Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-05T20:58:48.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On nonregular ultrafilters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Jussi Ketonen*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Extract

In this paper we shall construct nonregular ultrafilters showing many of the model-theoretic properties of their regular counterparts. The crucial idea in these constructions is to replace the use of regularity by independent functions. We shall use the notation and terminology of [1], our fundamental concepts being defined as follows:

Definition 1.1. (1) A uniform ultrafilter D over a cardinal κ is regular if there is a family {Xαα < κ} so that every infinite intersection of these Xα's is empty.

(2) A filter F over a cardinal κ is ω1-saturated if there is no family of sets {aαα < ω1} so that for every α < β < ω1

For more on regular ultrafilters, see [2]. The germinal theorem on the subject of nonregular ultrafilters is the following well-known result of Jack Silver:

Theorem 1.2 [1, Theorem 1.39]. If F is an ω1-saturated κ-complete filter over κ, then any ultrafilter extending F is nonregular.

This result will be the cornerstone of our constructions. Of course, the existence of a filter of the above type depends on large cardinal axioms. For more on un ω1-saturated κ-complete filters, see [1].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Prikry, K., Changing measurable to accessible cardinals, Rozprawy Matematyczne, vol. LXVIII (1970), pp. 152.Google Scholar
[2]Keisler, H. J., A Survey of ultraproducts, Logic, methodology, and philosophy of science, Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress, edited by Bar-Hillel, Y., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965, pp. 112126.Google Scholar
[3]Shelah, S., On the cardinality of utlraproduct of finite sets, this Journal, vol. 35 (1970), pp. 8384.Google Scholar