., Patsios, D., Payne, S., Townsend, P. and Williams, J. (2000), Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. and Pantazis, C. (eds.) (1997), Breadline Britain in the 1990s, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Graham, C. and Hoover, M. (2007), Optimism and Poverty in Africa: Adaptation or a Means to Survival?, Afrobarometer Working Paper No. 76, Cape Town: The Institute for Democracy in South Africa.Google Scholar
Halleröd, B. (1994), Poverty in Sweden: A New Approach to the Direct Measurement of Consensual Poverty, Umeå Studies in Sociology, No. 106, Umeå: University of Umeå.Google Scholar
Halleröd, B. (2006), ‘Sour grapes: relative deprivation, adaptive preferences and the measurement of poverty’, Journal of Social Policy, 35: 3, 371–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halleröd, B., Bradshaw, J. and Holmes, H. (1997), ‘Adapting the consensual definition of poverty’, in Gordon, D. and Pantazis, C. (eds.), Breadline Britain in 1990s, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 213–41.Google Scholar
Harsányi, J. C. (1997), ‘Utilities, preferences and substantive goods’, Social Choice and Welfare, 14: 129–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillyard, P., Kelly, G., McLaughlin, E., Patsios, D. and Tomlinson, M. (2003), Bare Necessities: Poverty and Social Exclusion in Northern Ireland: Key Findings, Belfast: Democratic Dialogue.Google Scholar
Hoogeveen, J. G. and Özler, B. (2006), ‘Poverty and inequality in post-apartheid South Africa: 1995–2000’, in Bhorat, H. and Kanbur, R. (eds.), Poverty and Policy in Post-Apartheid South Africa, Cape Town: HSRC Press, pp. 59–94.Google Scholar
Klandermans, B., Roefs, M. and Olivier, J. (eds.) (2001), The State of the People: Citizens, Civil Society and Governance in South Africa, 1994–2000, Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
Lalljee, M., Brown, L. B. and Ginsburg, G. P. (1984), ‘Attitudes: disposition, behaviour or evaluation?’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 23: 233–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Grand, J. (2003), Individual Choice and Social Exclusion, CASE Paper No. 75, London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Leibbrandt, M., Woolard, I., Finn, A. and Argent, J. (2010), Trends in South African Income Distribution and Poverty since the Fall of Apartheid, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No.101.Google Scholar
Lelkes, O. (2005), Knowing What Is Good For You: Empirical Analysis of Personal Preferences and the ‘Objective Good’, CASE Paper No. 94, London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Levitas, R. (2006), ‘The concept and measurement of social exclusion’, in Pantazis, C., Gordon, D. and Levitas, R. (eds.), Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain: The Millennium Survey, Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 123–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, J. and Lansley, S. (1985), Poor Britain, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
McKay, S. (2004), ‘Poverty or preference: what do “consensual deprivation indicators” really measure?’, Fiscal Studies, 25: 2, 201–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mtapuri, O. (2011), ‘Developing an asset threshold using the consensual approach: results from Mashonaland West, Zimbabwe’, Journal of International Development, 23: 1, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, M., Ratcliffe, A., Magasela, W., Wright, G., Mason, D., Zichawo, S. and Chigume, R. (2004), Preliminary Findings from the Qualitative Stage of the Indicators of Poverty and Social Exclusion Project, Key Report 1, Pretoria: National Department of Social Development, Republic of South Africa.Google Scholar
Noble, M., Ratcliffe, A., Magasela, W., Wright, G., Mason, D., Zichawo, S. and Chigume, R. (2005), Methodology for the Qualitative Stage of the Indicators of Poverty and Social Exclusion Project, Key Report 2, Pretoria: Department of Social Development.Google Scholar
Noble, M., Wright, G., Magasela, W. and Ratcliffe, A. (2007), ‘Developing a democratic definition of poverty in South Africa’, Journal of Poverty, 11: 4, 117–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, B. and Whelan, C. (1996), Resources, Deprivation and Poverty, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nteziyaremye, A. and MkNelly, B. (2001), Mali Poverty Outreach Study of the Kafo Jiginew and Nyèsigiso Credit and Savings with Education Programs, Freedom from Hunger Research Paper No. 7, Davis CA: Freedom from Hunger.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (1997), ‘Flawed foundations: the philosophical critique of (a particular type of) economics’, The University of Chicago Law Review, 64: 4, 1197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2001), ‘Symposium on Amartya Sen's philosophy: 5 – adaptive preferences and women's options’, Economics and Philosophy, 17: 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantazis, C., Gordon, D. and Levitas, R. (eds.) (2006), Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain: The Millennium Survey, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Piachaud, D. (1987), ‘Problems in the definition and measurement of poverty’, Journal of Social Policy, 16: 2, 147–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillay, U., Roberts, B. and Rule, S. (eds.) (2006), South African Social Attitudes: Changing Times, Diverse Voices, Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
Pro Poor Centre (2007), The 2006 Basic Necessities Survey in Can Loc District, Ha Tinh Province, Vietnam, Ha Tinh Province, Vietnam: The Pro Poor Centre.Google Scholar
Roberts, B., wa Kivilu, M. and Davids, Y. D. (eds.) (2010), South African Social Attitudes 2nd Report: Reflections on the Age of Hope, Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, P., Naidoo, Y. and Griffiths, M. (2007), Towards New Indicators of Disadvantage: Deprivation and Social Exclusion in Australia, Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1999), Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strandh, M. (1996), ‘The question of poor attitudes: the influence of poverty on attitudes’, in Bihagen, E., Nyman, C. and Strand, M. (eds.), Three Aspects of Consensual Poverty in Sweden – Work, Deprivation, Attitudes towards the Welfare-State and Household Consumptional Distribution, Umeå Studies in Sociology, No. 109, Umeå: Umeå University, pp. 59–88.Google Scholar
Terreblanche, S. (2002), A History of Inequality in South Africa 1652–2002, Pietermartizburg: University of Natal Press.Google Scholar
Teschl, M. and Comim, F. (2005), ‘Adaptive preferences and capabilities: some preliminary conceptual explorations’, Review of Social Economy, 63: 2, 229–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Bosch, K. (2001), Identifying the Poor: Using Subjective and Consensual Measures, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Veit-Wilson, J.H. (1987), ‘Consensual approaches to poverty lines and social security’, Journal of Social Policy, 16: 2, 183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Holdt, K., Langa, M., Molapo, S., Mogapi, N., Ngubeni, K., Dlamini, J. and Kirsten, A. (2011) The Smoke that Calls: Insurgent Citizenship, Collective Violence and the Struggle for a Place in the New South Africa, Braamfontein: Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation.Google Scholar
Walker, R. (1987), ‘Consensual approaches to the definition of poverty: towards an alternative methodology’, Journal of Social Policy, 16: 2, 213–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2011) http://data.worldbank.org/country/south-africa accessed 13/01/2012)Google Scholar
Wright, G. (2008), Findings from the Indicators of Poverty and Social Exclusion Project: A Profile of Poverty Using the Socially Perceived Necessities Approach, Key Report 7, Pretoria: Department of Social Development, Republic of South Africa.Google Scholar
Wright, G. (2011a), Socially Perceived Necessities in South Africa: Comparing the Views of Sub-Groups of the Population, CASASP Working Paper No. 9, Oxford: CASASP, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Wright, G. (2011b), Socially Perceived Necessities in South Africa: Patterns of Possession, CASASP Working Paper No. 10, Oxford: CASASP, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Wright, G., Noble, M. and Magasela, W. (2010), ‘Towards a democratic definition of poverty: socially perceived necessities in South Africa’, in Roberts, B., wa, M. Kivilu and Davids, Y. D. (eds.), South African Social Attitudes 2nd Report: Reflections on the Age of Hope, Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council Press, pp. 143–66.Google Scholar