Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T19:51:26.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Valuation of Benefits Dependent upon Promotion to a Higher Status

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

Ernest C. Thomas
Affiliation:
Gresham Life Assurance Society

Extract

The suggestion has been made to me by Mr. George King, to write a paper upon an interesting problem which recently occupied our joint attention.

A brief statement of the case is as follows :

In a great public service there are certain well-defined ranks, the upper ones of which are exclusively recruited by promotion from the lower ones. There are limiting ages of retirement in each rank, and in the event of an officer reaching the fixed age without being promoted he is retired on a pension. The scale of pension depends mainly on length of service, varying of course with each rank, and, as the majority enter in the lowest rank between comparatively narrow limits of age, it is sufficient to deduce an average rate of pension at each age in the various ranks. The problem is to find what amount of annual contribution, uniform throughout future service, should be made in respect of each officer now in the service, of whatever age or rank, in order to provide for the ultimate charge for pensions.

In the particular case presented there were six ranks to be dealt with, and it was understood that the calculations were to be made at 3 per-cent compound interest. I trust I may be excused for this vague statement of the case, but I could hardly be more explicit without being too definite. I shall refer to these ranks throughout as first, second, third ranks, &c., where the first is understood to mean the highest.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 223 note * Throughout this paper the symbols (I) (II) placed after any function will indicate—where such distinction is necessary—to which rank the function applies.

page 231 note * From the pensioners' annuity table.

page 235 note * I should like to amplify this statement as I am afraid that in its present form it is rather open to misconception. When I wrote that 1 was thinking for the moment more particularly of the use of these tables in a valuation. For the purposes of assessing the contributions for new entrants of advanced ages I admit their complete desirability, but it is just for that purpose that the methods here described would give practically all that select tables could provide in the way of discrimination with something; additional.