Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T05:08:30.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of wave exposure on the abundance and composition of amphipod and tanaidacean assemblages inhabiting intertidal coralline algae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2015

M. Bueno*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Programa de Pós Graduação em Ecologia, Instituto de Biologia CP 6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas – UNICAMP, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil Universidade de São Paulo, Centro de Biologia Marinha, Rodovia Manoel Hipólito do Rego, Km 131,5, 11600-000, São Sebastião, SP, Brazil
S.A. Dena-Silva
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Programa de Pós Graduação em Ecologia, Instituto de Biologia CP 6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas – UNICAMP, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil
A.A.V. Flores
Affiliation:
Universidade de São Paulo, Centro de Biologia Marinha, Rodovia Manoel Hipólito do Rego, Km 131,5, 11600-000, São Sebastião, SP, Brazil
F.P.P. Leite
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Programa de Pós Graduação em Ecologia, Instituto de Biologia CP 6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas – UNICAMP, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to:M. Bueno, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Programa de Pós Graduação em Ecologia, Instituto de Biologia CP 6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas – UNICAMP, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil email: mariliabueno@live.com

Abstract

Peracarid crustaceans are an important component of the vagile fauna associated with coralline algal beds, which often characterize the infralittoral fringe of tropical rocky shores. Among other variables affecting faunal assemblages, sedimentation, food supply and oxygen concentration within mats or turfs of coralline algae may greatly depend on the exposure to waves. In this study, peracarid assemblages were compared at replicated rocky shores within different levels of wave exposure, along a coastline in south-eastern Brazil. Overall amphipod diversity (11 species) was much higher than tanaidacean diversity (two species). Correlation analyses did not support any biological interactions between amphipods and tanaidaceans. Habitat complexity, while apparently limiting amphipod populations, did not affect tanaidaceans at a local scale. Amphipod abundance, not assemblage structure, was positively affected by wave exposure, probably improving oxygen concentration levels and renewal of food resources. Rather than abundance, which remains fairly stable, exposure to waves determined species identity in tanaidaceans, with Zeuxo coralensis found at exposed shores and Leptochelia aff. dubia found at sheltered shores, except for two L. aff. dubia individuals found at one of the exposed sites. Differences in the supply of sediment and the ability of these species in manipulating grains for tube building may explain such a striking pattern.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Appadoo, C. and Myers, A.A. (2003) Observations on the tube-building behaviour of the marine amphipod Cymadusa filosa Savigny (Crustacea: Ampithoidae). Journal of Natural History 37, 21512164.Google Scholar
Bamber, R. (2010) In the footsteps of Henrik Nikolaj Krøyer: the rediscovery and redescription of Leptochelia savignyi (Krøyer, 1842) sensu stricto (Crustacea Tanaidacea Leptocheliidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 123, 289311.Google Scholar
Blamey, L.K. and Branch, G.M. (2009) Habitat diversity relative to wave action on rocky shores: implications for the selection of marine protected areas. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19, 645657.Google Scholar
Blockley, D.J. and Chapman, M.G. (2008) Exposure of seawalls to waves within an urban estuary: effects on intertidal assemblages. Austral Ecology 33, 168183.Google Scholar
Boström, C. and Bonsdorff, E. (2000) Zoobenthic community establishment and habitat complexity – the importance of seagrass shoot-density, morphology and physical disturbance for faunal recruitment. Marine Ecology Progress Series 205, 123138.Google Scholar
Bueno, M. and Flores, A.A.V. (2010) Tidal-amplitude rhythms of larval release: variable departure from presumed optimal timing among populations of the mottled shore crab. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 90, 859865.Google Scholar
Burrows, M.T., Harvey, R. and Robb, L. (2008) Wave exposure indices from digital coastlines and the prediction of rocky shore community structure. Marine Ecology Progress Series 353, 112.Google Scholar
Bussell, J.A., Lucas, I.A.N. and Seed, R. (2007) Patterns in the invertebrate assemblage associated with Corallina officinalis in tide pools. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87, 383388.Google Scholar
Chavanich, S. and Wilson, K.A. (2000) Rocky intertidal zonation of gammaridean amphipods in Long Island Sound, Connecticut. Crustaceana 73, 835846.Google Scholar
Christofoletti, R.A., Takahashi, C.K., Oliveira, D.N. and Flores, A.A.V. (2011) Abundance of sedentary consumers and sessile organisms along the wave exposure gradient of subtropical rocky shores of the south-west Atlantic. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 91, 961967.Google Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Gorley, R.N. (2006) PRIMER v6: User Manual/Tutorial. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
Dayton, P.K. (1971) Competition, disturbance, and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecological Monographs 41, 351389.Google Scholar
Denny, M.W. (2006) Ocean waves, nearshore ecology, and natural selection. Aquatic Ecology 40, 439461.Google Scholar
Dommasnes, A. (1968) Variations in the meiofauna of Corallina officinalis L. with wave exposure. Sarsia 34, 117124.Google Scholar
Fenwick, G.D. (1976) The effect of wave exposure on the amphipod fauna of the alga Caulerpa brownii. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 25, 118.Google Scholar
Guerra-García, J.M., Tierno de Figueroa, J.M., Navarro-Barranco, C., Ros, M., Sánchez-Moyano, J.E. and Moreira, J. (2014) Dietary analysis of the marine Amphipoda (Crustacea: Peracarida) from the Iberian Peninsula. Journal of Sea Research 85, 508517.Google Scholar
Hicks, G.R.F. (1977) Species associations and seasonal population densities of marine phytal harpacticoid copepods from Cook Strait. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 11, 621643.Google Scholar
Hunt, H.L. and Scheibling, R.E. (1996) Physical and biological factors influencing mussel (Mytilus trossulus, M. edulis) settlement on a wave-exposed rocky shore. Marine Ecology Progress Series 142, 135145.Google Scholar
Izquierdo, D. and Guerra-García, J.M. (2011) Distribution patterns of the peracarid crustaceans associated with the alga Corallina elongata along the intertidal rocky shores of the Iberian Peninsula. Helgoland Marine Research 65, 233243.Google Scholar
Jacobucci, G.B. and Leite, F.P.P. (2014) The role of epiphytic algae and different species of Sargassum in the distribution and feeding of herbivorous amphipods. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research 42, 353363.Google Scholar
Johansen, H.W. (1974) Articulated coralline algae. Oceanography and Marine Biology – An Annual Review 12, 77127.Google Scholar
Joly, A.B. (1967) Gêneros de Algas Marinhas da Costa Atlântica Latino-Americana. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Kennelly, S.J. (1989) Effects of kelp canopies on understorey species due to shade and scour. Marine Ecology Progress Series 50, 215224.Google Scholar
Kitsos, M.-S. and Koukouras, A. (2003) Effects of a tidal current of graded intensity on the midlittoral hard substratum peracaridan fauna in the Aegean Sea. Crustaceana 76, 295306.Google Scholar
Krasnow, L.D. and Taghon, G.L. (1997) Rate of tube building and sediment particle size selection during tube construction by the tanaid crustacean, Leptochelia dubia. Estuaries 20, 534546.Google Scholar
Lancellotti, D.A. and Trucco, R.G. (1993) Distribution patterns and coexistence of 6 species of the amphipod genus Hyale. Marine Ecology Progress Series 93, 131141.Google Scholar
Leite, F.P.P., Güth, A.Z. and Jacobucci, G.B. (2000) Temporal comparison of gammaridean amphipods of Sargassum cymosum on two rocky shores in southeastern Brazil. Nauplius 8, 227236.Google Scholar
Littler, M.M. and Littler, D.S. (1980) The evolution of thallus form and survival strategies in benthic marine macroalgae: field and laboratory tests of a functional form model. American Naturalist 116, 2544.Google Scholar
Madsen, J.D., Chambers, P.A., James, W.F., Koch, E.W. and Westlake, D.F. (2001) The interaction between water movement, sediment dynamics and submersed macrophytes. Hydrobiologia 444, 7184.Google Scholar
Masunari, S. (1982) Organismos do fital Amphiroa beauvoisii Lamouroux, 1816 (Rhodophyta: Corallinaceae). Autoecologia. Boletim de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo 7, 57148.Google Scholar
McQuaid, C.D. and Branch, G.M. (1984) Influence of sea temperature, substratum and wave exposure on rocky intertidal communities – an analysis of faunal and floral biomass. Marine Ecology Progress Series 19, 145151.Google Scholar
Nelson, W.G. (1979) Experimental studies of selective predation on amphipods: consequences for amphipod distribution and abundance. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 38, 225245.Google Scholar
Norderhaug, K.M., Christie, H., Andersen, G.S. and Bekkby, T. (2012) Does the diversity of kelp forest macrofauna increase with wave exposure? Journal of Sea Research 69, 3642.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, M.J. (2008) Reduction of wave forces within bare patches in mussel beds. Marine Ecology Progress Series 362, 157167.Google Scholar
Paine, R.T. and Levin, S.A. (1981) Intertidal landscapes: disturbance and the dynamics of pattern. Ecological Monographs 51, 145178.Google Scholar
Palumbi, S.R. (1984) Measuring intertidal wave force. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 81, 171179.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A.L. and Scheibling, R.E. (2006) A comparison of epifauna and epiphytes on native kelps (Laminaria species) and an invasive alga (Codium fragile ssp. tormentosoides) in Nova Scotia, Canada. Botanica Marina 49, 315330.Google Scholar
StatSoft, Inc. (2005) STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7.1. www.statsoft.com.Google Scholar
Stephenson, T.A. and Stephenson, A. (1972) Life between tidemarks on rocky shores, 1st edn. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman & Company.Google Scholar
Tanaka, M.O. and Leite, F.P.P. (2003) Spatial scaling in the distribution of macrofauna associated with Sargassum stenophyllum (Mertens) Martius: analyses of faunal groups, gammarid life habits, and assemblage structure. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 293, 122.Google Scholar
Tararam, A.S., Wakabara, Y. and Leite, F.P.P. (1986) Vertical distribution of amphipods living on algae of a Brazilian intertidal rocky shore. Crustaceana 51, 183187.Google Scholar
Thiel, M. (2000) Population and reproductive biology of two sibling amphipod species from ascidians and sponges. Marine Biology 137, 661674.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. and Chapman, M.G. (2002) GMAV-5 for Windows. An analysis of variance program. Sydney: The University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Whorff, J.S., Whorff, L.L. and Sweet, M.H. (1995) Spatial variation in an algal turf community with respect to substratum slope and wave height. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 75, 429444.Google Scholar
Wieser, W. (1952) Investigations on the microfauna inhabiting seaweeds on rocky coasts. IV. Studies on the vertical distribution of the fauna inhabiting seaweeds below the Plymouth Laboratory. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 31, 145174.Google Scholar