Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T07:39:35.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DOES FRIENDSHIP STEM FROM ALTRUISM? ADAM SMITH AND THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN LOVE-BASED AND INTEREST-BASED PREFERENCES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2022

Elias L. Khalil Open the ORCID record for Elias L. Khalil [Opens in a new window]
Elias L. Khalil*
Affiliation:
Elias L. Khalil: School of Economics, Administration and Public Policy, Doha Institute for Graduate Studies, Doha, Qatar, elias.lafi.khalil@gmail.com.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Friendship-and-love expresses musings about well-being—while the object of the musings, i.e., “well-being,” is the economist’s substantive satisfaction. Insofar as altruism is about well-being and not the musings, it cannot be subsumed under friendship-and-love. However, what is the basis of the difference between the economist’s substantive satisfaction and friendship-and-love? The answer can be found in Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments, chapter 2: how “mutual sympathy” differs from substantive satisfaction. Smith scholars generally miss the uniqueness of “mutual sympathy” and, indeed, fold it under Smith’s “sympathy” (and “empathy”)—with one exception. Robert Sugden highlights the uniqueness of mutual sympathy. However, he goes to the other end, that is, he folds Smith’s sympathy-and-empathy under mutual sympathy. This paper aims to avoid the folding in either direction. Indeed, it argues that each fellow-feeling deals with a question that is orthogonal to the other. Mutual sympathy originates love-based sociality (friendship-and-love), which can be juxtaposed to interest-based sociality, i.e., substantive satisfaction, such as altruism. These genera of sociality are about the nature of satisfaction or preferences, and hence in contrast to sympathy-and-empathy that are basically about judgments. As judgments, sympathy-and-empathy are ultimately about the nature of decision making, irrespective of whether the decisions concerning love-based or interest-based preferences.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , June 2023 , pp. 249 - 277
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the History of Economics Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I appreciate the comments of Robert Sugden, Jimena Hurtado (co-editor), and the editorial assistance of Lucy Mayne, Mohammad Afraz, and Maks Sipowicz. The paper greatly benefited from the detailed and generous comments of two anonymous reviewers. The usual caveat applies.

References

REFERENCES

Archer, Margaret S. 2003. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashraf, Nava, Camerer, Colin F., and Loewenstein, George. 2005. “Adam Smith, Behavioral Economist.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (3): 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacharach, Michael. 2006. Beyond Individual Choice. Edited by Gold, Natalie and Sugden, Robert. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbalet, Jack. 2007. “The Moon before the Dawn: A Seventeenth-Century Precursor of Smith’s The Theory of Moral Sentiments.” In Cockfield, G., Firth, A., and Laurent, J., eds., New Perspectives on Adam Smith’s The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 84–105.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1974. “A Theory of Social Interaction.” Journal of Political Economy 82 (6): 1063–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1978. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bernheim, R. Douglas, and Stark, Oded. 1988. “Altruism within the Family Reconsidered: Do Nice Guys Finish Last?” American Economic Review 78 (5): 1034–1045.Google Scholar
Brown, Vivienne, and Fleischacker, Samuel. 2014. The Philosophy of Adam Smith: Essays Commemorating the 250th Anniversary of The Theory of Moral Sentiments. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carrasco, María A. and Fricke, Christel. 2016. “Adam Smith’s Impartial Spectator.” Econ Journal Watch 13 (2): 249–263.Google Scholar
Cockfield, Geoff, Firth, Ann, and Laurent, John, eds. 2007. New Perspectives on Adam Smith’s The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Deshler, David. 1989. “What’s at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?” International Organization 43 (3): 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhami, Sanjit S. 2016. The Foundations of Behavioral Economic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dickey, Lawrence. 1986. “Historicizing the Adam Smith Problem: Conceptual, Historiographical, and Textual Issues.” Journal of Modern History 58 (3): 580–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, Jean-Pierre. 2004. “Intersubjectivity and Embodiment.” Journal of Bioeconomics 6: 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, Jean-Pierre. 2006. “Invidious Sympathy in The Theory of Moral Sentiments.” Adam Smith Review 2: 98–123.Google Scholar
Fricke, Christel, and Dagfinn, Føllesdal, eds. 2012. Intersubjectivity and Objectivity in Adam Smith and Edmund Husserl: A Collection of Essays. Frankfurt: Ontos-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Gilboa, Itzhak. 2012. Rational Choice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gintis, Herbert, Bowles, Samuel, Boyd, Richard, and Fehr, Ernest, eds., 2005. Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 2005. “The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (1): 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gui, Benedetto. 2000. “Beyond Transactions: On the Interpersonal Dimension of Economic Reality.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 71 (2): 139–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gui, Benedetto, and Sugden, Robert, eds. 2010. Economics and Social Interaction: Accounting for Interpersonal Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud, ed. 2006. The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, Ryan Patrick. 2009. Adam Smith and the Character of Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, Ryan Patrick. 2017. Love’s Enlightenment: Rethinking Charity in Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, Ryan Patrick. 2019. Our Great Purpose: Adam Smith on Living a Better Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. [1952] 2010. The Sensory Order: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Print.Google Scholar
Heilbroner, Robert L. 1982. “The Socialization of the Individual in Adam Smith.” History of Political Economy 14 (3): 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 1990a. “Beyond Self-Interest and Altruism: A Reconstruction of Adam Smith’s Theory of Human Conduct.” Economics and Philosophy 6 (2): 255–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 1990b. “Rationality and Social Labor in Marx.” Critical Review 4 (1–2): 239–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 1992a. “Nature and Abstract Labor in Marx.” Social Concept 6 (2): 91–117.Google Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 1992b. “Was Marx a Political Economist (or Just an Economist)? Class Power in Relation to the Entry Points of Capital.” Methodus 4 (1): 35–43.Google Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 1992c. “Marx’s Understanding of the Essence of Capitalism.” History of Economics Review 17 (1): 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 1996. “Friedrich Hayek’s Darwinian Theory of Evolution of Institutions: Two Problems.” Australian Economic Papers 35 (66): 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 1997a. “Friedrich Hayek’s Theory of Spontaneous Order: Two Problems.” Constitutional Political Economy 8: 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 1997b. “Buridan’s Ass, Uncertainty, Risk, and Self-Competition: A Theory of Entrepreneurship.” Kyklos 50 (2): 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2000a. “Beyond Natural Selection and Divine Intervention: The Lamarckian Implication of Adam Smith’s Invisible Hand.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 10: 373–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2000b. “Symbolic Products: Prestige, Pride and Identity Goods.” Theory and Decision 49: 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2001. “Adam Smith and Three Theories of Altruism.” Recherches Économiques De Louvain—Louvain Economic Review 67: 421–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2004. “What Is Altruism?” Journal of Economic Psychology 25 (1): 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2005. “An Anatomy of Authority: Adam Smith as Political Theorist.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 29: 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2009. “Self-Deceit and Self-Saving Bias: Adam Smith on ‘General Rules.’” Journal of Institutional Economics 5 (2): 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2010. “Adam Smith’s Concept of Self-Command as a Solution to Dynamic Inconsistency and the Commitment Problem.” Economic Inquiry 48 (1): 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2015a. “The Fellow-Feeling Paradox: Hume, Smith and the Moral Order.” Philosophy 90 (4): 653–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2015b. “Temptations as Impulsivity: How Far Are Regret and the Allais Paradox from Shoplifting?” Economic Modelling 51: 551–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2016. “Self-Deception as a Weightless Mask.” Facta Universitatis, Series: Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology, and History 15 (1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2017a. “Weakness of Will and Stiffness of Will: How Far Are Shirking, Slackening, Favoritism, Spoiling of Children, and Pornography from Obsessive-Compulsive Behavior?” In Altman, Morris, ed., Handbook of Behavioral Economics and Smart Decision-Making: Rational Decision-Making Within the Bounds of Reason. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 492–514.Google Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2017b. “Making Sense of Self-Deception: Distinguishing Self-Deception from Delusion, Moral Licensing, Cognitive Dissonance and Other Self-Distortions.” Philosophy 92 (4): 539–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2017c. “Socialized View of Man vs. Rational Choice Theory: What Does Smith’s Sympathy Have to Say?” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 143: 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2019a. “Wellbeing and Happiness.” Journal of Value Inquiry 53: 627–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2019b. “Is the Adulation of the Rich-and-Powerful Derived from Benevolence? Adam Smith and the Distinction Between Aspiration and Interests.” Critical Horizons: A Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory 20 (4): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2021a. “Why Is Hume Wrong in His Critique of Smith’s Sympathy—And Why Is Smith Also Wrong in his Defense?” Working paper, under review. https://www.eliaskhalil.com.Google Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2021b. “Why Is it Taboo to Monetize Some Goods? A Theory of Preferences via Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments.” Working paper, under review. https://www.eliaskhalil.com.Google Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2021c. “Adam Smith on the Cost of Love: An Anomaly for Rational Choice Theory.” Working paper, under review. https://www.eliaskhalil.com.Google Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2022. “Does Altruism Differ from Caring about the Wellbeing of Loved Ones? Distinguishing Wellbeing and Happiness.” Working paper, under review. https://www.eliaskhalil.com.Google Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. forthcoming. “Mutual Sympathy contra Peculiar Sympathy: Adam Smith’s Distinction between Fondness and Admiration.” Adam Smith Review 14: forthcoming.Google Scholar
Khalil, Elias L., and Feltovich, Nick. “Moral Licensing, Instrumental Apology and Insincerity Aversion: Taking Immanuel Kant to the Lab.” PLoS One, 13, 11, e0206878. 8 Nov. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalil, Elias L., and Marciano, Alain. 2018. “A Theory of Tasteful and Distasteful Transactions.” Kyklos 71 (1): 110–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2021a. “A Theory of Instrumental and Existential Rational Decisions: Smith, Weber, Mauss, And Tönnies After Martin Buber.” Theory and Decision 90 (1): 147–169. https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S11238-020-0772-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2021b. “Other-Regarding Preferences: The Poverty of the Self/Other Dichotomy.” Social Theory and Practice: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal of Social Philosophy 47 (2): 265–298. http://DOI/10.5840/Soctheorpract202148121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Elias L., Aimone, Jason A., Houser, Daniel, Wang, Siyu, Martinez, Deborah, and Qian, Kun. 2021. “The Aspirational Income Hypothesis: On the Limits of the Relative Income Hypothesis.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 182: 229–247. https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Jebo.2020.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, L. Lynne. 2012. “Mirror Neuron Research and Adam Smith’s Concept of Sympathy: Three Points of Correspondence.” Review of Austrian Economics 25: 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Daniel B., and Clark, Michael J.. 2011. “The Music of Social Intercourse: Synchrony in Adam Smith.” Independent Review 15 (3): 413–420.Google Scholar
Lavoie, Don, ed. 1991. Economics and Hermeneutics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Margalit, Avishai. 2004. The Ethics of Memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich. [1846] 1998. The German Ideology, Including Theses on Feuerbach. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. [1922] 1990. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre N. 2006. The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, George Herbert. 1934. Mind, Self and Society. Edited by Morris, Charles W.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Montes, Leonidas, and Schliesser, Eric, eds. 2006. New Voices on Adam Smith. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2006. The Will to Power. Translated by Anthony M. Ludovici, introduction by David Taffel. New York: Barnes & Noble Library of Essential Reading.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2001. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2015. Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Larry T., and Herman-Kinney, Nancy J., eds. 2003. Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism. New York: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Russ. 2015. How Adam Smith Can Change Your Life: An Unexpected Guide to Human Nature and Happiness. New York: Portfolio/Penguin.Google Scholar
Rowland, Robert J. Jr. 1970. “Cicero’s Necessarii.” Classical Journal 65 (5): 193–198.Google Scholar
Said, Edward W. 2000. Out of Place: A Memoir. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey. 2013. “Hume and Smith on Sympathy, Approbation, and Moral Judgment.” Social Philosophy and Policy 30 (1–2): 208–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schliesser, Eric. 2017. Adam Smith: Systematic Philosopher and Public Thinker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1977. “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 6 (4): 317–344.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. [1759] 1976. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Edited by Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Vernon L., and Wilson, Bart J.. 2014. “Fair and Impartial Spectators in Experimental Economic Behavior.” Review of Behavioral Economics 1 (1–2): 1–26. http-//Doi.Org/10.1561/105.0000000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Vernon L., and Wilson, Bart J.. 2019. Humanomics: Moral Sentiments and the Wealth of Nations for the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugden, Robert. 1989. “Spontaneous Order.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (4): 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugden, Robert. 1993. “Thinking as a Team: Toward an Explanation of Nonselfish Behavior.” Social Philosophy and Policy 10: 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugden, Robert. 2002. “Beyond Sympathy and Empathy: Adam Smith’s Concept of Fellow-Feeling.” Economics and Philosophy 18 (1): 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugden, Robert. 2003. “The Logic of Team Reasoning.” Philosophical Explorations 6 (3): 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugden, Robert. 2018. The Community of Advantage: A Behavioural Economist’s Defence of the Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titchener, Edward Bradford. 1909. Lectures on the Experimental Psychology of Thought-Processes. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tönnies, Ferdinand. [1887] 2001. Community and Civil Society. Edited by Harris, Jose, translated by Harris, Jose and Hollis, Margaret. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, David Sloan. 2015. Does Altruism Exist? Culture, Genes, and the Welfare of Others. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar