Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T16:08:36.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The IPA consonant chart: Mugwumps, holes and therapeutic suggestions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Caroline G. Henton
Caroline G. Henton
Affiliation:
Linguistics Program, University of California. Davis, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For some time now it has been clear that the International Phonetic Alphabet consonant chart needs to be carefully re-examined, with a view to its intended provision and possible revision. This article appears as part of the current drive (see also Ladefoged (1987a)) to solicit suggestions for the improvement or revision of the chart, from all the manifold users of the IPA alphabet. The focus here is on the consonant chart, for while the representation of vowels has always been more problematic, the theoretical issues are of a different order and should be discussed separately.

Type
Revision of the IPA
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , July 1987 , pp. 15 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, C-J. N. (1976). Some additions to the phonetic alphabet. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 6, 32–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, A. (1974). The IPA Alphabet: remarks on some proposals for reform. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 4, 76–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimson, A. C. (1973). The Association's Alphabet. Journal of International Phonetic Association 3 2–3; 60–61.Google Scholar
International Phonetic Association. (1949). The Principles of the International Phonetic Association. London: International Phonetic Association.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1987a). Updating the theory. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 17:1, 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1987b). Revising the International Phonetic Alphabet. To appear in Proceedings of the Eleventh International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Tallinn).Google Scholar
Lennig, M. and Brassard, J. P. (1984). Machine-readable phonetic alphabet for English and French. Speech Communication 3, 165–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, I. (1987). Revision of the IPA: linguo-labials as a test case. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 17:1, 26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, J. D. (1975). The IPA alphabet: a case for reform. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 5, 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J. A. H., Bradley, H., Craigie, W. A. and Onions, C. T. (1933). The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. K. and Ladusaw, W. A. (1986). Phonetic Symbol Guide. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1975). The Association's Alphabet. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 5, 52–58.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1976). The Association's Alphabet. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 6, 2–3.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1986). A standardized machine-readable phonetic notation. In Conference Publication No. 258. International Conference on Speech Input/Output; Techniques and Applications, 24–26 March 1986. London: Institution of Electrical Engineers, 134–137.Google Scholar