Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T11:38:39.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Austrians on Relative Inflation as a Cause of Crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Hansjörg Klausinger
Hansjörg Klausinger
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Augasse, 2–6, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The development of Austrian economics in the interwar period was marked by the contrast between its high esteem at the beginning of the 1930s and its dwindling influence throughout the remainder of the decade. A variety of reasons have been conjectured for this decline (and the eventual dissolution) of the Austrian school of economics (see Caldwell 1988, pp. 517–21). A rarely mentioned factor of a more sociological nature that may have contributed to or that at least indicated the school's decline was its loss of coherence during the late 1930s, when, as a consequence of the emigration of the most prominent members, Vienna lost its role as the Austrian school's main center of communication. Insofar as this lack of coherence led not just to diversity within a unifying framework but to crucial divergences among the school's leading members, this might help to explain why after 1945 the Austrians were no longer perceived as a distinct school—some parts of their thinking had been fused into the neoclassical mainstream and others had largely fallen into disregard.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , June 2003 , pp. 221 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bode, Karl and Haberler, Gottfried. 1935. “Monetary Equilibrium and the Price Level in a Progressive Economy: A Comment.” Economica 2 (02): 75–81.Google Scholar
Boianovsky, Mauro. 2000. “In Search of a Canonical History of Macroeconomics in the Interwar Period: Haberler's Prosperity and Depression Revisited.” In Psalidopoulos, Michalis, ed., The Canon in the History of Economics. London: Routledge, pp. 156–79.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Bruce J. 1988. “Hayek's Transformation.” History of Political Economy 20 (Winter): 513–41.Google Scholar
Craver, Earlene. 1986. “The Emigration of the Austrian Economists.” History of Political Economy 18 (Spring): 1–32.Google Scholar
Haberler, Gottfried. 1931. “Die Kaufkraft des Geldes und die Stabilisierung der Wirtschaft.” Schmollers Jahrbuch 55 (6): 993–1023.Google Scholar
Haberler, Gottfried. 1932a. “Money and the Business Cycle.” In Wright, Quincy, ed., Gold and Monetary Stabilization: Lectures on the Harris Foundation 1932. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 41–74.Google Scholar
Haberler, Gottfried. 1932b. “Price Stabilization and the Business Cycle: Introduction to the Discussion.” In Norman Wait Harris Memorial Foundation, Gold and Monetary Stabilization: Reports of Round Tables. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 369–411.Google Scholar
Haberler, Gottfried. 1933. “Der Stand und die nächste Zukunft der Konjunkturforschung.” In Clausing, Gustav, ed., Festschrift für Arthur Spiethoff. München: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 92–103.Google Scholar
Haberler, Gottfried. 1934a. Systematic Analysis of the Theories of the Business Cycle. Geneva: League of Nations. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Haberler, Gottfried. 1934b. “Banking Policy and Stable Prices.” The Economist: Monthly Book Supplement (11 10): 8.Google Scholar
Haberler, Gottfried. 1936. “some Reflections on the Present Situation of Business Cycle Theory.” Review of Economic Statistics 18 (02): 1–7.Google Scholar
Haberler, Gottfried. 1937. Prosperity and Depression: A Theoretical Analysis of Cyclical Movements. Geneva: League of Nations.Google Scholar
Haberler, Gottfried. 1938. “some Comments on Mr. Kahn's Review of Prosperity and Depression.” Economic Journal 48 (06): 322–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagemann, Harald and Trautwein, Hans-Michael. 1998. “Cantillon and Ricardo Effects: Hayek's Contributions to Business Cycle Theory.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 5 (Summer): 292–316.Google Scholar
Harrod, Roy F. 1934a. “The Expansion of Creditin an Advancing Community.” Economica 1 (08): 287–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrod, Roy F. 1934b. “Rejoinder to Mr. Robertson.” Economica 1 (11): 476–78.Google Scholar
Harrod, Roy F. 1934c. “Banking Policy and Stable Prices.” The Economist: Monthly Book Supplement (10 6): 8.Google Scholar
Harrod, Roy F. 1934d. “Banking Policy and Stable Prices. [Reply to the Critics.]” The Economist: Monthly Book Supplement (11 10): 8.Google Scholar
Harrod, Roy F. 1935. “Rejoinder to Drs. Haberler and Bode.” Economica 2 (02): 82–84.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1924. “Das Stabilisierungsproblem in Goldwährungslandern.” Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Sozialpolitik n.s. 4 (2): 366–90.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1925. “Die Währungspolitik der Vereinigten Staaten seit der Überwindung der Krise von 1920.” Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Sozialpolitik n.s. 5 (1): 25–63, (2): 254–317.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1928. “Das intertemporale Gleichgewichtssystem der Preise und die Bewegungen des ‘Geldwertes’.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 28 (07): 33–76.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1929. Geldtheorie und Konjunkturtheorie. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky. Reprint Salzburg: W. Neugebauer, 1976.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1931a. Prices and Production. London: Routledge & Sons.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1931b. Preise und Produktion. Wien: Julius Springer, 1976. Reprint Wien: Springer 1976.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1932a. “Das Schicksal der Goldwährung.” Der Deutsche Volkswirt (02 12 and 19): 642–45, 677–81.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1932b. “Money and Capital: A Reply.” Economic Journal 42 (06): 237–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1933a. Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle. London: Jonathan Cape. (Translation of Hayek 1929.)Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August, ed. 1933b. Beiträge zur Geldtheorie. Wien: Julius Springer.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1933c. “Über neutrales Geld.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 4 (10): 659–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1933d. “Der Stand und die nächste Zukunft der Konjunkturforschung.” In Clausing, Gustav, ed., Festschrift für Arthur Spiethoff. München: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 110–17. (English translation in Hayek 1939, pp. 171–82.)Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1934. “Capital and Industrial Fluctuations.” Econometrica 2 (04): 152–67.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1939. Profits, Interest and Investment. And Other Essays on the Theory of Industrial Fluctuations. London: Routledge & Sons.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1984. Money, Capital, and Fluctuations: Early Essays, edited by McCloughry, Roy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1999. Good Money, Part I: The New World. The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek, Vol. 5, edited by Kresge, Stephen. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Steven. 2001. “Review Essay—Hayek: Good Money.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23 (03): 99–104.Google Scholar
Jonung, Lars, ed. 1991. The Stockholm School of Economics Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Richard F. 1937. “The League of Nations Enquiry into the Trade Cycle.” Economic Journal 47 (12): 670–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas 1934. “Banking Policy and Stable Prices.” The Economist, Monthly Book Supplement (11 10): 7.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas. 1986. “Recollections of an Economist.” Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 39 (03): 3–26.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1973. The General Theory and After, Part I: Preparation. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. XIII. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Klausinger, Hansjörg. 1995. “schumpeter and Hayek: Two Views of the Great Depression Reexamined.” History of Economic Ideas 3 (3): 93–127.Google Scholar
Klausinger, Hansjörg. 2003. “Hayek Translated. Some Words of Caution.” History of Economics Review 37 (Winter): forthcoming.Google Scholar
Kresge, Stephen. 1999. “Introduction.” In Good Money, Part I: The New World. The Collected Works of F.A.Hayek, Vol. 5, edited by Kresge, Stephen. London: Routledge, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
Laidler, David. 1991. “The Austrians and the Stockholm School: Two Failures in the Development of Modern Macroeconomics?” In Jonung, Lars, ed., The Stockholm School of Economics Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 295–327.Google Scholar
Laidler, David. 1999. Fabricating the Keynesian Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Machlup, Fritz. Papers. Hoover Instititution Archives. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Machlup, Fritz. 1931. Borsenkredit, Industriekredit und Kapitalbildung. Wien: Julius Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machlup, Fritz. 1940. The Stock Market, Credit and Capital Formation. London: William Hodge & Co. (Translation of a revised version of Machlup 1931.)Google Scholar
Mises, Ludwig. 1924. Theorie des Geldes und der Umlaufsmittel 2nd edition. München-Leipzig, Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Mises, Ludwig. 1928. Geldwertstabilisierung und Konjunkturpolitik. Jena: G. Fischer. (Translation in Mises 1978, 57–171.)Google Scholar
Mises, Ludwig. 1935. The Theory of Money and Credit. London: Jonathan Cape. Reprint Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1981. (Translation of Mises 1924).Google Scholar
Mises, Ludwig. 1978. On the Manipulation of Money and Credit, edited by Greaves, Percy L. Jr., New York: Free Market Books.Google Scholar
Monatsberichte des Österreichischen Instituts für Konjunkturforschung, Vol. 3 (02, 04 and 10), 1929.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1933. “Der Gleichgewichtsbegriff als Instrument der theoretischen Analyse.” In Hayek, F. A., ed., Beiträge zur Geldtheorie. Wien: Julius Springer, pp. 361–487.Google Scholar
Neisser, Hans. 1931. “Der Kreislauf des Geldes.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 33 (03): 365–408.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1931. “Foreword.” In F. A. Hayek, Prices and Production. London: Routledge & Sons, pp. vii–xii.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1934. The Great Depression. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robertson, Dennis H. 1934a. “Mr. Harrod and the Expansion of Credit.” Economica 1 (11): 473–75.Google Scholar
Robertson, Dennis H. 1934b. “Industrial Fluctuation and the Natural Rate of Interest.” Economic Journal 44 (12): 650–56.Google Scholar
Selgin, George. 1995. “The ‘Productivity Norm’ versus Zero Inflation in the History of Economic Thought.” History of Political Economy 27 (Winter): 705–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selgin, George. 1999. “Hayek versus Keynes on How the Price Level Ought to Behave.” History of Political Economy 31 (Winter): 699–721.Google Scholar
Sraffa, Piero. 1932. “Dr. Hayek on Money and Capital.” Economic Journal 42 (03): 42–53.Google Scholar
Stable Prices or Neutral Money? 1934. The Economist, Monthly Book Supplement (07 21): 1–2.Google Scholar
Steindl, Frank. 1995. Monetary Interpretations of the Great Depression. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Zappia, Carlo. 2001. “sraffa on Hayek: Unexpected Influences.” In Cozzi, Terenzio and Marchionatti, Roberto, eds., Piero Sraffa's Political Economy: A Centenary Estimate. London: Routledge, pp. 333–55.Google Scholar