Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T06:42:09.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Industrial and Occupational Change in Peninsular Malaysia, 1947–70*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2011

Extract

Only a couple of decades ago, the prospects for socio-economic development in the Third World seemed much brighter than at present. The economic theories of the 1950s and early 1960s, at least those of the North American variety, prescribed more capital investment (from domestic and foreign sources) which then would lead to a “take-off” into sustained economic growth. Political theorists advocated Western political development as an irreversible step which would lead to modern democratic societies. Other social scientists suggested that the spread of modern values — “modernity” — to the developing world would solve the basic problems of underdevelopment. Those days of simpleminded theories were buoyed by the short-term euphoria of the decolonization process. If the political leaders of the newly-independent states were determined to achieve development, as indeed they were, it seemed possible that these strategies would lead to progressive social and economic changes.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bairoch, Paul, The Economic Development of the Third World Since 1900 (Berkeley, 1975), Ch. 11Google Scholar; World Bank, World Tables 1976 (Baltimore, 1976), p. 392Google Scholar.

2 Seers, Dudley and Joy, Leonard, Development in a Divided World (Middlesex, 1971)Google Scholar; International Labour Office, Meeting Basic Needs: Strategies for Eradicating Mass Poverty and Unemployment (Geneva, 1977)Google Scholar.

3 Hermassi, Elbaki, “Changing Patterns in Research on the Third World”, in Turner, Ralph, Coleman, James, and Fox, Renee (eds.), Annual Review of Sociology 4 (Palo Alto, 1978): 239–57Google Scholar.

4 Cockcroft, James, Frank, Andre Gunder, and Johnson, Dale, Dependence and Underdevelopment (New York, 1972)Google Scholar; Oxaal, Ivar, Barnett, Tony, and Booth, David, Beyond the Sociology of Development (London, 1975)Google Scholar.

5 Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Modern World-System (New York, 1974)Google Scholar.

6 Doctor, K.C. and Gallis, Hans, “Modern Sector Employment in Asian Countries”, International Labour Review 90 (Dec. 1964): 544–60Google Scholar; Oberai, A.S., Changes in the Structure of Employment with Economic Development (Geneva, 1978)Google Scholar; Oshima, Harry T., “Labor Force ‘Explosion’ and the Labor Intensive Sector in Asian Growth”, Economic Development and Cultural Change 19 (Jan. 1971): 161–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Ma, Ronald and Poh-Seng, You, “The Economic Characteristics of the Population of the Federation of Malaya”, Malayan Economic Review 5 (1960): 10–45Google Scholar; Hassan, Riaz, “Some Aspects of Occupational and Class Structure in West Malaysia”, Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science 1, No. 1 (1973): 17–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Hirschman, Charles, Ethnic and Social Stratification in Peninsular Malaysia, Rose Monograph Series (Washington, D.C., 1975), Ch. 3Google Scholar.

8 Fisher, Allan G.B., The Clash of Progress and Security (London, 1935)Google Scholar; and Clark, Colin, The Conditions of Economic Progress, 3rd Edition (London, 1960)Google Scholar.

9 Clark, op. cit., p. 492.

10 Kuznets, Simon, “Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations, II: Industrial Distribution of National Product and Labor Force”, Economic Development and Cultural Change 5 (July, supplement to No. 4, 1957): 1–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kuznets, Simon, Modern Economic Growth (New Haven, 1966)Google Scholar; Chenery, Hollis and Syrquin, Moises, Patterns of Development (New York, 1975)Google Scholar; and Oberai, op. cit.

11 Singelmann, Joachim, “The Sectoral Transformation of the Labor Force in Seven Industrialized Countries, 1920–1970”, American Journal of Sociology 83 (Mar. 1978): 1224–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Bauer, P.T. and Yamey, B.S., “Economic Progress and Occupational Distribution”, Economic Journal 61 (Dec. 1951): 741–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fisher, Allan G.B., “A Note on Tertiary Production”, Economic Journal 62 (Dec. 1952): 820–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fisher, Allan G.B., “Tertiary Production: A Postscript”, Economic Journal 64 (Sept. 1954): 619–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Triantes, S.G., “Economic Progress, Occupational Redistribution and International Terms of Trade”, Economic Journal 63 (Sept. 1953): 627–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Moore, Wilbert, “Changes in Occupational Structure”, in Lipset, S.M. and Smelser, N.J. (eds.), Social Structure and Mobility in Economic Development (Chicagp, 1966), pp. 194–212Google Scholar; Farrag, Abdelmegid, “The Occupational Structure of the Labor Force”, Population Studies 18 (July, 1964): 17–34Google Scholar; and Treiman, Donald, “Industrialization and Social Stratification”, Sociological Inquiry 40 (Spring, 1970): 207–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Ramos, Joseph, Labor and Development in Latin America (New York, 1970); Oshima, op. citGoogle Scholar.

15 Sandhu, Kernial Singh, “Emergency Resettlement in Malaya”, Journal of Tropical Geography 18 (1964): 157–83Google Scholar.

16 Ness, Gayl, “Economic Development and Goals of Government”, in Gungwu, Wang (ed.), Malaysia: A Survey (New York, 1964), pp. 307–22Google Scholar.

17 Silcock, T.H., “General Review of Economic Policy”, in Silcock, T.H. and Fisk, E.K. (eds.), The Political Economy of Independent Malaya (University of California, Berkeley, 1963), pp. 242–75Google Scholar; Chong-Yah, Lim, Economic Development of Modern Malaya (Kuala Lumpur, 1967)Google Scholar; Lim, David, Economic Growth and Development in West Malaysia, 1947–1970 (Kuala Lumpur, 1973)Google Scholar; and Rao, V. V. Bhanoji, National Accounts of West Malaysia, 1947–1971 (Singapore, 1976)Google Scholar.

18 Malaya, A Report on the 1947 Census of Population, by Tufo, M. V. Del (London, 1949)Google Scholar; Department of Statistics, Federation of Malaya, 1957 Population Census of the Federation of Malaya: Report No. 14, by Fell, H. (Kuala Lumpur, 1960)Google Scholar.

19 For more details, write to the Chief Statistician, Department of Statistics, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

20 Department of Statistics, Malaysia, 1970 Population Census of Malaysia: General Report, Two Volumes, by Chander, R. (Kuala Lumpur, 1977)Google Scholar.

21 For more discussion of changes in concepts and measurement of labour force variables between censuses, see Soman, S., Ayub, Ahmed Yazid, and Khoon, Wong Tat, Şources of Labour Supply — Present and Future, Department of Statistics, Research Paper No. 13 (Kuala Lumpur, 1978)Google Scholar.

22 Malaya, op. cit., p. 485.

23 Department of Statistics, Federation of Malaya, op. cit., p. 97; Department of Statistics, Malaysia, op. cit., Vol.2:252.

24 Hirschman, Charles, “Demographic Trends in Peninsular Malaysia, 1947–75”, Population and Development Review 6, No. 1 (Mar. 1980): 103–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Department of Statistics, Malaysia, op. cit., Vol. 1:416.

26 For more review of labour force participation trends, see Soman et al., op. cit.; Snodgrass, Donald, “Growth and Utilization of Malaysian Labor Supply”, The Philippine Economic Journal 15, Nos. 1–2 (1976): 273313Google Scholar; Hirschman, Charles and Aghajanian, Akbar, “Women's Labor Force Participation and Socio-economic Development in Peninsular Malaysia, 1957–1970”, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 11, No. 1 (Mar. 1980): 3049CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Ismail, Abdul Halim, “The Smallholding Sector and the New Economic Policy”, in Chee, Stephen and Mun, Khoo Siew (eds.), Malaysian Economic Development and Policies (Kuala Lumpur, 1975), pp. 219–29Google Scholar.

28 Fujimoto, Akimo, “Land Tenure and Land Reform in Malaysian Rice Production”,Unpublished paper presented at the Second Colloquium of the Malaysia Society of the Asian Studies Association of Australiaat Townsville,29–31 Aug. 1979Google Scholar.

29 Department of Statistics, Federation of Malaya, op. cit., p. 33.

30 For analysis of socio-economic divisions, see Aries, J.P., “Ethnic and Socio-economic Patterns in Malaysia”, International Labour Review 104 (1971): 527–54Google Scholar; and Hirschman, Ethnic and Social Stratification in Peninsular Malaysia, op. cit.

31 For earlier studies of some of these data, see Ma and You, op. cit.; Hassan, op. cit.; and Hirschman, Ethnic and Social Stratification in Peninsular Malaysia, op. cit.

32 Urban unemployment, especially among youth, is a problem of significant magnitude. See Charles Hirschman, “Unemployment Among Urban Youth in Peninsular Malaysia, 1970”, Economic Development and Cultural Change. Forthcoming.