Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T09:46:54.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultivating Sympathy: Sophie Condorcet's Letters on Sympathy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Evelyn L. Forget
Evelyn L. Forget
Affiliation:
Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 750 Bannatyne Ave., Winnipeg MB, R3E 0W3, Canada.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1798, Sophie de Grouchy, the marquise de Condorcet, published a translation of the seventh edition of Adam Smith's Theory of Moral Sentiments (1792), along with a series of eight “letters” on the subject of sympathy. These letters are, in fact, substantial essays that allow us to discern how she read Smith. Intellectual historians have a tendency to privilege an author's intent, and to read the Theory of Moral Sentiments in order to determine what Smith actually meant, and how meaning was constructed in the context of a particular intellectual environment. As long ago as 1978, literary theorists such as Wolfgang Iser suggested that a reader's response is at least as interesting a question as an author's intent (Iser 1978). And Sophie de Grouchy is no ordinary reader. Her translation of, and commentary on, Smith's work allow us to see how a theory constructed in the intellectual context of the Scottish Enlightenment would be received by a different intellectual community. While de Grouchy shared much of the background that informed Smith's work, she could not write a commentary on sympathy during the Terror without taking into account recent French political experience and debate. And, I argue, her reading was not merely idiosyncratic, but rather representative of a particular group of intellectuals seized with the problem of adapting Enlightenment theory to the political reality of the Republic.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , September 2001 , pp. 319 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alibert, J. L. 1806. “Éloge historique de Pierre Roussel.” In Pierre Roussel, Système physique et moral de la femme, suivi d'un fragment du système physique et moral de l'homme, et d'un essai sur la sensibilité, et … d'une note sur les sympathies…, seventh edition. Paris: Caille et Ravier, 1820.Google Scholar
Ando, Takaho. 1983. “Mme de Condorcet et la philosophie de la ‘sympathie’.” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 216: 335–36.Google Scholar
Arena, R. 2000. “The French Liberal School in the Nineteenth-Century.” In Forget, E. L. and Peart, S., eds., Reflecting on the Classical Canon in Economics: Essays in Honour of Samuel Hollander. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boissel, Thierry. 1988. Sophie de Condorcet, Femme des Lumières. Paris: Presses de la Renaissance.Google Scholar
Cabanis, P. J. G. 1802. Rapports du physique et du moral de l'homme. Paris: Victor Masson et fils, 1867.Google Scholar
Cabanis, P. J. G. 1956. Oeuvres philosophiques, edited by Lehec, Claude and Cazeneuve, Jean. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Chaussinand-Nogaret, G. 1984. “La Marquise de Condorcet, la Revolution et la République.” Histoire 71: 30–38.Google Scholar
Condorcet-O'Connor, Éliza. 1841. “Notes biographiques sur Mme de Condorcet et sur Mme Vernet.” In Robinet. 1893. Condorcet. Sa Vie, Son Œuvre. Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1968.Google Scholar
Dawson, D. 1991. “Is Sympathy So Surprising? Adam Smith and French Fictions of Sympathy.” Eighteenth-Century Life 15 (1–2): 147–62.Google Scholar
Folbre, N. 1993. “Socialism, Feminist and Scientific.” In Ferber, M. A. and Nelson, J. A., eds., Beyond Economic Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 94–110.Google Scholar
Fontaine, P. 1997. “Identification and Economic Behavior: Sympathy and Empathy in Historical Perspective.” Economics and Philosophy 13: 261–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forget, E. L. 1999. The Social Economics of Jean-Baptiste Say: Markets and Virtue. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forget, E. L. 2001. “Saint-Simonian Feminism.” Feminist Economics. 7(1): 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forget, E. L. 2001. “Jean-Baptiste Say on Spontaneous Order.” History of Political Economy. 33(2): 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grouchy, S. 1798. “Lettres à C[abanis], sur la théorie des sentimens moraux.” In Adam Smith, Théorie des sentimens moraux, translated from the 7th edition [1792] by Sophie de Grouchy, Marquise de Condorcet. Paris: F. Buisson.Google Scholar
Guillois, Antoine. 1897. La marquise de Condorcet. Sa Famille, Son Salon, Ses Amis. Paris: Paul Ollendorff.Google Scholar
Isambert, François André; 1855. “Condorcet (Marie-Louise-Sophie de Grouchy de).” In DrLe Hoefer, M., ed., Nouvelle Biographie Générale depuis les temps les plus reculés jusqu'a nos jours, 46 vols. Paris: Fimin Didot Frères, 1853–1866.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. 1978. The Art of Reading. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
LaGrave, Jean-Paul de. 1994. Lettres sur la sympathie, suivies des lettres d'amour. Montreal and Paris: L'Étincelle.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Christopher. 1979. “The Nervous System and Society in the Scottish Enlightenment.” In Barnes, Barry and Shapin, Steven, eds., Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Manuel, F. E. and Manuel, F. P.. 1979. Utopian Thought in the Western World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, D. 1988. The Surprising Effects of Sympathy: Marivaux, Diderot, Rousseau and Mary Shelley. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, L. 1994. The Women Founders of the Social Sciences. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, L. 1998a. “Classical Social Theory with the Women Founders Included.” In Camic, Charles, ed., Reclaiming the Sociological Classics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McDonald, L. 1998b. Women Theorists on Society and Politics. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L.. 1976. “Introduction.” In Adam Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roussel, P. 1806. Système physique et moral de la femme, suivi d'un fragment du système physique et moral de l'homme, et d'un essai sur la sensibilité, et… d'une note sur les sympathies…, seventh edition. Paris: Caille et Ravier, 1820.Google Scholar
Skinner, Andrew S. 1995. “Adam Smith and the Role of the State: Education as a Public Service. In Copley, Stephen and Sutherland, Kathryn, eds., Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations: New Interdisciplinary Essays. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1976. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, edited by Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1860. Théorie des sentiments moraux… septisème ed. Translated by Grouchy, S., 3rd edition. Paris.Google Scholar
Staum, M. 1980. Cabanis: Enlightenment and Medical Philosophy in the French Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, W. 1922 Women of the French Revolution. New York: E.P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jane. 1999. “The Impossibility of Ethical Action: Disgrace by J.M. Coetzee (review),” South African Mail and Guardian 27 July 1999. <http://www.mg.co.za/mg/books/9907/990727-disgrace.html>>Google Scholar
Valentino, Henri. 1950. Madame de Condorcet, ses amis et ses amours. Paris: Perrin.Google Scholar