Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T19:26:29.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Emergence of the Neoclassical Consumption Function: The Formative Years, 1940–1952

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

J. Allan Hynes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

History, if viewed as a repository for more than anecdote or chronology, could produce a decisive transformation in the image of science by which we are now possessed (Kuhn, 1962a, p. 1).

Certain types of experimental findings serve as benchmarks, permanent facts about phenomena which any future theory must accommodate, and which in conjunction with comparable theoretical benchmarks, pretty permanently force us in one direction. … The remarkable fact about recent physical science is that it creates a new, collective, human artifact, by giving full range to three fundamental human interests, speculation, calculation, and experiment. By engaging in collaboration between the three, it enriches each in a way that would be impossible otherwise (Hacking, 1983, p. 248).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 25 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allën, R. G. D. and Bowley, A.. 1935. Family Expenditure, P. S. King, London.Google Scholar
Boland, L. 1979. “A Critique of Friedman's Critics,” Journal of Economic Literature, 17, 503–522.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1945. “The Consumption Concept in Economics,” American Economic Review, 35, 1–14.Google Scholar
Brady, Dorothy S. 1951. “Research on the Size Distribution of Income,” in Studies in Income and Wealth, 13, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.Google Scholar
Brady, Dorothy S. 1952. “Family Savings in Relation to Changes in the Level and Distribution of Income,” in Studies in Income and Wealth, 15, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.Google Scholar
Brady, Dorothy S. and Rose, Friedman. 1947. “Savings and the Income Distribution,” in Studies in Income and Wealth, 10, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.Google Scholar
Brïdgeman, Percy W. 1936. The Nature Physical Theory, Dover Publications, New York.Google Scholar
De Marchi, Neil and Mark, Blaug, eds. 1991. Appraising Economic Theories: Studies in the Methodology of Research Programs, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Duesenberry, James. 1948. “Income–Consumption Relations and their Implications,” reprinted in Williams, Harold R. and Huffnagle, John D., eds., Macroeconomic Theory, Selected Readings, Appelton-Century Crofts, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
Duesenberry, James. 1949. Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumption Behavior, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ezekiel, Mordecai. 1942. “Statistical Investigations of Saving, Consumption, and Investment: I,” American Economic Review, 32, 22–49.Google Scholar
Fisher, Irving. 1930. The Theory of Interest, Augustus M. Kelley, New York, 1961.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1953. “The Methodology of Positive Economics,” in Essays in Positive Economics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1957. A Theory of the Consumption Function, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton and Simon, Kuznets. 1945. Income From Independent Professional Practice, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Christopher L. 1991. “Do Economists Test Theories?—Demand Analysis and Consumption Analysis as Tests of Theories of Economic Methodology,” in De Marchi and Blaug, 1991.Google Scholar
Gordon, Donald F. 1955. “Operational Propositions in Economic Theory,” Journal of Political Economy, 63, 150–161.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hansen, Alvin. 1941. Fiscal Policy and Business Cycles, Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. 1939. Value and Capital, 2d ed., Oxford University Press, London, 1946.Google Scholar
Katona, George and Janet, Fisher. 1951. “Postwar Changes in the Income of Identical Consumer Units,” in Studies in Income and Wealth, 13, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1908. “Comment,” in Johnson, E. and Moggridge, D. E., eds., The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, 21, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983, 178–179.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, New York.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Harper and Row, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank H. 1933. The Economic Organization, Harper and Row, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Tjalling C. 1947. “Measurement Without Theory,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 29, 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KuhnThomas, S. Thomas, S. 1959. “The Essential Tension: Tradition and Innovation in Scientific Research,” reprinted in Kuhn, 1977.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank H. 1962a. The Structure of Scientific Revolution, 2d ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank H. 1962b. “The Historical Structure of Scientific Discovery,” reprinted in Kuhn, 1977.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank H. 1976. “Mathematical versus Experimental Traditions in the Development of Physical Sciences,” reprinted in Kuhn, 1997.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank H. 1977. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Kuznets, Simon. 1942. Uses of Income in Peace and War, Occasional Paper no. 6, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.Google Scholar
Kuznets, Simon. 1943. “The Why and How of Distributions of Income by Size,” in Studies in Income and Wealth, 5, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.Google Scholar
Kuznets, Simon. 1947. “Comment,” in Studies in Income and Wealth, 10, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.Google Scholar
Kuznets, Simon. 1952. “Directions of Further Inquiry,” in Studies in Income and Wealth, 15, National Bureau of Economics Research, New York.Google Scholar
Mack, Ruth P. 1948. “The Direction of Change of Income and the Consumption Function,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 30, 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. 1948. Principles of Economics, 8th ed. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald. 1985. The Rhetoric of Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
Modigliani, Franco. 1949. “Fluctuations in the Saving-Income Ratio: A Problem in Economic Forecasting,” in Studies in Income and Wealth, 11, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.Google Scholar
Modigliani, Franco. 1980. The Collected Scientific Papers of Franco Modigliani, 2, edited by Andrew, Abel, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Modigliani, Franco and Richard, Brumberg. 1952. “Utility Analysis and Aggregate Consumption Functions: An Attempt at Integration,” in Modigliani, 1980.Google Scholar
Modigliani, Franco and Richard, Brumberg. 1954. “Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function,” in Post-Keynesian Economics, reprinted in Modigliani, 1980.Google Scholar
Mosak, Jacob L. 1945. “Forecasting Postwar Demands: III,” Econometrica, 13, 25–53.Google Scholar
Ohlin, Bertil. 1937. “Some Notes on the Stockholm Theory of Savings and Investment,” Economic Journal, 67, 53–69, 221–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Margaret G. 1952. “Effect of Income Concept Upon Expenditure Curves of Farm Families,” in Studies in Income and Wealth, 15, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1937. “A Note on the Measurement of Utility,” Review of Economics Studies, 4, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1943. “Full Employment after the War,” reprinted in Joseph, Stiglitz, ed., The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul Samuelson, 2, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1966.Google Scholar
Schultz, Henry. 1938. The Theory and Measurement of Demand, Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Smithies, Arthur. 1945. “Forecasting Postwar Demand: I,” Econometrica, 13, 1–14.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1939. “The Limitations of Statistical Demand Curves,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 34, 469–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1950. “The Development of Utility Theory,” Journal of Political Economy, 58, reprinted in Essays in the History of Economics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1965.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1952. The Theory of Price, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1954. “The Early History of Empirical Studies of Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Political Economy, 62, reprinted in Essays in the History of Economics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1965.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1972. “The Adoption of the Marginal Utility Theory,” History of Political Economy, 4, 571–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Richard and Stone, W. M.. 1938–1939. “The Measurement of the Marginal Propensity to Consumer,” Review of Economic Studies, 6, 1–22.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. J. 1989. “The Early History of the Consumption Function,” Oxford Economic Papers, 41, 131–149.Google Scholar
Tobin, James. 1951. “Relative Income, Absolute Income, and Saving,” reprinted in Essays in Economics, 2: Consumption and Econometrics, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1987.Google Scholar
Vickery, William. 1947. “Resource Distribution Patterns and the Classification of Families,” in Studies in Income and Wealth, 10, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.Google Scholar
Vining, Rutledge. 1949. “Methodological Issues in Quantitative Economics,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 31, 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, W. Allen and Milton, Friedman. 1942. “The Empirical Derivation of Indifference Functions,” in Oskar, Lange and Francis, McIntyre, eds, Studies in Mathematical Economics and Econometrics, Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1986. General Equilibrium Analysis: Studies in Appraisal, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woytinsky, W. S. 1946. “Relationship Between Consumers' Expenditures, Savings, and Disposable Income,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 28, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar