Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-5mhkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-05T15:08:26.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Discovery of Comparative Advantage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

John Aldrich
John Aldrich
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Torrens [in 1815] clearly preceded Ricardo [in 1817] in publishing a fairly satisfactory formulation of the doctrine [of comparative costs]. It is unquestionable, however that Ricardo is entitled to the credit for first giving due emphasis to the doctrine, for first placing it an appropriate setting, and for obtaining general acceptance for it by economists.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 379 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich, J. 2002. “James Mill on Comparative Advantage: Texts from the Elements.” Available at http://www.economics.soton.ac.uk/staff/aldrich/jamesmill.htmGoogle Scholar
Anon H. M. 1701. Considerations upon the East-India Trade. In McCulloch, J. R., ed., Early English Tracts on Commerce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Chipman, J. 1965. “A Survey of the Theory of International Trade: Part 1, The Classical Theory.” Econometrica 33 (07): 477–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. 1894. “The Theory of International Values, Part III.” Economic Journal 4 (12): 606–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, L. 1987. Foreign Trade and the National Economy: Mercantilist and Classical Perspectives. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, J. H. 1911. “Ricardo and Torrens”. Economic Journal 21 (09): 455–68.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1979. The Economics of David Ricardo. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T. W. 1978. On Revolutions and Progress in Economic Knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacLeod, C. 1983. “Henry Martin and the Authorship of the ‘Considerations upon the East-India Trade’.” Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 56 (11) 222–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maneschi, A. 1998. Comparative Advantage in International Trade: A Historical Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. 1808. Commerce Defended. Reprinted in Winch, D., ed., Mill, James: Selected Economic Writings. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1966.Google Scholar
Mill, J. 1818. “Colony”. Supplement to the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Editions of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, edited by Napier, Macvey. Edinburgh: Constable.Google Scholar
Mill, J. 1821. Elements of Political Economy. London: Baldwin, Cradock and Joy.Google Scholar
Mill, J. 1824. Elements of Political Economy second edition revised and corrected. London: Baldwin, Cradock and Joy.Google Scholar
Mill, J. 1826. Elements of Political Economy, third edition revised and corrected. London: Baldwin, Cradock and Joy.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1844. “Of the Laws of Interchange between Nations: and the Distribution of the Gains of Commerce among the Countries of the Commercial World.” In Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy. Reprinted in Robson, J. M., ed., Essays on Economics and Society (1). Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1848–1862. Principles of Political Economy with Some of their Applications to Social Philosophy, fifth edition in 1862, edited by Ashley, W. J.. London: Longmans, 1909.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1873. Autobiography, edited by Stillinger, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. P. 1970. J. R. McCulloch: A Study in Classical Economics. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. P. 1975. The Classical Economists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pennington, J. 1840. A Letter to Kirkman Finley, Esq. on the Importation of Foreign Corn etc. In Sayers, R. S., ed., Economic Writings of James Pennington. London: London School of Economics, 1963.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1925. “In Memoriam: Alfred Marshall.” In Pigou, A. C., ed., Memorials of Alfred Marshall. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1815. An Essay on the Effects of a Low Price of Corn on the Profits of Stock etc. In Sraffa, P., ed., Works & Correspondence of David Ricardo, Vol. IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1817/1819/21. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Variorum edition in Sraffa, P., ed., Works & Correspondence of David Ricardo, Vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. 1958. Robert Torrens andthe Evolution of Classical Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. 1967. Introduction to Robson, J. M. ed. Essays on Economics and Society, Vol. 1. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Ruffin, R. J. 2002. “David Ricardo's Discovery of Comparative Advantage.” History of Political Economy 34 (4): 727–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligman, E. R. A. 1903. “On Some Neglected British Economists—I.” Economic Journal 13 (09): 335–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. 1776. Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, edited by Campbell, R. H. & Skinner, A. S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, W. 1807. Britain Independent of Commerce. London: Savage.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1930. “An Alleged Correction of Ricardo.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 44 (05): 539–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sraffa, P., ed. 1952a. Works & Correspondence of David Ricardo, Vol. VI. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P., ed. 1952b. Works & Correspondence of David Ricardo, Vol. VII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P., ed. 1952c. Works & Correspondence of David Ricardo, Vol. IX. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1955. “The Nature and Role of Originality in Scientific Progress.” Economica 22 (11): 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1976. “The Scientific Uses of Scientific Biography, with Special Reference to J. S. Mill.” In The Economist as Preacher. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982, pp. 86–97.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1980. “Merton on Multiples, Denied and Affirmed.” In The Economist as Preacher. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982, pp. 98–103.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1982. The Economist as Preacher. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thweatt, W. O. 1976. “James Mill and the Early Development of Comparative Advantage.” History of Political Economy 8 (Summer): 207–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thweatt, W. O. 1986. “James and John Mill on Comparative Advantage: Sraffa's Account Corrected.” In Visser, H. and Schoorl, E., eds., Trade in Transit. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1808. The Economists Refuted, edited by Groenewegen, P. D.. Fairfield, NJ: Kelley, 1993.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1815. Essay on the External Corn Trade. London: Hatchard.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1820. Essay on the External Corn Trade, 2nd edition. London: Hatchard.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1821. Essay on the Production of Wealth. Introduction by J. Dorfman. Fairfield, NJ: Kelley, 1965.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1826. Essay on the External Corn Trade, 3rd edition. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1827. Essay on the External Corn Trade, 4th edition. London: Longman. The text of the new edition of 1829 is identical except for the addition of an appendix. The 1829 edition is reprinted Fairfield, NJ: Kelley.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1844. The Budget: On Commercial and Colonial Policy. London: Smith & Elder.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1857. The Principles and Practical Operations of Sir Robert Peel's Act of 1844 Explained and Defended, etc, 2nd edition. London: Longman, Brown & Green.Google Scholar
Viner, J. 1937. Studies in the Theory of International Trade. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Winch, D. N., ed. 1966. James Mill: Selected Economic Writings. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar