Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T21:39:11.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Redistributive Impact of ‘Old’ and ‘New’ Social Spending

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2013

MARIA VAALAVUO
MARIA VAALAVUO*
Affiliation:
National Institute for Health and Welfare, Health and Social Economics CHESS, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271 Helsinki, Finland. email: Maria.Vaalavuo@thl.fi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The welfare state literature has recently identified a shift from the protection against traditional risks to social investment. In this new future-oriented and activation-based social policy, the focus is on the redistribution of opportunities instead of income. Even if vertical redistribution from the rich to poor may be only one rationale of social action, it should not be overlooked when directing social policy from insurance to investment. This article has two objectives: first, it investigates how real this shift is in macro-economic terms, and, secondly, whether the increased focus on new social risks and social investment has possibly changed welfare states’ commitment to redistribute from the rich to poor. I compare the distribution of benefits from ‘old’ spending categories (such as retirement or unemployment) with those from ‘new’ ones (such as having care responsibilities). Analysing six European countries representing different welfare state regimes, I find no evidence that new social spending would mean necessarily renouncing egalitarian ambitions. On the contrary, in all countries the distribution of new spending is more equal or pro-poor than the spending on old social risks. Different households benefit in distinct ways: the elderly benefiting the most from traditional spending (with the exception of elderly care that is categorised here as ‘new’ social spending) and families with children and single parents from new spending.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , July 2013 , pp. 513 - 539
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaberge, R. and Langørgen, A. (2006), ‘Measuring the benefits from public services: the effects of local government spending on the distribution of income in Norway’, Review of Income and Wealth, 52: 1, 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aaberge, R., Bhuller, M., Langørgen, A. and Mogstad, M. (2010), The Distributional Impact of Public Services When Needs Differ, Iza Discussion Paper No. 4826, March 2010.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2007), Government Benefits, Taxes and Household Income 2003–2004.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2006), ‘New social risks and the politics of post-industrial social policies’, in Armingeon, K. and Bonoli, G., The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States. Adapting Post-War Social Policies to New Social Risks, Oxon: Routledge, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Bovenberg, A. L. (2007), The Life-Course Perspective and Social Policies: An Issues Note, November 2007, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, J. and Holmes, J. (2013), ‘An analysis of equity in redistribution to the retired and children over recent decades in the OECD and UK’, Journal of Social Policy, 42: 1, 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Canberra Group (2001), Expert Group on Household Income Statistics, Final Report and Recommendations, Ottawa: The Canberra Group.Google Scholar
Cantillon, B. (2011), ‘The paradox of the social investment state: growth, employment and poverty in the Lisbon era’, Journal of European Social Policy, 21: 5, 432–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celdràn, X., Bermejo, E., Puente, R., Pastor, C., Seder, R., Lacuesta, J. and Pastor, J. (2009), El Sistema Estatal de Atencíon Sosiosanitaria en el Àmbito de la Dependencia 2009, Valencia: IBV, Asociación para el Cuidado de la Calidad de Vida (CUIDA).Google Scholar
Comas-Herrera, A., Wittenberg, R., Costa-Fonti, J., Gori, C., Di Maio, A., Patxot, C., Pickard, L., Pozzi, A. and Rothgang, H. (2006), ‘Future long-term care expenditure in Germany, Spain, Italy, and the United Kingdom’, Ageing and Society, 26: 285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. and Sarasa, S. (2002), ‘The generational conflict reconsidered’, Journal of European Social Policy, 12: 1, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EU-SILC (various dates), http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/microdata/eu_silc.Google Scholar
European Commission (2006), The Impact of Ageing on Public Expenditure: Projections for the EU25 Member States on Pensions, Health Care, Long-Term Care, Education and Unemployment Transfers (2004–2050), Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2004), Development of a Methodology for the Collection of Harmonised Statistics on Childcare, Working Papers and Studies, Luxembourg: European Communities.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2013), ‘People with unmet needs for medical examination by sex, age, reason and income quintile’, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tsdph270.Google Scholar
Evandrou, M., Falkingham, J., Hills, J. and Le Grand, J. (1993), ‘Welfare benefits in kind and income distribution’, Fiscal Studies, 14: 1, 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, I., Rainwater, L. and Smeeding, T. (2005), ‘Welfare state expenditures and the redistribution of well-being: children, elders, and others in comparative perspective’, Luxembourg Income Study, Working Paper No. 387, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Ghysels, J. and Van Lancker, W. (2010), ‘The unequal benefits of family activation: an analysis of the social distribution of family policy among families with young children’, CSB Working Paper No. 10/08, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp, October 2010.Google Scholar
Giddens, A., Diamond, P. and Liddle, R. (eds.) (2006), Global Europe, Social Europe, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, M. and Smith, P. (2001), ‘Equity of access to health care services: theory and evidence from the UK’, Social Science and Medicine, 53: 9, 1149–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Graeve, D. and Van Ourti, T. (2003), ‘The distributional impact of health financing in Europe: a review’, The World Economy, 26: 10, 1459–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández-Quevado, C., Jones, A. M., López-Nicolás, A. and Rice, N. (2006), ‘Socio-economic inequalities in health: a comparative longitudinal analysis using the European Community Household Panel’, Social Science and Medicine, 63: 5, 1246–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, M., Rodrigues, R., Hoffmann, F., Gasior, K. and Marin, B. (2009), Facts and Figures on Long-Term Care: Europe and North America, Vienna: European Centre For Social Welfare Policy and Research.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. and Kühner, S. (2009), ‘Towards productive welfare? A comparative analysis of 23 OECD countries’, Journal of European Social Policy, 19: 1, 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, C. (2008), ‘Worlds of welfare services and transfers’, Journal of European Social Policy, 18: 2, 151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenson, J. and Saint-Martin, D. (2003), ‘New routes to social cohesion? Citizenship and the social investment state’,Canadian Journal of Sociology, 28: 1, 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, F. (2008), ‘The effects of taxes and benefits on household income, 2006–2007’, Economic and Labour Market Review, 2: 7, Office for National Statistics, July 2008.Google Scholar
Kennett, P. (2001), Comparative Social Policy: Theory and Research, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Kunst, A. E., Bos, V., Lahelma, E., Bartley, M., Lissau, I., Regidor, E., Mielck, A., Cardano, M., Dalstra, J. A. A., Geurts, J. J. M., Helmert, U., Lennartsson, C., Ramm, J., Spadea, J., Stronneger, W. J. and Mackenbach, J. P. (2005), ‘Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in self-assessed health in ten European countries’, International Journal of Epidemiology, 34: 2, 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakin, C. (2004), ‘The effects of taxes and benefits on household income, 2002–2003’, Economic Trends, 607, June, 39–84.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. (1982), The Strategy of Equality: Redistribution and the Social Services, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Lister, R. (2003), ‘Investing in the citizen-workers of the future: transformations in citizenship and the state under New Labour’, Social Policy and Administration, 37: 5, 427–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marical, F., Mira D'ercole, M., Vaalavuo, M. and Verbist, G. (2006), ‘Publicly-provided goods and the distribution of resources’, Working Paper for Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Martin, J. and Pearson, M. (2005), ‘Time to change: towards an active social policy agenda’, OECD Observer, No. 248, March.Google Scholar
Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (2009), ‘What future for social investment?’, Research Report 2009/1, Institute for Future StudiesGoogle Scholar
Morgan, K. (2002), ‘Does anyone have a “Libre Choix”? Subversive liberalism and the politics of French child care policy’, in Michel, S. and Mahon, R. (eds.), Childcare Policy at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring, New York: Routledge, chapter 6 .Google Scholar
OECD (2005), Long-Term Care for Older People, OECD Health Project, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (2008) Education at a Glance 2008, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (2012), OECD Family Database, Paris: OECD, www.oecd.org/social/family/database.Google Scholar
Pavolini, E. and Ranci, C. (2008), ‘Restructuring the welfare state: reforms in long-term care in western European countries’, Journal of European Social Policy, 18: 3, 246–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, D., Nelms, L. and Smyth, P. (2004), ‘Beyond neo-liberalism: the social investment state?’, Social Policy Working Paper Number 3, Brotherhood of St Laurence and University of Melbourne Centre for Public Policy.Google Scholar
Pintelon, O., Cantillon, B., van den Bosch, K. and Whelan, C. T. (2011), ‘The social stratification of social risks’, Working Paper No. 11/04, April 2011, CSB, University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
Ringen, S. (1987), The Possibility of Politics: A Study in the Political Economy of the Welfare State, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Salter, B. (1998), The Politics of Change in the Health Service, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sancho Castiello, M., De La Pezuela Pinto, M. and Fernández Moreno, M. (2006), ‘Servicíos Sociales Para Personas Mayores en Espana, Enero 2006’, Las Personas Mayores en Espana. Datos Estadísticos Estatales y por Comunidades Autónomas, vol. I, Coleccíon Estudios, Serie Documentos Estadísticos No. 22008, Madrid: Ministerio De Trabajo Y Asuntos Sociales.Google Scholar
Sefton, T. (2002), ‘Recent changes in the distribution of the social wage’, Case Paper 62, November 2002, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
Sipilä, J. (1997), Social Care Services: Key to the Scandinavian Welfare Model, Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Smeeding, T., Saunders, S., Coder, J., Jenkins, S., Frtzell, J., Hagenaars, A., Hauser, R. and Wolfson, M. (1993), ‘Poverty, inequality, and family living standards impact across seven nations: the effect of noncash subsidies for health, education and housing’, Review of Income and Wealth, 39: 3, 229–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckmest, E. (1996), ‘Noncash benefits and income distribution’, Luxembourg Income Study, Working Paper No. 100, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2003), ‘Introduction: open markets versus welfare citizenship: conflicting approaches to policy convergence in Europe’, Social Policy and Administration, 37: 6, 539–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2004), ‘New risks and social change’, in Taylor-Gooby, P. (ed.), New Risks, New Welfare, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsakloglou, P. and Antoninis, M. (1999), ‘On the distributional impact of public education: evidence from Greece’, Economics of Education Review, 18: 4, 439–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaalavuo, M. (2011), ‘Towards an improved measure of income inequality: the impact of public services on income inequality – an international comparison’, Ph.D. thesis, June, European University Institute, Florence.Google Scholar
Vandenbroucke, F., Hemerijk, A. and Palier, B. (2011), ‘The EU needs a social investment pact’, Opinion Paper No. 5/May 2011, Observatoire Social Européen.Google Scholar
Van Doorslaer, E., Koolman, X. and Jones, A. M. (2004), ‘Explaining income-related inequalities in doctor utilization in Europe’, Health Economics, 13: 629–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Kersbergen, K. and Hemerijk, A. (2012), ‘Two decades of change in Europe: the emergence of the social investment state’, Journal of Social Policy, 41: 3, 475–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar