Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T00:44:58.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MORE ON GALOIS COHOMOLOGY, DEFINABILITY, AND DIFFERENTIAL ALGEBRAIC GROUPS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2024

OMAR LEÓN SÁNCHEZ*
Affiliation:
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER OXFORD ROAD, MANCHESTER, M13 9PL, UK
DAVID MERETZKY
Affiliation:
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME 255 HURLEY, NOTRE DAME, IN 46556, USA E-mail: dmeretzk@nd.edu
ANAND PILLAY
Affiliation:
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME 255 HURLEY, NOTRE DAME, IN 46556, USA E-mail: apillay@nd.edu

Abstract

As a continuation of the work of the third author in [5], we make further observations on the features of Galois cohomology in the general model theoretic context. We make explicit the connection between forms of definable groups and first cohomology sets with coefficients in a suitable automorphism group. We then use a method of twisting cohomology (inspired by Serre’s algebraic twisting) to describe arbitrary fibres in cohomology sequences—yielding a useful “finiteness” result on cohomology sets.

Applied to the special case of differential fields and Kolchin’s constrained cohomology, we complete results from [3] by proving that the first constrained cohomology set of a differential algebraic group over a bounded, differentially large, field is countable.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Symbolic Logic

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kamensky, M. and Pillay, A., Interpretations and differential Galois extensions . International Mathematics Research Notices , vol. 2016 (2016), pp. 73907413.10.1093/imrn/rnw019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolchin, E., Differential Algebraic Groups , Academic Press, Orlando, 1985.Google Scholar
León Sánchez, O. and Pillay, A., Differential Galois cohomology and parameterized Picard–Vessiot extensions . Communications in Contemporary Mathematics , vol. 23 (2021), no. 8, pp. 125.Google Scholar
Marker, D. and Pillay, A., Differential Galois theory III: Some inverse problems . Illinois Journal of Mathematics , vol. 41 (1997), pp. 453461.10.1215/ijm/1255985739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillay, A., Remarks on Galois cohomology and definability, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 62 (1997), no. 2, pp. 487492.Google Scholar
Pillay, A., Some foundational questions concerning definable groups . q , vol. 179 (1997), no. 1, pp. 179200.Google Scholar
Pillay, A., The Picard–Vessiot theory, contrained cohomology, and linear differential algebraic groups . Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées , vol. 108 (2017), pp. 809817.10.1016/j.matpur.2017.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platonov, V. and Rapinchuk, A., Algebraic Groups and Number Theory , Academic Press, San Diego, 1994.Google Scholar
Poizat, B., Groupes Stables , Nur al-mantiq wal-ma’rifah, Villeurbanne, 1987.Google Scholar
Rosenlicht, M., Some basic theorems on algebraic groups . American Journal of Mathematics , vol. 78 (1956), no. 2, pp. 401443.10.2307/2372523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serre, J. P., Galois Cohomology , Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 1997.10.1007/978-3-642-59141-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serre, J. P., Groupes de Congruence, Séminaire Bourbaki, vol. 10 (1968), pp. 275291.Google Scholar