Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T05:39:07.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The articulation of Malayalam coronal stops and nasals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Sarah N. Dart
Affiliation:
Macalester College, St. Paul, MN, USAdart@macalester.edu
Paroo Nihalani
Affiliation:
Oita National University, Japan e-mail:nihalani@hotmail.com

Extract

The Dravidian language Malayalam has stops and nasals in seven places of articulation, but what is meant by a ‘place of articulation’ is not clear. Palatograms and linguograms, with simultaneous audio recordings, were taken of nine speakers and eight test words illustrating the four coronal stops and nasals in word-medial position. Results show that reference must be made to both the upper and lower articulators in describing the articulation of these consonants. Some of the contrasts are made solely on the basis of place of articulation on the upper articulator (e.g. dental vs. alveolar for some speakers) and others only on the basis of apicality (e.g. alveolar vs. palatoalveolar, both of which are articulated on the alveolar ridge for most speakers, but differ in the tongue contact). Other articulations (such as retroflex) remain maximally distinct by utilizing both parameters. Acoustic results give further evidence of overall tongue shape differences between these four segments.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dart, S.N. (1991). Articulatory and acoustic properties of apical and laminal articulations UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 79.Google Scholar
Dart, S.N. (1993). Phonetic properties of O'odham stop and fricative contrasts. International Journal of American Linguistics 59, 1637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, P.A. (1996). The Phonology-Phonetics Interface. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 92, 4560.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1997). Linguistic phonetic descriptions. In Hardcastle, W. J. and Laver, J. (editors), The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 589618. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. and Maddeson, I. (1996). The Sounds of the World's Languages, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lahiri, A. and Blumstein, S.E. (1984). A re-evaluation of the feature coronal. Journal of Phonetics 12, 133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanan, K.P. and Mohanan, T. (1984). Lexical phonology of the consonant system in Malayalam. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 4:575602.Google Scholar
Recasens, D. (1983). Place cues for nasal consonants with special reference to Catalan. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73, 4:13461353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scatton, E. (1984). A Reference Grammar of Bulgarian. Cambridge, MA: Slavica.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. (1997). Articulatory-acoustic-auditory relationships. In Hardcastle, W. J. and Laver, J. (editors), The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 462506. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar