Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T23:34:32.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Principles to be observed in Life Office Valuations made with a view to Distribution of Profits: being a paper read to the Actuarial Society of Edinburgh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

Extract

Some apology is needed, perhaps, for proposing to rediscuss a subject which has been handled so often, and by so many distinguished actuaries. But I am probably addressing gentlemen who have not had occasion to become familiar with all that has been written or said on the subject, and others to whom it may usefully be presented from a fresh point of view; and there are some important practical questions too on which the profession seem scarcely yet agreed, which will admit of further consideration. I shall not attempt to notice the various papers which from time to time have been contributed by actuaries towards the solution of the questions I am to consider. For many of the views I am to express I am necessarily indebted to those who have preceded me; and the aim of this paper is less to introduce what is new, than to enforce, and illustrate if possible, sound and correct opinions. I am anxious to set the subject in a light which will make it intelligible to others than actuaries, and to discuss principles rather than formulas.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1878

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 26 note * This plan might be carried the length of dividing the transaction into a term assurance for t years and a whole life assurance deferred for t years. The limit of t would be found in this, that the premium calculated for age x + t, with the loading required for expenses and contingencies still future, would require to be not greater than the public would pay at age x.