Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T22:46:21.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two types of voiceless nasals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

P. Bhaskararao
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Deccan College. Pune 411006, India
Peter Ladefoged
Affiliation:
Phonetics Laboratory, Linguistics Department, UCLA, Los Angeles CA 90024–1543

Extract

Many languages in South East Asia have voiceless nasal consonants that contrast with their voiced counterparts. What has not been reported previously is that there are two distinct types of voiceless nasals. We will begin by considering the more well-known type, found in languages such as Burmese. These voiceless nasals are usually said to have an open glottis for most of the articulation, but some voicing for the period just before the stricture is broken (Ladefoged 1971: 11). In this view they have two parts. The first is necessary to distinguish them from their voiced counterparts. The second distinguishes one voiceless nasal from another, by making the place of articulation more apparent; the voiced offglide from the nasal into the vowel has formant transitions that are characteristic of each place of articulation. Dantsuji has shown that, in addition, the voiced portion of the voiceless nasals in Burmese “includes significant cues which can distinguish points of articulation” (Dantsuji 1986: 10). Despite the small voiced portion, in most phonological treatments of these sounds, a voiceless nasal consonant is considered not as a sequence of two items, a voiceless segment followed by a voiced segment, but as a single voiceless unit with a low level phonetic rule inserting the voicing towards the end. Burmese is a textbook example, with forms as shown in Table 1 (from Maddieson 1984; also in Ladefoged 1993: 282).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bright, W. (1957). Alternations in Lushai. Indian Linguistics, 18, 101110.Google Scholar
Burling, R. (1957). Lushai Phonemics. Indian Linguistics, 17, 148175.Google Scholar
Chase, N. (forthcoming). A descriptive analysis of the Khwünomia dialect of Angami. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Poona.Google Scholar
Dantsuji, M. (1984). A study on voiceless nasals in Burmese. Studia Phonologica, 18, 114.Google Scholar
Dantsuji, M. (1986). Some acoustic observations on the distinction of place of articulation for voiceless nasals in Burmese. Studia Phonologica, 20, 111.Google Scholar
Henderson, E. (1948). Notes on the syllable structure of Lushai. Bulletin of the School of Oriential and African Studies, 12, 713725.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1971). Preliminaries to Linguistic Phonetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1993). A Course in Phonetics Third edition. Fort Worth: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1991). Instrumental phonetic fieldwork: techniques and results. In Actes du XIIème Congrès International des Sciences Phonétiques, Volume 4: 126129. Aixen-Provence: Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Maddieson, I. (1984). The effects on FO of a voicing distinction in sonorants and their implications for a theory of tonogenesis. Journal of Phonetics, 12, 915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, I. (1991). Articulatory phonology and Sukuma “aspirated nasals”. Paper presented at the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Special African Session. To appear in Proceedings.Google Scholar
Ravindran, N. (1974). Angami phonetic reader. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Weidert, A. (1975). Componential analysis of Lushai phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar