Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T10:23:08.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the coefficients in the expansion of eet and e−et

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

R. E. Beard
R. E. Beard
Affiliation:
Pearl Assurance Company, Ltd
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
Journal of the Institute of Actuaries , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , September 1950 , pp. 152 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 152 note * Epstein, L. F., J. Math. Phys. Vol. xviii pp. 153–73, 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 154 note * Epstein, L. F., J. Math. Phys. Vol. xviii, pp. 153–73, 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 155 note * Epstein, L. F., J. Math. Phys. Vol. xviii pp. 153–73, 1939 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 156 note * Formula (16) was found, in the first place, for the special function under discussion, but its elegance and the fact that it was capable of easy generalization suggested that it could not have escaped the attention of mathematicians. In fact, it was found to be a special case of a formula known as Poisson's Summation Formula. Hardy (Divergent Series, p. 330, Oxford University Press, 1949) indicates that Poisson arrived at it in his investigation of the Euler-Maclaurin formula and gives the finite form

An alternative form with various proofs and special cases together with various referencesi s given by Titchmarsh ( Introduction to Theory of Fourier Integrals, p. 60, 1937) as follows:

where

It was thought that the proof given here would be of interest to actuaries.