Backhaus, Juergen. “History of Economic Thought – What For? Empirical Observations From German Universities,” History of Economics Society Bulletin Vol. 8 (Winter, 1986) pp. 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumol, William J. “Review of Richard Nelson and Sidney Winter, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change,” Journal of Economic Literature Vol. 21 (06, 1983) pp. 280–81.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Richard. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, Praxis (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Blatt, John. “How Economists Misuse Mathematics,” in Alfred, Eichner ed., Why Economics is Not Yet a Science (Armonck, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, 1983) pp. 166–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blaug, Mark. The Methodology of Economics, Or How Economists Explain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Caldwell, Bruce J.Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1982).Google Scholar

Caldwell, Bruce J.. “Some Problems with Falsification in Economics,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences Vol. 14 (1984) pp. 489–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cesareno, Filippo. “On the role of the History of Economics,” History of Political Economy Vol. 15 (Spring, 1983) pp. 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clower, Robert. “Monetary History and Positive Economics” in Walker, Donald A. ed., Money and Markets. Essays by Robert W. Clower (Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Coats, A.W. “Economic Growth: The Economic and Social Historian's Dilemma,” in Harte, N.B. ed., The Study of Economic History (London: Frank Cass, 1971) pp. 331–48.Google Scholar

Coats, A.W.. “Reflections on the Role of the History of Economics in the Training of Economists,” in Studi in memorial di Federigo Melis Vol. 5 (Roma: Giannini Editore, 1978) pp. 291–305.Google Scholar

Coats, A.W.. Economists in Gevernment. An International Comparative Study (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Coats, A.W.. (ed.) Economists in International Agencies. An Exploratory Study (New York: Praeger, 1986).Google Scholar

Cole, Ken; Cameron, John; and Edwards, Chris: Why Economists Disagree: The Political Economy of Economists (London: Longmans, 1983).Google Scholar

Corry, Bernard. “Should Economists Abandon Hope?,” History of Political Economy Vol. 7 (Summer, 1975) pp. 252–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, Paul. “Post-Keynesian Economics” in Bell, Daniel and Kristol, Irving eds., The Crisis in Economic Theory (New York: Basic Books, 1981) pp. 158–64.Google Scholar

Diesing, Paul. Patterns of Discovery in the Social Sciences (Chicago: Aldine Atherton, 1971).Google Scholar

Dow, Shiela. Macroeconomic Thought: A Methodological Approach (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985).Google Scholar

Dray, William. “Narrative versus Analysis in History,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences Vol. 15 (1985) pp. 125–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elton, Geoffrey R.The Practice of History (Glasgow: Collins, Fontain, 1967).Google Scholar

Fogel, Robert William and Elton, Geoffrey R.Which Road to the Past? Two Views of History (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley. “Normal circumstances, Literal language, Direct Speech Acts, the Ordinary, the Everyday, the Obvious, What Goes Without Saying, and Other Special Cases,” in Rubinow, Paul and Sullivan, William M.Interpretative Social Science. A Reader (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979) pp. 243–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Milton. “The Economic Theorist” in Burns, Arthur F., Wesley Clair Mitchell, The Economic Scientist (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1952).Google Scholar

Goodwin, Craufurd D. “Economic Theory and Society: A Plea For Process Analysis,” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings Vol. 62 (05. 1972) pp. 409–15.Google Scholar

Gould, Stephen Jay. “Evolution and the Triumph of Homology, or Why History Matters,” American Scientist Vol. 74 (01 - 02, 1986) pp. 60–69.Google Scholar

Gnichy, Allen G.Modern Economic Thought, The American Contribution (New York: Prentice Hall, 1947).Google Scholar

Hahn, Frank A. “General Equilibrium Theory” in Bell, Daniel and Kristol, Irving, eds. The Crisis in Economic Theory (New York: Basic Books, 1981) pp. 123–38.Google Scholar

Hahn, Frank A.. “Review of Walker, Donald A., Money and Markets Essays by Robert W. Clower” in Economica N.S. Vol. 53 (08, 1986) pp. 404–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, F.A.Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, F.A.. New Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Hendry, David F. “Econometrics – Alchemy or Science?,” Economica N.S. Vol. 47 (11, 1980) pp. 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hicks, . “Some Questions of Time in Economics,” in Tang, Anthony M., Westerfield, Fred M., and Worley, James S. eds. Evolution, Welfare, and Time in Economics (Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1976) pp. 135–51.Google Scholar

Hicks, . Causality in Economics (New York: Basic Books, 1979).Google Scholar

Hollander, Samuel. “Appendix: Attack the Best Defence,” History of Political Economy Vol. 7 (Spring, 1975) pp. 115–22.Google Scholar

Hutchison, Terence W.On Revolutions and Progress in Economic Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Hutchison, Terence W.. The Politics and Philosophy of Economics: Marxists, Keynesians, and Austrians (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1981).Google Scholar

Kamarck, Andrew. Economics and the Real World (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, Abraham. The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science (San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Co., 1964).Google Scholar

Klant, J.J.The Rules of the Game. The Logical Structure of Economic Theories (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984)Google Scholar

Klein, Laurence. A Textbook of Econometrics (Evanston, Ill.: 1953).Google Scholar

Koopmans, Tjalling. “Measurement Without Theory,” Review of Economics and Statistics Vol. 29 (08, 1947) pp. 162–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962, 1970).Google Scholar

Lakatos, Imre. “History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions” in Buck, Roger C. and Cohen, Robert, P.S.A. 1970. In Memory of Rudolph Carnap. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science Vol. 8 (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1971) pp. 91–136 and 174–82.Google Scholar

Langlois, Richard N., ed. Economics as a Process. Essays in the New Institutional Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Leamer, Edward. “Let's take the ‘coin’ out of Econometrics,” American Economic Review Vol. 73 (03, 1983) pp. 31–43.Google Scholar

Leontief, Wassily. “Theoretical Assumptions and Nonobserved Facts,” American Economic Review Vol. 61 (03, 1971) pp. 1–7.Google Scholar

Marshall, Alfred. Principles of Economics 8th ed. (London: Macmillan, 1952).Google Scholar

Mayer, Thomas. “Economics as a Hard Science: Realistic Goal or Wishfil Thinking?,” Economic Inquiry Vol. 18 (04, 1980) pp. 165–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McClelland, Peter D.Causal Explanation and Model Building in Economics and the New Economic History (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Mirowski, Philip. “An Evolutionary Theory of Economics Change,” Journal of Economic Issues Vol. 17 (09, 1983) pp. 757–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mirowski, Philip. “Physics and the ‘marginalist revolution,’” Cambridge Journal of Economics Vol. 8 (1984) pp. 361–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, Mary. “Finding a Satisfactory Empirical Model,” in, The Popperian Legacy in Economics, de Marchi, Neil ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) fortcoming.Google Scholar

Morgenstern, Oskar. On the Accuracy of Economic Observations 2nd ed. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963).Google Scholar

Morishima, Michio, “The Good and Bad Uses of Mathematics,” in Wiles, Peter and Routh., Guy. ed., Economics in Disarray (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984) pp. 51–77.Google Scholar

Nelson, Richard R. and Winter, Sidney. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Nelson, Richard R. “The Tension Between Process Stories and Equilibrium Models: Analyzing the Productivity Growth Slowdown of the 1870's,” in Richard, Langlois, ed. Economics as a Process: Essays in the New Institutional Economics (Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Parker, William N.Economic History and the Modern Economist (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983).Google Scholar

Pepper, Stephen. World Hypotheses. A Study in Evidence (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1942).Google Scholar

Phelps Brown, Henry. “The Underdevelopment of Economics” Economic Journal Vol. 82 (03, 1973) pp. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porter, Dale H.The Emergence of the Past. A Theory of Historical Explanation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Prigogine, Ilya and Stengers, Isabelle. Order Out of Chaos. Man's New Dialogue With Nature (Toronto: Bantam Books, 1984).Google Scholar

Robinson, Joan. “History versus Equilibrium,” in Robinson, , Collected Economic Papers Vol. 5 (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980) pp. 48–58.Google Scholar

Rorty, Richard. The Consequences of Pragmatism. (Essays 1972–80) (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Alexander. “Can Economic Theory Explain Everything?,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences Vol. 9 (12, 1979) pp. 509–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuels, Warren. “The history of economic thought as intellectual history,” History of Political Economy Vol. 6 (Fall, 1974) pp. 305–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, Pedro. “Teaching the History of Economic Thought: Report of a Symposium at Bristol, 1973,” History of Political Economy Vol. 7 (Spring, 1975) pp. 112–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shackle, G.L.S.Decision, Order, Time in Human Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961).Google Scholar

Simon, Herbert. “The Architecture of Complexity” in Simon, , The Sciences of the Artificial (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Suts, Jan Christian. Holism and Evolution (New York: Macmillan, 1920).Google Scholar

Stigler, George J. “Economics – The Imperial Science,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics Vol. 86 (1984) pp. 301–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tarascio, Vincent J. “Intellectual History and the Social Sciences: The Problem of Methodological Pluralism,” Social Science Quarterly Vol. 56 (06, 1975) pp. 37–54.Google Scholar

Tobin, James. “Neo-classical Theory in America: J.B. Clark and Fisher,” American Economic Review Vol. 75 (12, 1975) pp. 28–38.Google Scholar

Toulmin, Stephen. Human Understanding Vol. 1 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Vining, Rutledge. “Koopmans on the Choice of Variables to be Studied and of Methods of Measurement,” Review of Economics and Statistics Vol. 31 (05, 1949) pp. 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, Donald A. ed. Money and Markets. Essays by Robert Clower. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Ward, Benjamin. What's Wrong With Economics (London: Macmillan, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ward, Benjamin. The Ideal Worlds of Economics. Liberal, Radical and Conservative World Views (New York: Basic Books, 1979).Google Scholar

White, Morton G.Social Thought in America: The Revolt Against Formalism (Boston: Beacon Press, 1957, 1966).Google Scholar

Wilber, Chrles K. and Harrison, Robet S. “The Methodological Basis of Institutional Economics: Pattern Model, Storytelling, and Holism,” Journal of Economic Issues Vol. 12 (03, 1978) pp. 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wise, Gene. American Historical Explanations (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woo, Henry. What's Wrong With Formalization in Economics? An Epistemological Critique (Newark: Victoria Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Ziman, John. Reliable Knowledge. An Exploration of the Grounds for Belief in Science. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978).Google Scholar