Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T19:02:12.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further observations on a population of dog-whelks, Nucella lapillus (Gastropoda) recolonizing a site following amelioration of tributyltin (TBT) pollution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2003

J.H. Crothers
J.H. Crothers*
Affiliation:
Egypt Cottage, Fair Cross, Washford, Watchet, Somerset, TA23 0LY, UK, E-mail: Crothers@nettlecombe.demon.co.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tributyltin (TBT) leaching from the antifouling paint on hulls of pleasure craft eliminated a population of dog-whelks Nucella lapillus from Watermouth Cove in the Bristol Channel but outside the Cove the number of snails was apparently unaffected. Following the ban on TBT in antifouling paints, the species has recovered most of its former range in the Cove. It is postulated that the recolonization was from a subtidal population of unusually large and elongated individuals. It was observed that it had taken some 13 years to recolonize a distance of 30 metres.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 83 , Issue 5 , October 2003 , pp. 1023 - 1027
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ballantine, W.J., 1961. A biologically-defined exposure scale for the comparative description of rocky shores. Field Studies, 1 (3), 1–19.Google Scholar
Bryan, G.W., Gibbs, P.E., Hummerstone, L.G. & Burt, G.R., 1986. The decline of the gastropod Nucella lapillus around south-west England: evidence for the effect of tributyltin from antifouling paints. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 66, 525–544.Google Scholar
Chalmers, N. & Parker, P., 1989. The OUproject guide; fieldwork and statistics for ecological projects. Shrewsbury: Field Studies Council.Google Scholar
Crothers, J.H., 1973. On variation in Nucella lapillus (L.): shell shape in populations from Pembrokeshire, South Wales. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 40, 319–327.Google Scholar
Crothers, J.H., 1974. On variation in Nucella lapillus (L.): shell shape in populations from the Bristol Channel. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 41, 157–170.Google Scholar
Crothers, J.H., 1985. Dog-whelks: an introduction to the biology of Nucella lapillus (L.) Field Studies, 6, 291–360.Google Scholar
Crothers, J.H., 1989. Has the population decline due to TBT pollution affected shell-shape variation in the dog-whelk, Nucella lapillus (L.), Journal of Molluscan Studies, 55, 461–467.Google Scholar
Crothers, J.H., 1998. The size and shape of dog-whelks, Nucella lapillus, recolonising a site formerly polluted by tributyltin (TBT) in anti-fouling paint. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 64, 127–129.Google Scholar
Gibbs, P.E., 1993. Phenotypic changes in the progeny of Nucella lapillus (Gastropoda) transplanted from an exposed shore to sheltered inlets. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 59, 187–194.Google Scholar
Waite, M.E., Waldock, M.J., Thain, J.E., Smith, D.J. & Milton, S.M., 1991. Reductions inTBTconcentrations in UK estuaries following legislation in 1986 and 1987. Marine Environmental Research, 32, 89–111.Google Scholar