Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T09:21:18.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“The Labor-Less Labor Supply Model”: A Reply to David A. Spencer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Laurent Derobert
Laurent Derobert
Affiliation:
GREQAM–University of Aix-Marseille, 15-19 allée Claude Forbin, 13627 Aix-en-Provence, France.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , March 2005 , pp. 101 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Derobert, L. (2001) On the Genesis of the Canonical Labor Supply Model, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 23 (2), pp. 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derobert, L. and Thiériot, G. (2003) Lorenz Curve as an Archetype, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 10 (4), pp. 573–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. I. (1894) Pain Cost and Opportunity Cost, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 8 (2), pp. 218–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, D. A. (2003) Love's Labour's Lost? The Disutility of Work and Work Avoidance in the Economic Analysis of Labor Supply, Review ofSocial Economy, 61 (2), pp. 235–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, D. A. (2003) “The Labor-Less Labor Supply Model” in the Era Before Philip Wicksteed, Journal ofthe History of Economic Thought, 25 (4), pp. 505–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicksteed, P. H. (1910) The Common Sense ofPolitical Economy (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar