Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T01:36:45.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Origins and Development of the Trend Toward Value-Free Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

S. A. Drakopoulos
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The idea of value-free economics is an old methodological issue. It has given rise to one of the most important controversies in the history of economic thought. The discussion was important because it had to do with the scientific nature of economics. One can still find a significant number of methodological works (e.g. Coddington 1972, Gordon 1977, Samuels 1977, Sugden 1981, Colander 1994) which echo this old controversy. Most economists today, though, would agree that the claim of an economic theory free from values is essential in establishing the scientific nature of the discipline. A positive, value-free economics, in the sense of not relying on any particular set of value judgments or on any philosophical or psychological framework, is generally seen as the ideal. This approach has crucially influenced important branches of economics such as microeconomic theory. The current established position was a product of a historical process which played a significant role in the formation of the body of economic theory. Furthermore, the idea of what is value-free economics has changed since its first introduction as a scientific ideal. The nature of this change is also important for understanding the present conception of the scientific character of economics.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , Fall 1997 , pp. 286 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaug, M. 1980. The Methodology of Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1985. Economic Theory in Retrospect, 4th ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cairnes, J. 1875. The Character and Logical Method of Political Economy, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. 1981. “Protocol Statements and the Formal Mode of Speech,” in Hanfling, O., ed., Logical Positivism, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Coats, A. W. 1976. “Economics and Psychology: the Death and Resurrection of a Research Program,” in Latsis, S., ed., Method and Appraisal in Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Coddington, A. 1972. “Positive Economics,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 5, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colander, D. 1994. “The Art of Economics by the Numbers,” in Backhouse, R., ed., New Directions in Economic Methodology, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Daston, L. 1992. “Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective,” Social Studies of Science, 22, 597–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dear, P. 1992. “From Truth to Disinterestedness in the Seventeenth Century,” Social Studies of Science, 22, 619–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drakopoulos, S. 1989. “The Historical Perspective of the Problem of Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility,” Journal of Economic Studies, 16, 23–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drakopoulos, S. 1991. Values and Economic Theory, Gower-Avebury, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1953. “The Methodology of Economics,” in Hausman, 1984.Google Scholar
Fisher, I. 1965. Mathematical Investigations in the Theory of Value and Price, Augustus M. Kelley, New York.Google Scholar
Gide, C and Rist, C.. 1915. A History of Economic Doctrines, George Harrp, London.Google Scholar
Gordon, S. 1977. “Social Science and Value Judgements,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 10, 529–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, A. 1931. The Development of Economic Doctrine, Longman, London.Google Scholar
Hanfling, O. 1981. Logical Positivism, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. 1984. The Philosophy of Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. 1939. “The Foundations of Welfare Economics,” Economic Journal, 49, 696–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, J. 1946. Value and Capital, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. and Allen, R. G. D.. 1934. “A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value,” Economica, 1, 52–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. 1826. “Of Standards of Taste,” in Philosophical Works, 3, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T. W. 1964. Positive Economics and Policy Objectives, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T. W. 1981. The Politics and Philosophy of Economics, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Jackson, P. 1992. “Welfare Economics,” in Maloney, J., ed., What's New in Economics, Manchester University Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
Jevons, S. 1871. The Theory of Political Economy, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Karayiannis, A. 1995. History of Economic Methodology, Interbooks, Athens.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. N. 1904. The Scope and Method of Political Economy, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Klappholz, K. 1964. “Value Judgments and Economics,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 15, 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klappholz, K. and Agassi, J.. 1959. “Methodological Prescriptions in Economics,” Economica, 26, 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leamer, E. 1983. “Let's Take the Con out of Econometrics”, American Economic Review, 75, 31–43.Google Scholar
Lipsey, R. 1983. Positive Economics, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.Google Scholar
Loomes, G and Sugden, R.. 1983. “A Rationale for Preference Reversal,” American Economic Review, 73, 428–432.Google Scholar
Machina, M. 1989. “Choice under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved,” in Hey, J., ed., Current Issues in Microeconomics, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Machlup, F. 1984. “Professor Samuelson on Theory and Realism,” in Caldwell, B., ed., Appraisal and Criticism in Economics, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Mayer, T. 1993. Truth versus Precision in Economics, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Menger, C. 1963. Problems of Economics and Sociology, translated by Nack, F., University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1874. Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy, Longman, London.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. 1989. More Heat than Light, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, P. 1991. “The When, How and the Why of the Mathematical Expression in the History of Economic Analysis,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 145–157.Google Scholar
Myrdal, G. 1953. The Political Element in the Development of Economic Theory, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Nagel, E. 1961. The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1986. The View from Nowhere, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ng, Y-K. 1979. Welfare Economics, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1971. Manual of Political Economy, edited by Schwier, A. and Page, A., translated by A. Schwier, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Porter, T. 1992. “Quantification and the Accounting Ideal in Science,” Social Studies of Science, 22, 633–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, L. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. 1938. “Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: A Comment,” Economic Journal, 48, 635–641.Google Scholar
Samuels, W. 1977. “Ideology in Economics,” in Modern Economic Thought, Weintraub, S., ed., Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. 1938. “A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behavior,” Economica, 5, 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1954. History of Economic Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1982. Choice, Welfare and Measurement, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shackle, G. 1955. Uncertainty in Economics, Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. 1883. The Principles of Political Economy, London.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1976. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Raphael, D. and Macfie, A., eds., Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. 1981. The Political Economy of Public Choice, Martin Robertson, Oxford.Google Scholar
Walras, L. 1954. Elements of Pure Economics, translated by Allen, W. Jaffé and Unwin, , London.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1984. “Objectivity and Understanding in Economics,” in Hausman, , 1984.Google Scholar
Wicksteed, P. 1933. The Common Sense of Political Economy, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Winch, D. 1972. “Marginalism and the Boundaries of Economic Science,” History of Political Economy, 4, 325–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, S. 1978. The Foundations of Paul Samuelson's Revealed Preference Theory, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar