Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:04:05.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Primary progressive aphasia: Diagnosis, varieties, evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2003

ANDREW KERTESZ
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, St. Joseph's Health Care London, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
WILDA DAVIDSON
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, St. Joseph's Health Care London, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
PATRICIA MCCABE
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, St. Joseph's Health Care London, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
KENJI TAKAGI
Affiliation:
Kashima Rosai Hospital, 1-9108-2 Doai-honchou Hasaki-chou, Kashima-gun, Ibaragi, 314-0343 Japan
DAVID MUNOZ
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology and Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada and Banco de Tejidos para Investigacion Neurológica Universidad Autonoma, Madrid, Spain

Abstract

A referred cohort of 67 clinically defined PPA patients were compared to 99 AD patients with formal language and nonverbal cognitive tests in a case control design. Language fluency was determined at the first and last follow up visits. Quantitation of sulcal and ventricular atrophy on MRI was carried out in 46 PPA and 53 AD patients. Most PPA patients (57%) are relatively fluent when first examined. Visuospatial and memory functions are initially preserved. Aphemic, stuttering, “pure motor” presentation, or agrammatic aphasia are seen less frequently. Later most PPAs become logopenic and nonfluent, even those with semantic aphasia (dementia). In contrast, AD patients were more fluent and had relatively lower comprehension, but better overall language performance. MRI showed significant left sided atrophy in most PPA patients. Subsequent to PPA, 25 patients developed behavioral manifestations of frontotemporal dementia and 15 the corticobasal degeneration syndrome, indicating the substantial clinical overlap of these conditions. Language testing, particularly fluency scores supported by neuroimaging are helpful differentiating PPA from AD. The fluent–nonfluent dichotomy in PPA is mostly stage related. The aphemic-logopenic-agrammatic and semantic distinction is useful, but the outcomes converge. (JINS, 2003, 9, 710–719.)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)