Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:27:33.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The origins of the card system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 229 note * The office of Actuary to the National Debt Commissioners was held in direct succession for three generations, viz. by J. Finlaison, A. G. Finlaison and A, J. Finlaison. This once led T. B. Sprague to speak wittily of ‘the gentleman whom I may, without disrespect, call the Hereditary Government Actuary’. [Quoted from memory.]

page 229 note † It must be remembered that Finlaison's Report related entirely to the experience of friendly societies, a highly specialized branch of work, and it might well have failed to attract the attention of actuaries devoted to life assurance work. This view is confirmed by some remarks made by W. S. B. Woolhouse in 1866 (J.I.A. Vol. XIII, p. 82, f.n.), in his full and interesting, though belated, account of the construction of the Seventeen Offices' Experience. He also attributes the invention of the system to O. G. Downes, and makes no reference to Finlaison. After some cautions he speaks of ‘the manifold advantages of the system’. These advantages will be better appreciated by modern actuaries who have been brought up on the Card System if they will turn to and consider Woolhouse's examples of the schedules which were used under the old system (loc. cit. pp. 78–80).