Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T08:15:18.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adaptations of two Intertidal Isopods II. Comparison between Campecopea Hirsuta and NAESA BIDENTATA (Sphaeromatidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Wolfgang Wieser
Wolfgang Wieser
Affiliation:
Zoologisches Institut der Universität, Vienna, Austria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the investigation described in this paper, respiration, resistance to desiccation and feeding behaviour of .the mid- to upper-tidal isopod Campecopea hirsuta was studied and compared with the analogous parameters of behaviour in the lower intertidal species Naesa bidentata

C. hirsuta occurs in the middle part of the shore where it can be found within empty shells of Chthamalus. Its preferred habitat, however, is the lichen Lichina pygmaea the vertical distribution of which extends from OD to MHWS.

Campecopea hirsuta feeds on the blue-green algae that make up the outer layer of the lichen L. pygmaea. When continuously submerged the isopod feeds in bursts, the timing of which is different in different specimens. This mode of feeding under experimental conditions is taken as reflecting the rhythmic way of life of this species in its natural environment but it seems to be controlled by endogenous factors. Naesa bidentata, on the other hand, does not display such endogenous rhythms in its feeding behaviour.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , February 1963 , pp. 97 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, H. & Barnes, M.,1959. Studies on the metabolism of cirripedes. The relation between body weight, oxygen uptake and species habitat. Verdff. Inst. Meeresforsch, Bremerhaven, Bd. 6, pp. 515–23.Google Scholar
Bursell, E., 1955. The transpiration of terrestrial isopods. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 32, pp. 238–55.Google Scholar
Colman, J., 1933. The nature of the intertidal zonation of plants and animals. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 18, pp. 721–60.Google Scholar
Colman, J.,1940. On the faunas inhabiting intertidal seaweeds. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 24, pp. 129–83.Google Scholar
Gray, I. E., 1957.A comparative study of the gill area of crabs. Biol. Bull., Woods, Hole, Vol. 112, pp. 34–42.Google Scholar
Hansen, H. J., 1906. On the propagation, structure, and classification of the family Sphaeromidae. Quart. J. micr. Sci., N.S., Vol. 49, pp. 69–135.Google Scholar
Monterosso, B., 1928. Studii cirripedologici. III. Boll. Sor. ital. Biol. sper., Vol. 3, pp. 1067–70.Google Scholar
Morton, J. E., Boney, A. D. & Corner, E. D. S., 1957. The adaptations of Lasaea rubra (Montagu), a small intertidal lamellibranch. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 36, pp. 383–405.Google Scholar
Pearse, A. S., 1929. Observations on certain littoral and terrestrial animals at Tortugas, Florida. Publ. Carneg. Instn, No. 391, pp. 205–23.Google Scholar
Vernberg, F. J., 1956. Study of the oxygen consumption of excised tissues of certain marine decapod Crustacea in relation to habitat. Physiol. Z00L, Vol. 29, pp. 227–34.Google Scholar
Wieser, W., 1962a. Adaptations of two intertidal isopods. I. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 42, pp. 665–682.Google Scholar
Wieser, W., 1962b. Parameter des Sauerstoffverbrauches. I. Z. vergl. Physiol., Bd. 45, pp. 247–71.Google Scholar
Wolvekamp, H. P. & Waterman, T. H., 1960. Respiration. In T. H. Waterman (Ed.): The Physiology of Crustacea, Vol. 1, pp. 35–100.Google Scholar