Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T21:37:02.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some consequences of an infinite-exponent partition relation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

J. M. Henle*
Affiliation:
Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts 01060

Extract

Beginning with Ramsey's theorem of 1930, combinatorists have been intrigued with the notion of large cardinals satisfying partition relations. Years of research have established the smaller ones, weakly ineffable, Erdös, Jonsson, Rowbottom and Ramsey cardinals to be among the most interesting and important large cardinals in set theory. Recently, cardinals satisfying more powerful infinite-exponent partition relations have been examined with growing interest. This is due not only to their inherent qualities and the fact that they imply the existence of other large cardinals (Kleinberg [2], [3]), but also to the fact that the Axiom of Determinacy (AD) implies the existence of great numbers of such cardinals (Martin [5]).

That these properties are more often than not inconsistent with the full Axiom of Choice (Kleinberg [4]) somewhat increases their charm, for the theorems concerning them tend to be a little odd, and their proofs, circumforaneous. The properties are, as far as anyone knows, however, consistent with Dependent Choice (DC).

Our basic theorem will be the following: If k > ω and k satisfies k→(k)k then the least cardinal δ such that has a δ-additive, uniform ultrafilter. In addition, if ACω is assumed, we will show that δ is greater than ω, and hence a measurable cardinal. This result will be strengthened somewhat when we prove that for any k, δ, if then .

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Henle, J. M., Aspects of choiceless combinatorial set theory, Ph.D. Thesis, M.I.T., 1976.Google Scholar
[2]Kleinberg, E. M., Strong partition properties for infinite cardinals, this Journal, vol. 35 (1970), pp. 410428.Google Scholar
[3]Kleinberg, E. M., AD⊦‘the ℵn are Jonsson cardinals and K ω is a Rowbottom cardinal’, Annals of Mathematical Logic (to appear).Google Scholar
[4]Kleinberg, E. M. and Seiferas, J. I., Infinite exponent partition relations and well-ordered choice, this Journal, vol. 38 (1973), pp. 299308.Google Scholar
[5]Martin, D. A., Determinateness implies many cardinals are measurable, preprint, 1971.Google Scholar
[6]Tinkelman, R., Some consequences of infinite exponent partition relations, Ph.D. Thesis, M.I.T., 1976.Google Scholar