Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T07:22:23.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aggregation behaviour of the brittle-star Ophiothrix fragilis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

D. M. Broom
D. M. Broom
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Dense aggregations of echinoderms on the sea bed have been described from various parts of the world. Reese (1966) considered that such an aggregation ‘is a response to one or more essential environmental factors such as food or substratum, and does not reflect social behaviour per se’ Observations by Warner (1969, 1971) and by Brun (1969) suggested that, in aggregations of the brittle-star Ophiothrix fragilis, individuals may respond to conspecifics rather than solely to food or the substratum. On an apparently uniform substratum, some areas are covered with a dense bed of brittle-stars while other adjacent areas are devoid of brittle-stars. Warner (1971) pointed out that the aggregations are advantageous to the species so it seems possible that the animals might aggregate actively rather than coming to a suitable feeding area by chance. The aims in this study were to investigate the responses shown by Ophiothrix fragilis to its physical surroundings, to some of the other organisms living near it and, especially, to conspecifics. The animals studied are in dense aggregations off Berry Head in Southern England and all observations were made underwater in the natural habitat.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , March 1975 , pp. 191 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Binyon, J., 1972. Physiology of Echinoderms. x, 264 pp. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Brun, E., 1969. Aggregation of Ophiothrix fragilis (Abildgaard) (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). Nytt Magasin for Zoologie, 17, 153–60.Google Scholar
Castilla, J. C., 1971. Responses to light of Asterias rubens L. In: Fourth European Marine Biology Symposium, ed. Crisp, D. J., pp. 495–511. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Castilla, J. C., 1972. Responses of Asterias rubens to bivalve prey in a Y-maze. Marine Biology, 12, 222–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reese, E., 1966. The complex behaviour of echinoderms. In: Physiology of Echinodermata, ed. Boolootian, R. A., 157–218. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Romanes, G. J. & Ewart, J. C., 1881. Observations on the locomotor system of Echinodermata. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 172, 829–85.Google Scholar
Warner, G. F., 1969. Brittle-star beds in Torbay, Devon. Underwater Association Report, pp. 81–5.Google Scholar
Warner, G. F., 1971. On the ecology of a dense bed of the brittle-star Ophiothrix fragilis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of The United Kingdom, 51, 267–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, G. F. & Woodley, J. D., 1975. Suspension feeding in the brittle-star Ophiothrix fragilis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55, 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar