Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:38:17.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hatching in Calanus finmarchicus and some other copepods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

S. M. Marshall
Affiliation:
The Marine Station, Millport
A. P. Orr
Affiliation:
The Marine Station, Millport

Extract

During observations on the development of the eggs of Calanus finmarchicus the process of hatching was watched on many occasions. Since it differs from that described by Ziegelmayer (1926) for cyclopids it seemed worth while examining the process in other groups of copepods as well.

Hatching can be followed very easily in Calanus (Pl. I). For some time before, the form of the nauplius can be clearly seen with its limbs folded close to the body (A); in many a red pigment spot develops at this time in the otherwise transparent egg. Shortly before hatching the limbs begin to twitch occasionally and a space is just visible round the body of the nauplius. At this stage the inner and the outer egg membranes cannot be distinguished, but when hatching begins, the outer membrane must crack for the delicate inner membrane bulges out (B). The bulge enlarges rapidly (c), and the nauplius extends into the bulge, sometimes leaving a clear space between itself and the membranes (D). Usually it is either the head or the tail end which pushes into the bulge, but occasionally it is a limb. Probably it is abnormal for a limb to extrude first since such eggs do not always hatch successfully. As the inner membrane expands, the outer slips back and the inner, enclosing the nauplius, pops out (E). This emergence often occurs suddenly, but sometimes it is gradual (as in E), when the outer membrane crumples up on the inner, regaining its original shape only when the inner has slipped out and the tension is released (F).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Herrick, F. H., 1895. The American lobster; a study of its habits and development. Bull. U.S. Fish. Comm., Vol. 15, 252 pp.Google Scholar
Manton, S. M., 1928. On the embryology of a mysid crustacean, Hemimysis lamornae. Phil. Trans. B, Vol. 216, pp. 363463.Google Scholar
Marshall, S. M., 1949. On the biology of the small copepods in Loch Striven. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 28, pp. 45122.Google Scholar
Marshall, S. M., Orr, A. P. & Rees, C. B., 1953. Calanus finmarchicus and related forms. Nature, Lond., Vol. 171, p. 163.Google ScholarPubMed
Needham, J., 1931. Chemical Embryology. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nicholls, A. G., 1934. The developmental stages of Euchaeta norvegica, Boeck. Proc. roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 54, pp. 3150.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. B., 1905. North American parasitic copepods, belonging to the family Caligidae. Part I. The Caliginae. Proc. U.S. nat. Mus., Vol. 28, pp. 479672.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1937. The nature and significance of the membranes surrounding the developing eggs of Homarus vulgaris and other Decapoda. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. A, Vol. 107, pp. 499517Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1946. Permeability and properties of the membranes surrounding the developing egg of Homarus vulgaris. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 26, pp. 432–8.Google Scholar
Ziegelmayer, W., 1926. Untersuchungen zum Quellungsmechanismus von Eizellen. Z. Zellforsch., Bd. 4, pp. 73122.Google Scholar