Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T15:23:00.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biological Analogies in Marshall's Work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Neil B. Niman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Alfred Marshall, who once proclaimed that the Mecca of the economist lies in Economic Biology, is remembered more for the mechanical analogies contained in the appendices of his Principles of Economics. Subsequent revisions of Marshall based on the mechanical principles he incorporated into the theory of the firm (Robbins 1928; Pigou 1928), the theory of competition (Robinson 1933; Chamberlin 1933), and the theory of value (Hicks and Allen 1934), succeeded in completely removing the corpus of economic theory from the domain of biology.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , June 1991 , pp. 19 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowler, P. 1988. The Non-Darwinian Revolution, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlin, E. 1933. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Coats, A. W. 1967. “Sociological Aspects of British Economic Thought (CA. 1880–1930),” Journal of Political Economy, 75, 706–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G., Freeman, C.Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., and Soete, L., eds. 1988. Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter Publishers, London.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. and Allen., R. G. D. 1934. “A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value,” Economica, 1, 52–76, 196–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. 1989. “Schumpeter versus Darwin: In re Malthus,” Southern Economic Journal, 56, 410–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1924. “Alfred Marshall,” Economic Journal, 34, 311–72, reprinted in Pigou 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, D., ed. 1985. The Darwinian Heritage, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Levine, A. L. 1983. “Marshall's Principles and the ‘Biological Viewpoint’: A Reconsideration,” The Manchester School, 3, 276–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, T. 1976. “Alfred Marshall: Victorian Relevance for Modern Economics,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, 425–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloney, J. 1985. Marshall, Orthodoxy and the Professionalisation of Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1885. “The Present Position of Economics,” reprinted in Pigou 1966.Google Scholar
Marshall, A.. 1897. “The Old Generation of Economists and the New,” reprinted in Pigou 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, A.. 1898. “Mechanical and Biological Analogies in Economics,” reprinted in Pigou 1966.Google Scholar
Marshall, A.. 1920. Principles of Economics, Eighth Edition, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. 1984. “Physics and the ‘Marginalist Revolution,’” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 8, 361–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, P.. 1984. “The Role of Conservation Principles in 20th Century Economic Theory,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 14, 461–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, P.. 1989. More Heat Than Light, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, L. 1982. “Biological Theory and Technological Entrepreneurship in Marshall's Writings,” Eastern Economic Journal, 8, 3–13.Google Scholar
Moss, L.. 1990. “Evolutionary Change and Marshall's Abandoned Second Volume,” presented at the Kress Society Seminar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, S. 1984. “The History of the Theory of the Firm from Marshall to Robinson and Chamberlin: The Source of Positivism in Economics,” Economica, 51, 307–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. and Winter, S.. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Niman, N. 1991. “The Entrepreneurial Function in the Theory of the Firm,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1922. “Empty Economic Boxes: A Reply,” Economic Journal, 32, 458–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C.. 1928. “An Analysis of Supply,” Economic Journal, 38, 238–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C.. 1966. Memorials of Alfred Marshall, A. M. Kelly, New York.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. 1928. “The Representative Firm,” Economic Journal, 38, 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. 1933. The Economics of Imperfect Competition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schweber, S. 1980. “Darwin and the Political Economists: Divergence of Character,” Journal of the History of Biology, 13, 189–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schweber, S.. 1985. “The Wider British Context in Darwin's Theorizing,” in Kohn, D., ed. 1985. The Darwinian Heritage, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Shove, H. 1942. “The Place of Marshall's Principles in the Development of Economic Theory,” Economic Journal, 52, 294–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, H. 1896. The Principles of Biology, D. Appleton and Company, New York.Google Scholar
Spencer, H.. 1966. First Principles. Fourth Edition. Otto Zeller, Osnabruk.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1926. “The Laws of Returns Under Competitive Conditions,” Economic Journal, 36, 535–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, J. 1975. The Early Economic Writings of Alfred Marshall, 1867–1890, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Young, R. 1985. Darwin's Metaphor, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar