Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T10:14:41.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comment by the Editor on Maddieson and on Kelly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Extract

It may be useful to separate out the issue of a choice of symbol from the issue of its status (official approval or individual usage). On the choice of symbol, if we endorse the apparent bias towards articulation as a defining criterion in the IPA then criteria like diachrony, perceptual similarity and even phonology are secondary at best. (Note that in making this inference from current practice, I do not wish to pre-empt any debate about whether the articulatory bias is valid!)

Type
Revision of the IPA: Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)