Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T14:33:50.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A NOTE INTRODUCING GAREGNANI'S PAPER

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

FABIO PETRI
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 359 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

De Vivo, Giancarlo. 1976. “Sul sistema di equilibrio economico generale di Walras.” Economia Internazionale 29 (3-4): 336–67.Google Scholar
Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter, eds. 1990. The New Palgrave: Capital Theory. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eatwell, John. 1990. “Walras's Theory of Capital.” In Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter, eds. The New Palgrave: Capital Theory. London: Macmillan, pp. 247–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garegnani, Pierangelo. 1960. Il Capitale nelle Teorie della Distribuzione. Milan: Giuffré.Google Scholar
Garegnani, Pierangelo. 1990. “Quantity of Capital.” In Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter, eds. The New Palgrave: Capital Theory. London: Macmillan, pp. 1–78.Google Scholar
Garegnani, Pierangelo. 2000. “Savings and Investment in a System of General Intertemporal Equilibrium.” In Kurz, Heinz D., ed., Critical Essays on Piero Sraffa's Legacy in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 392–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garegnani, Pierangelo. 2003. “Savings and Investment in a System of General Intertemporal Equilibrium. Appendix 2: Two notes on Hahn on ‘the neo-Ricardians’.” In Petri, Fabio and Hahn, Frank, eds., General Equilibrium: Problems and Prospects. London: Routledge, pp. 149–57, 169-70.Google Scholar
Hahn, Frank H. 1975. “Revival of Political Economy: The Wrong Issues and the Wrong Argument.” The Economic Record 51 (135): 360–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Frank H. 1982. “The neo-Ricardians.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 6 (4): 353–74.Google Scholar
Robinson, Joan. 1964. “Pre-Keynesian Theory After Keynes.” Australian Economic Papers 3: 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Joan. 1970. “Capital Theory Up To Date.” Canadian Journal of Economics 3 (May): 309–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schefold, Bertram. 2000. “Paradoxes of Capital and Counterintuitive Changes of Distribution in an Intertemporal Equilibrium Model.” In Kurz, Heinz D., ed., Critical Essays on Piero Sraffa's Legacy in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 363–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walras, Léon. 1988. Eléments d'économie politique, variorum edition, Vol. VIII of Auguste et Léon Walras, Oeuvres économiques complètes, edited by Dockès, Pierre et al. . Paris: Economica.Google Scholar