Article contents
A weak variation of shelah's I[ω2]
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 March 2014
Abstract
We use a κ+-Mahlo cardinal to give a forcing construction of a model in which there is no sequence ⟨ Aβ : β < ω2 ⟩ of sets of cardinality ω1 such that
is stationary.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2004
References
REFERENCES
[1]Baumgartner, James E., Taylor, Alan D., and Wagon, Stanley, On splitting stationary subsets of large cardinals, this Journal, vol. 42 (1977), pp. 203–214.Google Scholar
[2]Harrington, Leo and Shelah, Saharon, Some exact equiconsistency results in set theory, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 26 (1985), pp. 178–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Jech, Thomas, Stationary subsets of inaccessible cardinals, Axiomatic set theory (Boulder, Colorado, 1983), Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 31, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1984, pp. 115–142.Google Scholar
[4]Mitchell, William, Aronszajn trees and the independence of the transfer property, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 5 (1972/1973), pp. 21–46.Google Scholar
[5]Shelah, Saharon, Reflecting stationary sets and successors of singular cardinals. Archive of Mathematical Logic, vol. 31 (1991), pp. 25–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6
- Cited by