Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T18:43:14.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ON PSEUDO-EHRESMANN SEMIGROUPS

Part of: Semigroups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2018

SHOUFENG WANG*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan, 650500, PR China email wsf1004@163.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As generalizations of inverse semigroups, Ehresmann semigroups are introduced by Lawson and investigated by many authors extensively in the literature. In particular, Lawson has proved that the category of Ehresmann semigroups and admissible morphisms is isomorphic to the category of Ehresmann categories and strongly ordered functors, which generalizes the well-known Ehresmann–Schein–Nambooripad (ESN) theorem for inverse semigroups. From a varietal perspective, Ehresmann semigroups are derived from reducts of inverse semigroups. In this paper, inspired by the approach of Jones [‘A common framework for restriction semigroups and regular $\ast$-semigroups’, J. Pure Appl. Algebra216 (2012), 618–632], Ehresmann semigroups are extended from a varietal perspective to pseudo-Ehresmann semigroups derived instead from reducts of regular semigroups with a multiplicative inverse transversal. Furthermore, motivated by the method used by Gould and Wang [‘Beyond orthodox semigroups’, J. Algebra368 (2012), 209–230], we introduce the notion of inductive pseudocategories over admissible quadruples by which pseudo-Ehresmann semigroups are described. More precisely, we show that the category of pseudo-Ehresmann semigroups and (2,1,1,1)-morphisms is isomorphic to the category of inductive pseudocategories over admissible quadruples and pseudofunctors. Our work not only generalizes the result of Lawson for Ehresmann semigroups but also produces a new approach to characterize regular semigroups with a multiplicative inverse transversal.

MSC classification

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2018 Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 

Footnotes

The author is supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (11661082,11301470).

References

Armstrong, S. M., ‘Structure of concordant semigroups’, J. Algebra 118 (1988), 205260.Google Scholar
Blyth, T. S., ‘Inverse transversals: A guided tour’, in: Proc. Int. Conf., Braga, Portugal, 18–23 June 1999 (eds. Smith, P., Giraldes, E. and Martins, P.) (World Scientific Publishing, River Edge, NJ, 2000), 2643.Google Scholar
Blyth, T. S. and Almeida Santos, M. H., ‘E-special ordered regular semigroups’, Comm. Algebra 43 (2015), 32943312.Google Scholar
Blyth, T. S. and Almeida Santos, M. H., ‘A classification of inverse transversals’, Comm. Algebra 29 (2001), 611624.Google Scholar
Blyth, T. S. and McFadden, R., ‘Regular semigroups with a multiplicative inverse transversal’, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 92 (1982), 253270.Google Scholar
Brancoa, M. J. J., Gomes, G. M. S. and Gould, V., ‘Ehresmann monoids’, J. Algebra 443 (2015), 349382.Google Scholar
El-Qallali, A., ‘Abundant semigroups with a multiplicative type A transversal’, Semigroup Forum 47 (1993), 327340.Google Scholar
Fountain, J. B., Gomes, G. M. S. and Gould, V., ‘A Munn type representation for a class of E-semiadequate semigroups’, J. Algebra 218 (1999), 693714.Google Scholar
Gomes, G. M. S. and Gould, V., ‘Fundamental Ehresmann semigroups’, Semigroup Forum 63 (2001), 1133.Google Scholar
Gould, V., ‘Notes on restriction semigroups and related structures; formerly (weakly) left $E$ -ample semigroups’, http://www-users.york.ac.uk/ varg1/restriction.pdf (2010).Google Scholar
Gould, V., ‘Restriction and Ehresmann semigroups’, in: Proc. Int. Conf., Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia, 7–10 October 2010 (eds. Hemakul, W., Wahyuni, S. and Sy, P. W.) (World Scientific Publishing, Hackensack, NJ, 2012), 265288.Google Scholar
Gould, V. and Wang, Y. H., ‘Beyond orthodox semigroups’, J. Algebra 368 (2012), 209230.Google Scholar
Guo, X. J., ‘Abundant semigroups with a multiplicative adequate transversal’, Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.) 18 (2002), 229244.Google Scholar
Hollings, C., ‘From right PP monoids to restriction semigroups: a survey’, Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2 (2009), 2157.Google Scholar
Hollings, C., ‘The Ehresmann–Schein–Nambooripad theorem and its successors’, Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math. 5 (2012), 414450.Google Scholar
Hollings, C., ‘Three approaches to inverse semigroups’, Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math. 8 (2015), 294323.Google Scholar
Howie, J. M., An Introduction to Semigroup Theory (Academic Press, London, 1976).Google Scholar
Jones, P. R., ‘A common framework for restriction semigroups and regular ∗-semigroups’, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 216 (2012), 618632.Google Scholar
Jones, P. R., ‘Almost perfect restriction semigroups’, J. Algebra 445 (2016), 193220.Google Scholar
Lawson, M. V., ‘Semigroups and ordered categories I: The reduced case’, J. Algebra 141 (1991), 422462.Google Scholar
Lawson, M. V., Inverse Semigroups, the Theory of Partial Symmetries (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998).Google Scholar
Meakin, J., ‘The structure mappings on a regular semigroups’, Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. (2) 21 (1978), 135142.Google Scholar
Nambooripad, K. S. S., ‘Structure of regular semigroups’, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 22(224) (1979), 1103.Google Scholar
Tang, X. L. and Gu, Z., ‘Words on free bands with inverse transversals’, Semigroup Forum 91 (2015), 101116.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. H., ‘Beyond regular semigroups’, Semigroup Forum 92 (2016), 414448.Google Scholar
Wang, S. F., ‘A Munn type representation of abundant semigroups with a multiplicative ample transversal’, Period. Math. Hungar. 73 (2016), 4361.Google Scholar