Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T13:22:48.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some proposals concerning glottal consonants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Peter Ladefoged
Peter Ladefoged
Affiliation:
Phonetics Laboratory, UCLA, Los Angeles CA 90024-1543, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A topic that was not discussed at the 1989 Kiel convention was the phonetic specification of [h]. Judging by its current place on the chart it appears to be a voiceless glottal fricative. But this is a misnomer, in that most forms of [h] have very little friction at the glottis. The vocal cords are apart and any turbulent airflow that there might be is due to what Pike (1943) calls “cavity friction” rather than local friction at a particular point, [h] has no more friction at the glottis than [f] or any other voiceless sound with a comparable airflow.

Type
Phonetic Representation a) Revision of the IPA
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , December 1990 , pp. 24 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Keating, P. (1988). Underspecification in phonetics. Phonology 5 (2): 275–292.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1982). A Course in Phonetics. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Pike, K. (1943). Phonetics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar